PDA

View Full Version : Automag v. Autococker



kornbread
03-28-2006, 10:20 AM
I'm mostly a woodsball player. I want a reliable and consistant marker, and I've been looking at the Tac One.

It seems like just about everyone at our local field has an autococker, and I was just wondering what are the differences between a comparable mechanical autococker and a Tac One. To be honest there is one thing that I really know about autocockers, and that is that I don't like how they look. Other than that I don't know much about them. :)

What are the main differences?

thanks :clap:

shades
03-28-2006, 10:38 AM
Too much to get dirty an foul up with a cocker when you are playing in the woods. Also, if you drop it or hit against a tree you can Knock it out of time. Too many moving parts.
A Mag has one major moving part (the Bolt) and that is enclosed. THIS is the NUMBER ONE reason that Mags are awesome IMO. Simple in function. Quality made. Tough. and MAD fast (fastest accually). Heck the WHOLE marker IS the Valve. No little tubes hanging around to get caught in the brush and twigs like on the rock no a Cocker.
If you MUST have a closed bolt get the BEST. A Blazer. (http://www.palmer-pursuit.com/catalog/blazer.htm)
It has Quality and closed bolt and all the mechanics are enclosed in the marker.

RapidTransit
03-28-2006, 11:27 AM
An Autococker in the simpelest form is a semi-auto pump gun. Think about how overly complicated that concept is and decide what's best for you.

Little_Ho
03-28-2006, 12:19 PM
Hi

I would choose a Mag over an Cocker, in my Team there are quite a few Mech Cockers. They all ended up to be timed or fixed.

the most comen Problem is the 3way. Dirt and Damaged O-rings. After you install new O-Rings you need to time it.

I would go with the mag. I used several Mags and I love them. The most People underestimated the Mag in the Woods. My Setup:

http://webpages.charter.net/littlehosc/Paintball/Marker/Mags/X-Valved%20ULE%20Mag/Full.jpg

I know its a smal pic but you can figure out what its looks like.....

The most thing I like is, I go to a Field and they Kiddies starting to stare at the Frame And then Ill get comments like how did you get a Angle Frame on that thing what is it or wow is that a new Angle??????

Little_Ho

Asym
03-28-2006, 12:48 PM
I now own an automag and a cocker and prefer the mag, but there are pros and cons to both types of guns.

Both have a trigger system that you have to get used to. You have to make complete pulls on the mag or you shortstroke, on a cocker you have to do the same or sometimes it won't catch the hammer on its loading cycle, this is related to timing but on the new trilogies you can't adjust the timing only the length of your hammers sear catch which will give it a longer feeling pull.

Only the classic valved mags should be used with CO2 and most don't recommend it. I used CO2 for years and it worked perfect with mine. The RT/X valves require HPA tanks. All mags are considered high pressure, classics should have 600+ PSI and RT/x need 800+ PSI. Cockers should be run with a reg, newer low end trilogies like the sport come without a reg but has a more restrictive valve installed so its not required(this is the main reg, not the low pressure reg for the cocking system that is requred). The cocker can be run low pressure, this makes it much easier to run CO2 with a good reg that will handle it.

"If" a cocker is setup properly it will be more efficient than the automag, so more shots per tank.

I like the size and feel of the mag more than the cocker. Try both out if you can to see which you do prefer.

neppo1345
03-28-2006, 01:25 PM
it all comes down to one issue:

Elves make cockers shoot further

that is all.

-tim

kjjm4
03-28-2006, 01:27 PM
I have been a cocker owner for 5 years, but only recently bought a mag. I always see posts about how cockers are unreliable, break all the time, etc, etc, etc. The truth is, they are very reliable. 90% of the time, when they break down, its because the user messed them up by messing with something when they have no clue what they're doing. I have only had my cocker go down 1 time when I was playing with it. I am primarily a scenario player, I play in the woods, and when its cold and wet, too. I wouldn't really consider myself abusive of my markers, but they do get used.

