You ever just feel the need ...

[lopxtc]

To have to attach your Glock to the underside of your M-16, MP5SD6, etc? Well problem solved;

http://www.hsgear.biz/Universal+Tactical+Attachment+for+Glock+Pistols.ht ml

Aaron

[fire1811]

hmm that would definatly be something i would try before i bought it.
i just dont think it would work very well.

[gimp]

haha. That reminds me of the simpsons, where Moe turns 1 gun into 5 guns. You know, to hunt todays modern super animals like the flying squirrel and the electric eel.

[oldsoldier]

I see no tactical advantage to that whatsoever. A pistol serves two purposes: one, it is a backup to the main firearm. Two, it can be used in tight places, where a long gun is too unwieldy. By attaching it to the front of the weapon, it kills both these. Plus, you have to re-learn to shoot.




And, it looks pretty gay.

[BobTheCow]

$330 for a rail? Yeesh...

[PyRo]

You can buy my duct tape version for $15.99 :)
Includes one roll of duct tape, enough to do 50 guns!

[splatattack33]

only law enforcement and military :rolleyes: hmm my dad just retired form the navy after 25 years hmm i wonder if he can get one of these or if my military id would work when i get older

[Cheeseball24]

You can buy my duct tape version for $15.99 :)
Includes one roll of duct tape, enough to do 50 guns!

does that come in camo for the 1337 glock snipez0rs?

[ubooze]

This basic idea has been floating around in my head, except I was thinking using a bracket that attaches to the grip frame from above to the rail.

The only purpose this could really serve would be fire while you reload the assualt rifle. Think, you can still pull off a couple shots, since the handgun would be steadier thanks to the stock, while you change clips.

Just an idea.

[reese0351]

The only purpose this could really serve would be fire while you reload the assualt rifle.

Best option would be to learn how to reload your assault rifle quickly. If you're good you can get it down to about 2 seconds without magazine retention.

[HoppysMag]

i see it as a tacticle option. keeping the ability to have a silenced weapon and a heavyer weapon all in one. in total id say its still stupid