View Full Version : warp vs. qloader
patfl1
02-08-2007, 12:00 PM
I just traded for a warp body, which is best. Thanks in advance for your input.
Thanks,
Patrick
[email protected]
Loguzzzzzz
02-08-2007, 12:17 PM
Well, I am sure it is a preference but I like the q loader. Lighter and no batteries.
The only draw back (for some) is they only hold 100 balls.
I have been using them for 3 years now and love them. The capacity has never been a problem for me. I carry one pod in the gun and 4 pods in a pack.
Just my $0.02
Loguzzzzzz
LegumeOfTerror
02-08-2007, 12:18 PM
warp is heavier, but uses regular hoppers and pods.
q loader is lighter, but uses special pods, is time consuming to load, and have a limited 100 round capacity.
geekwarrior
02-08-2007, 12:18 PM
I prefer the qloader...the warp is just to much extra weight and i couldnt get it mounted so that it felt right
Mescalito
02-08-2007, 12:26 PM
.....is time consuming to load....
If you ditch the 500 rnd silo and use a revy to feed the paint to fill your pods it takes next to no time at all.
Loguzzzzzz
02-08-2007, 12:35 PM
warp is heavier, but uses regular hoppers and pods.
q loader is lighter, but uses special pods, is time consuming to load, and have a limited 100 round capacity.
The q loader is the pod. The socket is the pod holder.
Mescalito is right, I use a Halo to load my pods, it takes seconds per pod.
patfl1
02-08-2007, 10:16 PM
Wow...I thought on this forum, it would be adg all the way. Thanks to all you guys for the input!
paintballfiend
02-09-2007, 11:07 AM
How much does a warp feed weigh anyway?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.