Between cockers and mags, reliability is a non-issue, in my opinion. Routine maintenance (cleaning and oiling) and maybe an occasional o-ring replacement, are all you'll really need to do.

The primary differences between the two are feel and design. A mag is smaller, but not lighter. They both have their pros and cons. I like them both. Try before you buy, and see which one you like.

Cow hunter
03-28-2006, 03:32 PM
I have been a cocker owner for 5 years, but only recently bought a mag. I always see posts about how cockers are unreliable, break all the time, etc, etc, etc. The truth is, they are very reliable. 90% of the time, when they break down, its because the user messed them up by messing with something when they have no clue what they're doing. I have only had my cocker go down 1 time when I was playing with it. I am primarily a scenario player, I play in the woods, and when its cold and wet, too. I wouldn't really consider myself abusive of my markers, but they do get used.

Between cockers and mags, reliability is a non-issue, in my opinion. Routine maintenance (cleaning and oiling) and maybe an occasional o-ring replacement, are all you'll really need to do.

The primary differences between the two are feel and design. A mag is smaller, but not lighter. They both have their pros and cons. I like them both. Try before you buy, and see which one you like.
id agree, but what do you do when your cocker needs a tune up or you have a new part? messing with a cocker is inebitable, and they are problematic sometimes. i have used both and prefer the mag for its looks, feel, trigger, speed, upgradability, and durability. just recently to spite me, three of my friends went and bought cockers, a prostock, a system X, and a trilogy. that was a month ago, now they wished they listened to me and bought a mag. all three have had problems, not touching them mind you, sitting in a gear bag they became messed up somehow. two of them have gotten new markers and the third cant sell his. i do love the feel of cockers, and would recomend them for people who will actually care for their marker, but the mag is just so much easier to care for.

Bozark
03-28-2006, 03:57 PM
If you play woods ball, an Autococker will work great aswell, just get a front block cap for it (they're like 10 bucks) and you'll be set, not to bash mags, cause both are amazing. in the end, it all comes down to what you want to do.

Big Boy
03-28-2006, 04:04 PM
I personaly love autocockers, but I love mags as well. If you don't know what you are doing with a cocker though, it is not for you. They are two completely different guns, the way they work are just....way different...

kornbread
03-28-2006, 08:10 PM
I'm all about simplicity, which is one reason I am leaning towards the automag. The second reason I have been leaning toward the Tac One is that apparenlty with the level 10 bolt, little elves carefully chaimber each paintball.

Let me know if these assumptions are correct. Thanks.

PS Thanks for all of the feedback!

Stealth Fighter
03-28-2006, 08:36 PM
No chops with a Level 10 almost guarunteed if tuned correctly, now a autococker on the other hand, that is another story.

Surestick
03-28-2006, 09:32 PM
Well, if the 'cocker is tuned correctly you can get it to pinch balls instead of chopping - essentially mechanical anti-chop like the lvl 10.
Of course it's not as easy as installing a lvl 10.

cowboy_00
03-28-2006, 10:25 PM
Emag...

Sometimes in the woods (im a purely scenario player) you need to able to lay some cover fire down. and there is nothing better for it then switching to hyper hybrid and opening up a can-o' 25-35bps-whoop ***.

but even if you just leave it in mech mode to conserve its pretty quiet and depending on your setup it low-profile and light.

Some ppl like the purely mechanical tac one. but just get an Emag and put a tac one body on it.

that way you get the best of both..

I love my emags.


just my 2.

p.s. Our team shop now has 3 other peoples autocockers while we almost never have a broken mag come in.

PnueMagger
03-29-2006, 12:45 PM
When I play woodsball, I like to use my cocker because it has a flatter trejectory allowing it to shoot further is some scenarios where there is brush. My mag tends to "lob" balls which is adventageous for indoor play or speedball games where the extra range isn't necessary. It all comes down closed bolt accuracy. Bud Orr even states they are "the most accurate markers in the world".

