Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 90

Thread: Autococker Curious (Caution: Long-winded OP)

  1. #1

    Autococker Curious (Caution: Long-winded OP)

    I recently started thinking about getting my first Autococker after all these years. I know next to nothing about them. I love mech guns though and have faithfully shot mags from the very beginning. When I bought my first mag in 1995, I very nearly got an Autococker instead - that beefy shroud with the ribs going over the barrel looked so cool - but the .68 Automag ultimately won out simply because my local paintball store had that one in stock at the time. I've been an Automag guy ever since and haven't looked back. Until now. I've heard about the special character that only cockers have and how fun they are to shoot - all those sounds and moving parts make them gleefully over-complicated like a Rube Goldberg machine. I'm intrigued and I think I'm ready to make the leap.

    There's lots of different cockers out there to choose from it seems. It's a little daunting. I do know that, above all, I want a "fun gun" - something to putt around with in recball games. As such, it doesn't need to be high performance but it's got to be non-problematic. The 4 key aspects I require are good reliability, ease of maintenance/disassembly, a fluid single-finger trigger pull, and reasonably balanced ergonomics. Not so important qualities include rate of fire, overall weight, air efficiency/consistency, upgradability, and cost (to an extent). As far as marker appearance, I generally find pimped out, chrome glistening, brightly anodized, rediculously milled, aftermarket-upgraded guns to be a bit of a turn off. Just not my style. You lose a little history with customization, especially when it's altered to someone else's liking. For me, the more OEM the gun is, the better.

    One of my first choices is a late 90s WGP specimen that is bone stock. I think the '98s in particular look great and they positively reek of paintball history. I'm a little concerned about their overall practicality, though. I hear that ball rollout, short stroking, and centerfeed necks are issues. I'm also concerned that numerous upgrades might be a necessity for the gun to function well (i.e. deal breaker, I don't want a project build). School me if my apprehensions here are unwarranted.

    The other option I'm seriously considering is an Empire Resurrection. On the downside, it's missing that classic back-block as well as the pneumatics-shroud, and I don't care for the big "Empire" logo that's billboarded onto the side of the body, either. Nevertheless, they still look quite good. And apparently they function really well, too...though short stroking is still a thing. It has a clamping vertical feedneck, a purging ASA, and a matching barrel kit...all stock. Oh, and gone is the dreaded valve tool. Just not sure whether I prefer black or gray more.

    There are other cocker variants too, such as AKAs and Shocktechs, but I know nothing about any of them. Tell me what you think would be the best choice for me. I'd especially like to hear opinions about my top 2 picks, but any cocker recommendation is welcome.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    [Redacted]
    Posts
    1,215
    Honestly, CustomCockers would be the best place for all of your questions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    From back to the mid to late 90s, reliability was dependent upon you the user. Many would swap this part & that part, sometimes for no real performance upgrade over stock. I have used cockers and shooting a well tuned cocker is a glorious feeling. With that, you need to look at how you play. That is the determing factor to good cocker use.

    1) feednecks. If you want a revy and a side feed, that's fine. Some want/need centerfeeds. There is the rub. If you want locking feednecks, even CCM feednecks, either you have to go with something that it already has it or ego feedneck mod the older body. Right or left feeds don't have that problem, yet you have to have elbows. This will eliminate some older cockers.

    2) upgrades. This is a a tricky point. You at least want/need adjustable LPR & HPR. The 4way & rams are less needed. Short throw 4ways like the bomb are great but have you need to balance the switch points with the sear and trigger. Once you learn that balance its fairly easy.

    3) reliability. See above

    4) triggers. This is a point of contention with me. I love sliders and hate pivot and double triggers on them. This is totally on you. I suggest trying to find someone with either that you can try & see which one you like.

    5) Ressurection. I love them. Might be cause i know the man who made them happen. But it is a all in one gun the parts used have been refined that they are pretty much the best(and only new) parts you can have. You also have the customer service of a company STILL in business, which can't be said of others, as well as not having to hoard certain parts. Plus, with a Ressurection, you can have Inception bodies for it.

    Custom cockers is better at this, but its not to say that people here only use one type of gun.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,132
    Of course mags are better.

    If you need a headache get a cocker.....

