Need some feedback on what kind of frame you would like to see me manufacture.

[Darring D]

It wouldnt be if it didnt accept CCM panels. A shortened 90* would be fine, but there has to be an alternative to aluminum panels. IMO.

I took the panels off all my CCM 86* frames and run Hogue wrap around grips on them.
Click me to see hogue grips

[mpsd]

I think an 86* that takes CCM/Hogue grips would be cool because no-one ever did it for a Mag so far. 90* frames are aplenty already, be it tall (Logic / RPG / VER / M90) or short (Logic UMF / RPG Triton).

So, if you are going to do new, do it new indeed!

Just my .02

[sQuidvision]

im not too hung up on the angel... 90* is cool with me too... but the CCM frames are very comfortable in the hands, and the ability to use their panels would be a nice plus.

If you take anything from my posts though let it be that a single trigger frame would be super!

[mpsd]

Well, the last single trigger frame developed for a Mag was the CF one, developed on the early 90s, ~20 years ago. So, yeah, I agree that it would be cool to have a new one as well. I dream about an e-pneu, single trigger Mag. Use it with some light ramping and you have the ultimate sleeper Mag!

I want one for this Mag:

[Frizzle Fry]

90* single frame... Mechanical..

The Angel one is SO nice and SO comfortable.

[knownothingmags]

i am definently on board with the single trigger pneu frame.
that would be sweet,

i am definently over the 90* frames.

but whatever you make will be good.

i will not be buying another 90* frame not my style.

[OPBN]

i am definently on board with the single trigger pneu frame.
that would be sweet,

i am definently over the 90* frames.

but whatever you make will be good.

i will not be buying another 90* frame not my style.

I don't truly see the point of another single trigger 45*. Benchmarks are still made and CF's are abundant. A single 90 or 86 is the only thing that is currently unavailable for an Automag.

[mpsd]

Single / Modular 86* FTW!!!

Hey, Luke, why don't you start a poll?

[knownothingmags]

I don't truly see the point of another single trigger 45*. Benchmarks are still made and CF's are abundant. A single 90 or 86 is the only thing that is currently unavailable for an Automag.

oh i see what you are saying, a single trigger 90*?
that would be different.

[OPBN]

oh i see what you are saying, a single trigger 90*?
that would be different.

I actually like the idea of a modular like MPSD is saying. A 90 with an optional single or double trigger guard.

[dboggs79]

86 or 90, single trigger, snatch and "universal" (pneu,mech,ep).

[Syko89]

Emag y-frame but I think the board is the problem here not the frame

[renie]

A 90 frame would be nice or a decent looking 45 :)

[BTAutoMag]

I think you should make this:

One thing I regret is never getting around to having that one frame I designed produced.
Totally ULE'd, the frame would have made for one of the lightest setups ever because you can get rid of the rail.
I'll bet if the frame were made from glass-filled nylon it would fantastically light... and still no rail.

I'd be up for producing a few prototypes if someone had the capabilities... all my personal machines are not CNC.

This version of the design isn't completely ULE'd... it has a cutout for an MPA-3 pneumag piston directly under the on/off and a tab for easy mounting of the MSV-2.
Notice the cutouts & holes to accomodate a sear directly in the frame.


This was a plainer version with an integrated 15 degree foregrip.
This frame could have also accomodated a sear.

[mpsd]

I think you should make this:

Well, that was my very first suggestion if you look above.