So if you are buying for strictly woodsball, get a cocker. The timing issue is overrated. In fact, I often tine mine between every other game. It only takes 5 mins. As far as looks, there are infinate external upgrades to make your gat a contract killa.

syl58
03-29-2006, 12:47 PM
i play woodsball and have both. they are simlar in performace, but i prefer the mag because there is less that can go wrong. Go with the mag, but the cocker is going to be cheaper

ThePixelGuru
03-29-2006, 01:22 PM
When I play woodsball, I like to use my cocker because it has a flatter trejectory allowing it to shoot further is some scenarios where there is brush. My mag tends to "lob" balls which is adventageous for indoor play or speedball games where the extra range isn't necessary. It all comes down closed bolt accuracy. Bud Orr even states they are "the most accurate markers in the world".
Oh man, please don't bring this **** up again. Any marker will have the same trajectory as any other provided they're at the same velocity and you're not using an Apex/Flatline/Z-Body/whatever. It's simple physics. Also, closed bolt isn't more accurate (WARPIG proved it), and of course Bud Orr says they're the most accurate in the world. What company/manufacturer/rep doesn't?

Also, kornbread, keep in mind you're asking the 'cocker vs. 'mag question on Automags.org. You'll probably get totally opposite answers if you ask over on Air-Powered.com. It's personal preference. Basically, if you like tinkering, get a 'cocker, if you want to be able to beat up someone's car with your marker, get a 'mag.

PnueMagger
03-29-2006, 01:41 PM
How do you figure PixelGuru? The Closed bolt design is the whole concept behind the acuracy/efficiency of a paintball gun. Even the new shockers have the new SFT "seal forward technology" AKA (closed bolt).

Surestick
03-29-2006, 02:51 PM
The Closed bolt design is the whole concept behind the acuracy/efficiency of a paintball gun.

Consistency, good paint (round) and paint to barrel match are what gives you accuraccy.
None of those have anything to do with closed vs open bolt.

Stealth Fighter
03-29-2006, 03:52 PM
Well automags shoot flatter because they blow forward, autocockers just blow. ;)

ThePixelGuru
03-29-2006, 04:42 PM
How do you figure PixelGuru? The Closed bolt design is the whole concept behind the acuracy/efficiency of a paintball gun. Even the new shockers have the new SFT "seal forward technology" AKA (closed bolt).
And the whole concept of rifled barrels is to spin the paintball, creating a vortex behind it and keeping the paintball going straight. That doesn't mean it works.

EDIT: And I doubt any marker company or rep would claim their particular bolt system gets more range. Unless they're Smart Parts. Or Jack Wood. Probably some others, too. In these cases, physics is wrong. :rolleyes:

ThePixelGuru
03-29-2006, 04:47 PM
Found the WARIPIG thing. Link (http://warpig.com/paintball/technical/paintguns/balistic/closedopen.shtml).

By testing under controlled circumstances we were able to isolate the subject of our test (the bolt operation) from the other variables involved. Firing our marker as an open bolt, blowback operated semi-automatic, we found the same level of accuracy, as when firing as a manually operated closed bolt marker. Our conclusion - the great "inherent accuracy" of closed bolt markers over open bolt markers is a myth.

FinchMan
03-29-2006, 04:58 PM
and the shocker SFT is just a marketing ploy. The "seal forward" in a shocker is just like any other open bolt gun. the bolt is still in motion when the air is released. The "great accuracy" of closed bolt guns would come from the ball being perfectly still in the breach when the air is released.

RapidTransit
03-29-2006, 08:19 PM
So if the ball is moving its gonna change its tragectory when pressure is applied :spit_take

Cockers are said to be more accurate because of my previous statement that Cockers are a semi auto pump. They based this philosophy on the wrong fact of why pump guns are more accurate.

Drop a ball in a funnel which way is it gonna go at the end?

Dark Frost17
03-29-2006, 09:17 PM
I started off with a mag in woodsball and use it for everything.....but started to build a cocker jsut to see what they are like.....2 Different Worlds of working!!!