  5. #5
    Nobody, what do you mean when you say reliability is dependent on the user? Are you referring to tuning and overall maintenance?
    And I tend to play sneaky frontman in recball/woodsball games. I move around a lot and mostly prefer a tight setup. Is there a type of cocker that'd suit my particular style of play?

    1.) I'd prefer centerfeed but I'm totally fine with right feed. It's negligible, really.

    2.) Are stock LPRs and HPRs not adjustable on older cockers? What do adjustable ones do that non-adjustable ones can't?

    3.) See above

    4.) Definitely want a single-finger slider trigger.

    5.) I've heard the same thing about Resurrections - that they're basically a cocker that comes stock with all the best upgrades already on it. Only negative thing I've heard is that the hammer (I think it was) is a bit rough which slightly reduces smoothness in the trigger pull. Other than that, people seem to love them.

    I may register with Custom Cockers if I need further info and my resources here have been exhausted. Thanks guys. And keep those helpful posts coming!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    Nobody, what do you mean when you say reliability is dependent on the user? Are you referring to tuning and overall maintenance?
    Because of the parts used to make an automated pump, there is a balance of you pulling the trigger, which drops the sear, which opens the valve which fires the gun. Then the trigger moves the 4way to switch air to the ram from the closed position to the open and then back again. It truly is a Rube Goldberg machine. The lack of reliability comes from changing one part or taking one part out of adjustment and it can throw off everything. If you get a cocker already set up, like a Ressurection, there is no need, but if you go with an older cocker, it would have a higher chance of part failure.

    So it has more to do with understanding how each part functions AND how they function together. Change or adjust one piece you can get a monster of a blender.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    And I tend to play sneaky frontman in recball/woodsball games. I move around a lot and mostly prefer a tight setup. Is there a type of cocker that'd suit my particular style of play?
    Cocker have length. Add in a cocker with a back block and you have a longer gun. A half or midblock gun does shorten it on the back end but you do miss the back block circulation with each shot. I would highly suggest making friends with a cocker owner and possibly playing with the gun and see what you like and don't like so you can get a feel for the gun.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    1.) I'd prefer centerfeed but I'm totally fine with right feed. It's negligible, really.
    A majority of cockers, baring the Resurrection, will not have a locking feedneck. This can and will limit you hopper choices. On older stock or non-PL cockers, some may get upset if you chop them to retrofit a clamping feedneck. This is a something to look at.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    2.) Are stock LPRs and HPRs not adjustable on older cockers? What do adjustable ones do that non-adjustable ones can't?
    Nope. Sledgehammers and stock HPRs are not externally adjustable. If you have a problem with them, you need to degas, take apart & guess at your adjustment. Those 2 pieces are pretty much the 1st 2 things you change on a stock cocker. On most PL or aftermarket gun, those pieces are already changed. The LPR is in charge of setting pressure to the pneumatics. The HPR can be used two ways. 1, to set velocity, or you set pressure & change velocity with spring tension.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    3.) See above
    Answered above

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    4.) Definitely want a single-finger slider trigger.
    It is a feel. Do shoot one before setting on one. It does take getting used to, as it is a 2 stage trigger. Some like the swing as it easier to some.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    5.) I've heard the same thing about Resurrections - that they're basically a cocker that comes stock with all the best upgrades already on it. Only negative thing I've heard is that the hammer (I think it was) is a bit rough which slightly reduces smoothness in the trigger pull. Other than that, people seem to love them.
    I don't know, but lmk if you are getting one, as i know of one of a shop/field(which we hold Tunaball at) that are masters of the cocker. If you get one from them, they will put a slight massage to help.out the gun. The Resurrection that i used(which is BigEvil's) was done by the field and i didn't feel anything.

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    I may register with Custom Cockers if I need further info and my resources here have been exhausted. Thanks guys. And keep those helpful posts coming!
    While i think i can cover most bases, the more info you get, the more informed you will be when you buy one.

  7. #7
    Just registered with customcockers but I guess I'm not cleared to post anything there yet.

    I have the opportunity to pick up a '98 WGP Autococker. It does have a Benchmark frame (slide trigger) but otherwise appears totally stock. And it's got the front shroud with good condition neoprene and the slant-cut ribs just the way I like it (images are failing to attach to this post for some reason so I can't show you). So old school! Looks like the bees knees, at least to me.

