Weird I-Frame milling

[behemoth]

Got this in a 3rd party trade i brokered.

Never seen one like this:

http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q243/htomeheb/Picture-2.jpg

Prototype? Custom Cut?

It doesnt have the ribs cut in the back, either.

I remember all the stages of the I-frame, when they were being designed, but i dont remember this one.

Anyone?

[punkncat]

I'm not seeing it..... :confused:

[ß?µ£ §mµ®ƒ]

Theres a larger hole behind the trigger

[behemoth]

Theres a larger hole behind the trigger

and where the guard meets the top of the frame,

[ß?µ£ §mµ®ƒ]

oh yeah look at that, there should only be one bend but theres two hmm well i guess as long as it work neh?

[geekwarrior]

must of been TK's...he was walking the trigger and his fingers bumped the guard, putting a perfect bend in it.

[behemoth]

must of been TK's...he was walking the trigger and his fingers bumped the guard, putting a perfect bend in it.

Yeah, okay.

[punkncat]

Its not a prototype.

Thats the way they are coming now. There are no comestic ribs on the back, and youll notice the trigger guard is thicker too. And of course the peanut cut-out is a bit larger too.

They are only available in AGD flat/dust black individually or on Tac-Ones. At least for now :ninja:


Guess that's why I didn't notice, as the last one I owned looked exactly like that.

[Chronobreak]

Its not a prototype.

Thats the way they are coming now. There are no comestic ribs on the back, and youll notice the trigger guard is thicker too. And of course the peanut cut-out is a bit larger too.

They are only available in AGD flat/dust black individually or on Tac-Ones. At least for now :ninja:

was there any particular reason for the change?

or to be attempt a more "ule look"

[behemoth]

Its not lighter, actually 1/10 of an ounce heavier as I recall. Maybe 2/10's.

If I were to venture a guess, its faster/easier to machine that way.

Oh, thats goofy.

I'm thinking its old, turns out its just new.

Lame, They shoulda just kept it as is.