Coralis
03-30-2006, 01:07 AM
One major thing you can say that a mag has over a cocker is that someone with little or no airsmithing experiencing can strip down a mag and replace all the oring and reassemble the mag in less than a half hour and this will fix 90 percent of the problems a mag will have ..... (well a classic valved mag anyway)

Recon by Fire
03-30-2006, 01:17 AM
Just get the Tac One! It is better all around than any mech autococker. More durable, more reliable, faster, and better looking. Make sure you get the ULT and an adjustable HPA tank if possible.

On the other hand, get the autococker if you plan on using CO2.


Ever time an automag? :rofl:

kornbread
03-30-2006, 01:37 AM
Also, kornbread, keep in mind you're asking the 'cocker vs. 'mag question on Automags.org. You'll probably get totally opposite answers if you ask over on Air-Powered.com.

I have actually tried a couple of times to post on air-powered.com and apparently I don't have the necessary permissions. It actually made me fill a bit silly, since I'm an IT major, that I coudn't figure out how to post there. I probably need to talk with a mod.....

Thanks for bringing up the good point. :clap:

peteralexander78
03-30-2006, 02:34 AM
I have bought 4 mags. I have had a classic and an X valve. The best thing about a mag is the level 10. I live in washington state. It rains a lot here. I played one day with my friends that have angels, timmys, shockers, cockers. All of them are having problems because of the rain. Paint is breaking in their barrels and from the bolts. :cuss: I was the only one that played the whole time with out any problems. :clap: I also have a friend that is always getting his cocker fixed. He has a revenge and it is very nice. Shoots around 180psi. He can get a lot more shots off his tank than I can. Well it would be nice if my mag was like that but I would rather have reliablity over more shots off a tank. I wouldnt trade my mag for a $1500 gun. No, I would. But then I would just sell it and buy a really nice mag! :shooting:

ThePixelGuru
03-30-2006, 02:47 AM
One major thing you can say that a mag has over a cocker is that someone with little or no airsmithing experiencing can strip down a mag and replace all the oring and reassemble the mag in less than a half hour and this will fix 90 percent of the problems a mag will have ..... (well a classic valved mag anyway)
I'd say 'cockers are just as easy, at least if you're pulling it apart completely. They're not tougher, just more spread out and it takes more tools. Anyone can learn pretty fast if someone just shows them what to do, and that's the only way people should learn to strip down markers anyway.

Coralis
03-30-2006, 11:00 AM
I'd say 'cockers are just as easy, at least if you're pulling it apart completely. They're not tougher, just more spread out and it takes more tools Sorry but I have to throw the BS flag on this. Maybe an experienced tech could but not Joe Noob off the street.

ThePixelGuru
03-30-2006, 03:13 PM
Well, it was just as easy for me, at least. I'm fairly mechanically inclined, though, so it all just makes sense to me and I've never had any trouble learning to strip down any marker. Still, it's not very tough. You can see most of parts right in front of you before you even start. And if a knowledgable tech-type teaches someone how to strip down a 'cocker, it should be pretty easy to learn.

Miscue
03-30-2006, 11:46 PM
Wow... there hasn't been a Mag vs. Cocker thread in a while.

famousgamer
03-31-2006, 08:38 PM
Mags are a barrel with a grip attached to it, and a little simple mechanism that is installed in the rear of the barrel to make the paintballs travel.

Cockers are a tad more complicated. Well, maybe more than a tad...

Same results, only one is simple and one is complex. Do the math.

ThePixelGuru
04-01-2006, 04:18 AM
Right, but simple means you can't tinker so much if you're that type. Not much to mess with in a 'mag valve, but the 'cockers got loads of aftermarket goodies. Pneumatics, internals, you name it. The 'mag has the ULT and the X-Valve. Of course, you could argue the Automag has so few internal upgrades because it's perfect...