    The only issue with the gun, according to the seller, is that the shroud seems too loose. He doesn't know why, though. It's so bad that apparently it will slide right off the gun when pointing down. I'm pretty infatuated with this cocker already and hope it's an easy fix. So any ideas why this might be happening? Can it be repaired?
    Last edited by ghost flanker; 05-26-2015 at 01:47 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    The front shrowd is held on by a friction fit to the front block. To tighten it, bend it in

    But the 98 is not bad. Other than the pneumatics, any and all internals MUST be for a pre-99 gun. IN 2000, they(WGP) made changes to the internals, so you can not use post 2000 parts. If it is stock on the front block, the ram & 4 way will be brass and the LPR will be all black without an adjustment screw on the front. Also the HPR will have the airline coming into the bottom with no adjustment. It would be the first thing to go, IMO.

    As for what you will need first(but not necessarily needed to use it) would be a new HPR, a spring kit & a valve tool. You can certainly get a Palmer Rock to change out the LPR and then upgrade the 4way and even the ram, but it truly is up to you if you want.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Medford MA
    Posts
    334
    I'll throw this out there - for your first autococker I'd recommend a 2k+ for the ease of having external lug adjustment alone. It's somewhat more difficult to do any meaningful adjustment when you have to pull the hammer out each time you want to adjust the firing point.

    Also- the stock, pre-set "Sledgehammer" LPRs do a pretty good job and are very reliable. You may not be able to get the cycling pressure as low as possible like you can with an adjustable reg but it's a minor disadvantage at worst. I agree that an adjustable HPR is a must-have, more or less.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    98 should have the lug adjustment as it was standard. Only pre97 was it not there.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    St Paul
    Posts
    1,383
    the resurrection is great for a first time cocker buyer/shooter. simon really made the gun as easy to operate and shoot as possible, its an excellent bit of design.

    if you know more about cockers, you can find something similar or better for less money, but its honestly tough to recommend anything else for a first timer because of the ease of use that the Resurrection has.

    for a first timer, id avoid a pre-2000 gun. the gun was updated substantially post 97, and in 2000.

    also you may want to consider a hinge, they are much faster, and more importantly, easier to shoot fast than a slider.
    "because every vengeful cop with a lesbian daughter, is having a bad day, and looking for someone to blame"

  12. #12
    I've identified the gun I'm thinking of getting as a '99 Autococker (the shroud and the bolt both correlate to that particular year).
    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 556
Size:  152.4 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 644
Size:  151.8 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 383
Size:  125.1 KB
    I think the nostalgia is taking hold. I mean, look at it! ...okay, so maybe it's just me.

    A post-2K cocker or a Ressurection may very well be the smarter buy, but my priorities seem to be shifting more towards learning and discovery rather than performance. I almost prefer the handicap of a slower gun, actually. And I've never met a double trigger that I liked, and cocker hinge triggers look particularly ugly to me. Maybe pre-2K cockers are a pain in the ass to adjust but I'm still drawn. The 99's really had most of the kinks worked out, anyway. Right? I guess as long as air leaks and malfunctions are not a constant burden, I'm willing to give it a try. I repair hydraulic machinery for a living so the complexity issue doesn't really scare me - if a whole generation of cocker toting teenage kids who believed in the magic of closed-bolt range and accuracy could figure it out, I think I'll be ok.

    I really intend on keeping this gun all stock, though. If I ever feel like I need better performance on the field, I'll look into a Ressurection or maybe build a post-2k custom cocker. That or I'll just grab something with an X-valve in it.
    Last edited by ghost flanker; 05-28-2015 at 02:15 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    Ok, that is a stock 98/99 cocker with a benchmark 45. Looks clean and unmolested.

    Kudos to you in not jumping into it and changing this and that cause you can. With that, i HIGHLY suggest reading, rereading, and then reading again, Ravi Chopra's Infosheet. Not only is the information contained in it is probably the best cocker reference, but is also more specific to your needs as the 99 cocker was the penicle or subject of it. MCB has a link as i am sure CC will have it as well.

    A whole lot of what i know was gleaned from that and even 15 years after it was written, it still is the best.

    But i will give you a head start. To adjust velocity, you need to do 2 things. How it is set in the pictures, you need to take out the cocking rod(the rod under the bolt on the back block), and turn in or out to change spring tension of the hammer opening the valve. It is a PITA. The other method is to change the air pressure through the HPR. So ditch that and play with it.

