PTP Micro Emag stock or ULE'd

[flyingpootang]

Which do you think looks better and will retain more of it's value.
(1) A stock PTP Micro Emag
(2) With ULE lowers and a CNC pac
(3) Hybrid PTP lowers CNC batt pac (unable to poll)
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/4/9720185236.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic/7952784)
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/4/9720185255.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic/7952785)
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/4/9721154763.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic/7953031)

[Sumthinwicked]

one all day im a stockler for stock stuff and il ike the top one betta

[Madmarx]

Which do you think looks better and will retain more of it's value.
(1) A stock PTP Micro Emag
(2) With ULE lowers and a CNC pac


Looks Better
(2) With ULE lowers and a CNC pac
Should retain more value
(1) A stock PTP Micro Emag

Actually after looking again I'll say ULE lowers w/ PTP pack would look the best

Who did your feedneck mod?

[sandfreestyle]

ULE lowers w/ PTP pack would look the best

Agreed

[Chrishew09]

Oh thats a hard one, but i like the ULE lowers and CnC batt. pack.
A black X-Valve would really set it off. :D

[Mechanic79]

The CNC battery pack has curves that throws off the rest of the PTP style. Keep the Stock battery pack for sure. You could swap grip frames with no aesthetic issues.

[A-Tach-One]

I think the body looks best on the stock PTP lowers.

[ah137]

(2) With ULE lowers and a CNC pac

[Madmarx]

ULE lowers w/ PTP pack

Add that to the poll and I'll vote :headbang:

[flyingpootang]

Oh thats a hard one, but i like the ULE lowers and CnC batt. pack.
A black X-Valve would really set it off. :D

Just added
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/4/9721154763.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic/7953031)

[TnDeathInc]

i like the stock one

[Geronimo7]

Stock

[MANN]

Just added
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/4/9721154763.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic/7953031)

this one. the cnc pack matches the curves of the body. IMO

[mpsd]

Agreed

Agreed too.