PDA

View Full Version : Feednecks



_tMAN
08-25-2004, 11:50 PM
Hello all, I have some feedneck questions, your help would be appreciated.

I have my emag with ULE body and original feedneck. None of my hoppers seem to want to stay in there snugly (is that a word in proper usage?). I know there are a couple of feednecks out there, but I don't really know much about them. I was thinking something more like a tippmann feedneck that you can clamp together. Can anyone point me in the right direction here?

ryanshep
08-25-2004, 11:53 PM
id suggest a rogue strangler, or a ccm. basically any feedneck thats angel threaded will work

_tMAN
08-25-2004, 11:55 PM
Do you think you could link me to them? I know they are somewhere down in the dealers forum, but I am really bad at searching.

If you could I would :hail:

Muzikman
08-26-2004, 12:04 AM
I suggest the Check-It, CCM, or when it is done for the ULE Mag, the BartParts No-Rider

_tMAN
08-26-2004, 12:10 AM
Linky Linky Pwease?

ryanshep
08-26-2004, 12:23 AM
Your lucky im nice and didnt tell u to search (http://www.automags.org/forums/showthread.php?t=136290&highlight=rogue+strangler) :mad: :p

_tMAN
08-26-2004, 12:27 AM
ryanshep Thanks a bunch man, but where are my other links! :mad:

just kidding, I think I found some others too. Thanks for that one

Muzikman
08-26-2004, 12:29 AM
They are Angel threads, so...

CCM - http://www.chipleymachine.com/feednecks.html#0

Check-It - http://www.checkitproducts.com/fla/index.htm

BartParts - www.bartparts.com <-- Does not have the feedneck for the ULE Mag (Angel) yet, but should soon.

_tMAN
08-26-2004, 12:37 AM
Thanks Muzik and ryanshep, that was exactly what I was looking for.

Now to decide :rolleyes:

Halliday
08-26-2004, 12:31 PM
It's pricey, but the CCM neck is the best one I've ever used.

fire1811
08-26-2004, 12:39 PM
check-it or CCM

_tMAN
08-26-2004, 12:48 PM
Yeah that's what it is between now. Has anyone used the check-it?

fire1811
08-26-2004, 12:50 PM
yes i have a check-it on my angel
i have owned both ccm/checkit
i personally prefer check-it