Dryden
04-01-2006, 11:28 AM
Automag:

http://www.javelindirect.com/images/mrkSol_photo.jpg

Autococker:

http://www.gamleys.co.uk/images/mousetrap_3.jpg

Infurious1
04-02-2006, 05:40 AM
i used to have a mag heres a pic of it
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e17/infamous01/ee_1.jpg

heres what i sold it for
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e17/infamous01/KIF_8835.jpg

i actually like my cocker more, even though it hurts to say ti, cause that mag was my first gun ever, and it won me alot of games and respect

kornbread
04-04-2006, 12:12 AM
i actually like my cocker more, even though it hurts to say ti, cause that mag was my first gun ever, and it won me alot of games and respect

Why exactly do you like it better than your Mag?

ThePixelGuru
04-04-2006, 04:40 AM
Ugh, a Trilogy? Damn dude, that's barely even a real 'cocker.

EDIT: Not a Trilogy, I'm just stupid. Dunno why I thought the hose was coming out of the foregrip and totally didn't see the 3-way...

PnueMagger
04-04-2006, 09:25 AM
that' not a trilogy (i think).
I though the trilogy has an unadjustable 3-way(actually 4-way). That one clearly has a standard 3-way with the trigger rod just running thru the the grip.

BTW: is that the new '06 swing frame? They look nice but i've never shot one. How do those '06 frames shoot?

Dark Frost17
04-04-2006, 06:53 PM
thats not a trilogy....

syl58
04-04-2006, 07:13 PM
05 prostock, looks like the stock 05 wgp hinge frame, i love my mag way more than my too-many-things-can-go-wrong cocker.

mobsterboy
04-04-2006, 07:23 PM
...heres proof Im dumb and shiny things attract me
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e17/infamous01/KIF_8835.jpg

Im very sad I got rid of my mag, because without it, i am not a man. Every night I cry myself to sleep and am tormented by mag owners bunkering me


NOTE HERE: He's still an anime loser and he still looks gai

no, in all seriousness and referring to the topic question: "Is an apple like an orange?" They are both nice guns. Some state the "mags = no timing and no hassle". I had a cocker, I really liked it too. You wanna know why i liked it so much? I didnt f#$% with it. The major problem is kids like /\the above who get one because its shiny and its got lots of parts. Never once do they think about the functions of it, the way it works or the fact taht they are SOL usually when they do take it apart. Mags arent bad guns either, I have a Dallara'd Hyper Xvalved Custom mag(thread somewhere in pb talk). If i had the cash and I didnt like my old school 2001 Dark Angel Pred, I would go and rebuild a nice little raceframed cocker.

Dark Frost17
04-04-2006, 07:42 PM
some people like my self cant help but to take things apart or to build them to find out how they work......i built mine to have a better knowing about them....they are not as much as a hassele as people make them out to be.......just dont bash them around.. :tard: ...

this is the 1 i am building
http://www.jayloo.com/files/pics/35000/autococker2_tn.jpg (http://www.jayloo.com/photo_gallery/show_pic.html?pIMAGE_ID=35613)
body is still raw just polished untill i figure out a color to anno it.... :rolleyes:

but this is one of my fav.
http://www.jayloo.com/files/pics/34000/my_mag_tn.jpg (http://www.jayloo.com/photo_gallery/show_pic.html?pIMAGE_ID=34988)

both are fast :shooting:

syl58
04-04-2006, 07:55 PM
i wasnt an idiot and didnt mess with anything, but things like chopping, more places to leak, eventual un-timing without thread lock, short stroking (alot easier on cocker), veloctiy adjusting is a pain (w/o dialer), the list goes on.


and then theres always the mystery autococker accuracy, which for the most part is untrue, i dont know how this came to be, really good hype i guess

Infurious1
04-05-2006, 07:01 PM
that' not a trilogy (i think).
I though the trilogy has an unadjustable 3-way(actually 4-way). That one clearly has a standard 3-way with the trigger rod just running thru the the grip.