    The stock pneumatics are stock. If they work, then you don't NEED to change them. Other than 4way orings, its a fire and forget kinda thing. Some actually perfer the stock pneumatics, as it is one less thing to muck about.

    When you air it up, hold trigger and go for it. Going from mags to cockers, you will need to relearn how to pull the trigger fully again. It is practicing good trigger hygiene. That is nearly direct from Ravi Chopra. So enjoy it. There is nothing like a well tuned cocker, or just a cocker that just shoots. I know, itz heresy to say such things on AO, but its the truth. Totally different, yet equally rewarding.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IN -- USA
    Posts
    9,647
    TechPB did an autococker show of death a while back. It covers the basics and pretty much everything you may need:


  15. #15
    Ha! I just read Ravi Chopra's article on stock Autocockers last night as well as his stock '99 review - that's how I learned to identify a '98 from a '99. His '99 review also dispelled a lot of apprehension and helped significantly with my decision. I was stoked to learn that the specimen I've been eyeballing for the past few days turned out to be a '99. A handy bunch of 411 he's accumulated there.

    What I hadn't seen before was Mike's Autococker Show. What a great resource that footage is! I'll certainly be watching that video while adjusting anything on my soon to be and first Autococker. Thanks a bunch guys!

  16. #16
    Woohoo! Just won the auction for that '99 Autococker.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Medford MA
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    Woohoo! Just won the auction for that '99 Autococker.
    nice! enjoy, man. cockers are fun little guns

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    472
    I was in the same position last year - mag owner since '93 but had never owned or used a cocker. I started with a Resurrection - they are amazingly good for the money. Only things I didn't like were the absence of a back block for the proper sewing-machine effect and also I worried that the Ego-style finger detents would get bent out of shape as the bolt sits forward in storage (no idea if this is true or not!). After that I wanted something with a bit of history and ended up with an early right-feed Evolution, which I added a complete set of modern Belsales pneumatics to. Once you get the hang of how they work, cockers aren't really any more difficult to tech than a mag, just different.

    Name:  2014-11-10 14.17.09.jpg
Views: 981
Size:  166.0 KB

    I mainly play magfed/limited loader games now (max 50 ball gravity hopper) and use both my mag and Evo, although I've found the mag to feed far more reliably when you're using a poor feed system, as the powerfeed maintains a longer ball stack and you can shake an open-bolt gun and have a ball drop into the breech, whereas when you shake a closed bolt gun it just drops a ball above the bolt, so your first shot tends to be a blank!

  19. #19
    Funny you should say that, Gadget - the lack of a back block or that sewing machine sound signature in the Ressurection were two of my biggest reasons for not choosing it, ultimately. Judging from video footage of Resurrections firing, they sure seem quiet - the impacts down range are louder than the shots, themselves! But the '99 has a little more character to it simply because it is louder and sloppier.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by cockerpunk View Post
    the resurrection is great for a first time cocker buyer/shooter. simon really made the gun as easy to operate and shoot as possible, its an excellent bit of design.

    if you know more about cockers, you can find something similar or better for less money, ...
    I was under the preconception that the Resurrection already has the best of everything on it. Interesting. I may look into getting a more capable autococker later on down the line. Aside from ones with a double-finger hinge or E-trigger, what other cockers are better for less money? In what ways are they better?

  21. #21
    Although the resurrection is an excellent out of the box mechanical half block aimed at the newer generation of players, I don't think it appeals as much to those who desire total customization or those who really enjoy tinkering with absolutely everything on their autocockers. Perhaps that is what cockerpunk meant.

    One can buy a cheap, used body and used parts and still build a great shooting autococker.

    I'm not suggesting that the resurrection cannot be customized, as Simon has released custom bodies, but the resurrection just doesn't have as many options at this point in time.

    This is my 98 Belsales Evolution. It took me about 3 years to source all the parts I needed for this build.




    and then there is fun with suction timing...
    Last edited by The Ritual; 05-30-2015 at 04:34 PM.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    St Paul
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost flanker View Post
    I was under the preconception that the Resurrection already has the best of everything on it. Interesting. I may look into getting a more capable autococker later on down the line. Aside from ones with a double-finger hinge or E-trigger, what other cockers are better for less money? In what ways are they better?
    building a cocker yourself, you can make a better gun for far less money.

    but that requires knowing exactly what parts to buy at what price, and how to install and set up the gun properly etc etc.

    used is almost always cheaper than new in paintball, and in cockers, its huge.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brookfield CT
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    Of course mags are better.

