PDA

View Full Version : GM vs Bill Gates



dj89
02-13-2005, 10:24 PM
" For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way
computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo
(COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto
industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer
industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to
the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release
stating:

If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars
with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a
new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would
have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the
car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some
reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your
car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to
reinstall the engine.

5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable,
five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five
percent of the roads.

6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be
replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning
light.

7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and
refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned
the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna

9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to
drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same
manner as the old car.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off. laugh.gif "
http://img183.exs.cx/img183/8075/disclaimer6pl.gif

teufelhunden
02-13-2005, 10:44 PM
http://img183.exs.cx/img183/8075/disclaimer6pl.gif

Got that right.

By like, 3476 years.

matt-o
02-13-2005, 10:55 PM
i found it funny, im sure they took it uber-seriously though

Hexis
02-13-2005, 11:08 PM
I think they got over it last century when it circulated the first time.

gc82000
02-14-2005, 08:55 AM
I think they got over it last century when it circulated the first time.

Are you sure??

I still find it fuuny Especially number seven.

Hexis
02-14-2005, 06:40 PM
Pretty sure. Decade old jokes tend to not sting so much.

FYI this originally made the rounds when Windows 95 came out, yes, ten years (a lil less) ago. There was much confusion about the "Start" button being the way to log out. Heck, COMDEX didn't even happen this year.

Chris42050
02-14-2005, 07:56 PM
You people are hilarious. He even puts a disclaimer and you still b____ (female Dog) about it being old. What is so hard about hitting the Back button on your computer instead of the post button. And, why do you ALL have to whine about it. One person is plenty. Do you feel cool because you have allready heard this before. Do you really have to chime in everytime you have heard or read something before. JUST HIT THE BACK BUTTON. Its not hard. :D

Hexis
02-14-2005, 08:34 PM
Pot, Kettle, Black?

Target Practice
02-14-2005, 08:53 PM
People should need a license to use the Internet to prevent this kind of thing.

teufelhunden
02-14-2005, 08:55 PM
You people are hilarious. He even puts a disclaimer and you still b____ (female Dog) about it being old. What is so hard about hitting the Back button on your computer instead of the post button. And, why do you ALL have to whine about it. One person is plenty. Do you feel cool because you have allready heard this before. Do you really have to chime in everytime you have heard or read something before. JUST HIT THE BACK BUTTON. Its not hard. :D


Pot, Kettle, Black?


What he said.



And also because it's dj89.

Target Practice
02-14-2005, 08:58 PM
And also because it's dj89.


Yeah, that too.

MantisMag
02-14-2005, 10:12 PM
well it WAS funny when i heard it five years ago. of course gm never issued any such press release. bill gates may or may not have said his part but he definitely wouldn't have named gm specifically.

Chris42050
02-15-2005, 07:12 PM
Pot, Kettle, Black?
I was fully aware of my hypocrisy, hence the smiley. Yet my question remains. Why does it take so many thread Nazi's to tell someone thier thread is a repost? I think 1 is plenty. :cheers:

Hexis
02-15-2005, 08:28 PM
Calling a joke this old a "repost" is unfair (in a bad way) to reposts everywhere. This joke is so old it predates common forum use on the Internet. This (and any other similar) forum would be toast if folks reposted every odd joke that has ever circulated the intenet.