BTW: is that the new '06 swing frame? They look nice but i've never shot one. How do those '06 frames shoot?

umm i wish i could tell u how the 06 frames shoot, but i only have an 05 prostock and the trigger shoots pretty nicely ive only tested t a couple times so far though

and mobsterboy or cockboy what ever your stupid name is i just want to thank u for proving to me that there are alot of stupid ppl who post in forums, maybe the reason u didnt mess with your cocker was because u were too retarded to understand the simplicity of timing it right , and hey dont flame me u dont even know how long i have been playing paint ok

im just sorry that i have to deal with people like u and i want to apologize to everyone for me taking up thread space

mobsterboy
04-05-2006, 09:17 PM
To mobsterboy:
my name is Isuckcockboy

here are my problems:
a) maybe the reason u didnt mess with your cocker was because u were too retarded to understand the simplicity of timing it right
again, noobs with allen keys ruin the reputations of cockers
b) and hey dont flame me u dont even know how long i have been playing paint ok
see below



Oh, your a 2k6er, its ok, your allowed to post dumb crap like this

btw, ive timed my own cockers, then I didnt mess with it, because i didnt want to unnecessarily time my cocker again. See above, and you'll understand why i say "Dont mess with it". And again, your a 2k6er, its ok, i dont have to flame, you just flamed yourself. Tell me you've been playing for longer than 4 years and then you can talk.

PnueMagger
04-05-2006, 11:16 PM
and mobsterboy or cockboy what ever your stupid name is i just want to thank u for proving to me that there are alot of stupid ppl who post in forums, maybe the reason u didnt mess with your cocker was because u were too retarded to understand the simplicity of timing it right , and hey dont flame me u dont even know how long i have been playing paint ok

im just sorry that i have to deal with people like u and i want to apologize to everyone for me taking up thread space

C'mon, this isn't PBN. There's no reason to be flaming vets. Especially with you're second post here. Just keep the criticism constructive and you'll find these forums some of the best around. Welcome to AO I guess.

finnmanpa
04-13-2006, 01:24 PM
I own both a '95 Mag and an '02 Cocker. Both are bone stock. I have two Crossfire 68/3000's, one for each, and have Freak backs for both to use my Freak kit.

I benched them in a vise one day for comparison. (So I have a lot of free time) Each gun had the same tank, as stated above, and used the Freak barrel system, each with a 16 inch TearDrop tip, and the .695 insert in each. I used the same batch of fresh RP Marbalizer paint.

I cronoed each gun to 280 fps.

Each gun was tested individually, using the same vise. The ends of the barrels each time were 18 inches from the edge of the vise, and 8.5 inches off the table. To top it off, I used a laser level to make sure the barrels were vertical.

Each gun, when fired from the vise, could consistently hit a milk gallon I had put on a post 100 feet away, usually 9 out of 10 times. Sometimes 10, sometimes 8, but paintballs aren't perfectly round either.

Free standing I can empty my 200 round VL Revy hopper through each gun in about 20-21 seconds, so don't tell me one gun shoots faster.

The Tac One is in a league of its own, it is very fast.

The trigger pull on the Cocker is slightly lighter, but the travel is longer.
The trigger pull on the Mag is slightly heavier, but the travel is noticeably shorter.

The new ultra lite Mag trigger, I've heard great things and tried a few! Very nice,lightens up the trigger pull greatly. The Tac One has this mod.

I get more shots from my tank with my Mag than my Cocker, so the Mag uses less air.

The Mag has less internal moving parts than the Cocker.

The Mag has NO external moving parts, unlike the Cocker.

The Mag is way smaller, more compact, and weighs less than the Cocker.

Now, all this being said, I hope my house burns down!! That is the only way my wife will justify me getting a new Tac One, which I want so badly. "You already have 3 nice paintball guns" she says. I am so whipped.

VFX_Fenix
04-14-2006, 12:20 AM
The Mag is way smaller, more compact, and weighs less than the Cocker.


I dunno what you're talking about "way smaller"

Physical dimensions of a Cocker are 22X6.5"
Physical dimensions of a Mag are 22X6.5"

Both with a Cocker threaded CP 14" barrel hanging off the nose.

Measurements were taken from extreme range of the Back Block (i.e. all the way back) or velocity nut to the tip of the barrel and from the top of the body to the bottom of the trigger frame.

Trigger frame placement is almost identical from rear of the gun to trigger frame (based on .45 style frames). Forward grip placement is also similar (E-Mag battery pack vs. Inline reg).

Measurements were taken from an E-Mag and a 99 Cocker. Pictures avalible uppon demand.

You might have a case with weight, I'm not 100% sure weighing an E-Mag vs. a Mech Cocker would be a fair comparison, though if it came down to it I could weigh my RT Pro and Cocker (though the newer cockers are lighter). Actually let's find out, shall we?

Verdict - Since "weighs less" was also a claim.

E-Mag no barrel w/ CP Rail - 2lb. 15.8 oz
99 RF Cocker no barrel w/ SP Rail and plastic elbow - 2lb. 15.1oz
RT Pro Custom no barrel and no rail - 2lb 4.9oz

Consetions -

Current Cockers are lighter than their '99 counterparts because of increased milling both internally and externally. E-Mag and RT Pro both weighed with same Valve and Body, Rails were both RT Pro rails, Inteliframe used on RT Pro.

Conclusion -

RT Pro and current generation Cockers are most likely of similar weights and have nearly identical physical major dimentions (22X6.5"). Cockers have a shorter effective length because of differences in Back Blocks and because the back block measurement was from the loading and not firing position. Bodies are smaller for MAgs though overall hieght remains the same due to Automag Rail system.

Edit: It should also be noted that the physical gun dimensions when not in a playing configuration are actually very different when speaking of length. The pneums on the AC make the gun effectively 3" longer than a Mag (10.25" vs. 13.125" w/ CCM pneums). Removing the front block however does return both guns to having similar dimensions again.

kornbread
04-14-2006, 12:26 AM
Now, all this being said, I hope my house burns down!! That is the only way my wife will justify me getting a new Tac One, which I want so badly. "You already have 3 nice paintball guns" she says. I am so whipped.

Just so you know, your not alone. :cheers: I'm still trying to convince my wife that I need a Tac One instead of a Tippmann. She is very aware that all of my friends have Tippmanns and they work fine, but I'm not a Tippmann person. I like to be different.

Thanks for the insight. I like hearing from people who have done some serious testing instead of people who state "My friend has________ paintball gun and it stinks." Which interpreted means "My dogs, aunts, cousin owned one (I think) and he traded it for something else."


BTW My wife is a pretty cool chick, she does let me play more than my friends wives do! :clap:

magbackforgood
04-14-2006, 03:26 PM
Kornbread i have owned both mags and one auotcocker. i bought a new 2003 Kapp reflex autococker. The black to clear fade was what most attracted me. not the autococker or that i heard it shoots farther or anything else. Well i sold the autococker last month on ebay and bought two automags. When i sold my mags to buy the cocker i thought i would like it. i just like mags better , i get more elims, and i am just more comfortable with a mag in my hand. Way more comfortable than when i was using the cocker. One thing to consider is whether or not you will like the center feed on either gun. i myself like the powerfeed bodies better. if you get mag a must is the level 10. i maybe chopped i ball in 4 to 6 cases of paint. thats maybe also because i short stroked it. Hope this info helps.

paintball-lizard
04-16-2006, 03:52 AM
Mags all the way , a few of my buddies have cockers and spend all their time fixing them imo.

slasherdan
04-18-2006, 10:16 AM
Well lets just say I have been cutting down on my collection ...

I had a RT ULE ... Loved the gun ... didn't use it that much because I enjoy using my Phantom to much.

Well I got my collection down to a 98c, A-5, Phantom ....

I'm picking up my E-Tac today from AGD HQ ....

My wife will kill me if she even finds out, but I just couldn't resist the little devil on my shoulder saying "Do it!!! Do it!!! Do it!!! You know you want to!!!"

I think the devil and the little chamber loading elves are working together.

If I knew I was going to be breaking on an E-Tac I would have kept the Halo hopper I had on my RT ... but that went as part of my auction ....

Oh well ... Looks like I have to sell some of my other crap cause I don't think I'm selling my guns anymore .... Plus the remaining pump guns I have that need to be serviced are going to my Pump Clubs spare pool for people that want to try the Pump concept out.

rtfire1
04-18-2006, 11:58 AM
Just a quick note I us an RT pro x valve mag.

I have worked on both cockers and mags the first mag I worked on was 5 years before I got mine. Cockers can be easy or they can be hard to fix. I had a kid with a nice one come to me with a box of parts he had brought his cocker to a "cocker shop" to have them fix it and do some mods. The shop charged him a $100 bucks and he got it back in a box of parts. Long story short the guy put it back together wrong. It was the first cocker I worked on and with the printouts it was not hard to work on. On the other hand if I got a box of mag parts I would have it working in no time. I like the mag for the easy setup and easy to fix but there are nice cockers out there

o an after using my old mag 9 of the people i play with are now mag owners.

Aslan
04-20-2006, 01:25 AM
I'd have to vote Mag. I realize there have been some posts like, "Cockers aren't that hard to take apart/operate once you get used to them."

Well, that's true. I've heard that once you've timed one 7 times you pretty much can do it with no problem. And, to be fair...I'm sure timing a cocker is no more disasterous than installing a Level X. The difference is, you only really need to install a level 10 once...you need to time a cocker every time you completely strip it down.

I recently bought a cocker...sort of a project gun...I just want to learn about them. I'm hoping they won't be too hard to use...but I think it's just a matter of getting used to them.

kornbread
04-20-2006, 09:50 PM
I'm not much of a tinkerer. When I get a gun set up I like to keep it that way and not have to make any more adjustments to it if I don't have to. This is the main reason I'm looking at a mag. I've had a lot of people ask me why I'm not looking into a tippmann, but the simple fact is that I don't really like how they look or feel.

b e n
04-20-2006, 10:22 PM
Lets put it this way, I just traded my CMM e2 cocker for a mech mag :clap: Cockers arnt that hard to mantain but they just have so many things to mess with and leak and with mags theres one reg, no timeing, no tuneing, no respringing, and more potential for high proformence. I dont not like cockers but I feel there starting to show their age and are too complicated to be reliable. All that being said I will prolly get a old cocker for cheap to mess with because cockers have backblock mojo :headbang:

electriceel125
04-21-2006, 06:45 PM
Its all about the feel... I would rather shoot my cockers than any of the many mags i have owned because i prefer the feel. (barring the dallara it was just plain SEXY)

Floodbait117
10-10-2019, 10:57 AM
I have both have no used my mag yet but from a hopefully unbiased stand point they do the same thing in diffrent ways mags seem to be a pick up and go where as cocker function best in the hand of a competent tinkerer so if you like to tinker get a cocker if you just want a marker you can just go with get a mag they both are great platform and can both do amazing things so can we stop the debate and say they are both great markers

going_home
10-10-2019, 12:13 PM
13 years, seriously ?

AGD won the race.

Nuff said.

Buh bye.

;)

AnthonyW
10-10-2019, 01:04 PM
I’ve owned & sold 20 autococker and still have a pile of Automags, over the last 20 yrs my Mags have been much more reliable than any and every cocker I have ever owned only one exception is my CCM 6.5 pump!!! Mags for Life!!! [emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

knownothingmags
10-10-2019, 02:15 PM
13 years, seriously ?

AGD won the race.

Nuff said.

Buh bye.

;)

his name is floodbait117 the word bait is in it. lol.... and im adding to it.