    If you need a headache get a cocker.....
    Having owned a cocker, they can be a huge headache. They shoot well when in tune, but idk how many of you on here are musicians or firearms enthusiasts. A cocker can be like an old finicky guitar. One day it will play like a beast and the other, it will chop or misfire like crazy and you can know everything about a cocker and still be absolutely befuddled on what's wrong with it. Certain hammers suck on them. Cocking rods bend. Bolts wear out quickly on them. A well tuned mag is like an ak-47. You can keep it in storage for close to 10 years and it will still fire. I personally have an xvalve that sat since 2006 and aired it up for the first time and it cycles. A mag is a very well engineered gun. Tom Kaye really is a genius.

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    Of course mags are better.

    If you need a headache get a cocker.....
    Yeah, I thought having a pneumatic Karni would be cool. So I traded for one and fixed it up, but could never get it to really work correctly. The velocity was always fluctuating and the ball would roll out the barrel. But, I still loved Karni. So, after failed attempts messing with it more and more, I said screw it, and actually paid big bucks and bought a brand new, unused Karni on ebay, to see if they worked correctly, straight out of the box. Low and behold, the brand new Karni had all the same problems as my old used Karni, and then exploded and jammed. So now, they're wall hangers for the moment, until I feel like having some more headaches. I suck at autocockers!

  25. #25
    Going through this right now, building one after owning two that worked great out of the box, without fiddling. Finally got it timed after a week of screwing around, now it won't fire over 150fps. Another week of messing with springs, yay!

    That said, I'm insane. I put cocker frames on mags, polish sears, change trigger rod and on/off pin lengths, etc. All the things one should never ever do. Somehow, though, my mags work perfectly every time I pick them up. I credit TK for making a stupid-resistant product.

    Here's hoping the cocker eventually "just works"...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,132
    Good luck with that.

    You know what they say, "hope in one hand, spit in the other, and see which hand fills up first".



  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,056
    Cockers have their limitations, where if you change a part or adjust it, it can throw the entire gun out. Everyone is different.

    The biggest change would be the detent. The cocker has a true anti-double feed. Because of the closed bolt design, it will load a ball, then push it passed into the breech. You definitely need to watch bore sizes with your barrels. Years ago, Lapco made cocker to cocker barrel backs that were sized smaller to prevent this. Better barrels or more proliferation of smaller barrels makes this unneeded, but point your barrel down and you will loose a paintball.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,245
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    Good luck with that.

    You know what they say, "hope in one hand, spit in the other, and see which hand fills up first".


    Where do you come up with these?

    Oh, yeah... south Florida
    Stay Classy, AO...
    BEO: RIP / Topgun Paintball: RIP / Old MCB: RIP

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    St Paul
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by evil1 View Post
    Having owned a cocker, they can be a huge headache. They shoot well when in tune, but idk how many of you on here are musicians or firearms enthusiasts. A cocker can be like an old finicky guitar. One day it will play like a beast and the other, it will chop or misfire like crazy and you can know everything about a cocker and still be absolutely befuddled on what's wrong with it. Certain hammers suck on them. Cocking rods bend. Bolts wear out quickly on them. A well tuned mag is like an ak-47. You can keep it in storage for close to 10 years and it will still fire. I personally have an xvalve that sat since 2006 and aired it up for the first time and it cycles. A mag is a very well engineered gun. Tom Kaye really is a genius.
    mag owners get such a blind spot for this kind of stuff.

    mags lost there bullet-proofness with the lvl 10 and the ULT. both need to be near constant adjusting to work optimally.

    let us not forget that unfamiliarity is not unreliability.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IN -- USA
    Posts
    9,647
    Quote Originally Posted by cockerpunk View Post
    mag owners get such a blind spot for this kind of stuff.

    mags lost there bullet-proofness with the lvl 10 and the ULT. both need to be near constant adjusting to work optimally.

    let us not forget that unfamiliarity is not unreliability.
    I respectfully disagree. 10 years with the same ULT and Level 10 setup - used the gun about a month ago, JUST started leaking. Otherwise, problem free.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •