cockerpunk
06-22-2008, 08:44 PM
today me and bryce did some chrono testing with paint to barrel match, using my Emag.
this gun is a machine. no joke, we were getting some setups (meaning paint to barrel matches) where the gun was shooting less than a standard divation of 2 fps.
assuming the consistency is a normal distribution, this means that 99% of all shot fired with that setup would be within +/- 5 fps.
20 balls per case, would be over +/- 5.
thats it.
that is simply amazingly consistent. i mean there is alot of talk on the interwebz about guns shooting +/- 2 and such, but in my 8 years of playing i have to own, shoot, or see a single gun even match the automag.
heres the spreadsheet - http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pp1UimQwRsMngwmAygIkHfQ
updated spreadsheet - http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pp1UimQwRsMngwmAygIkHfQ
after some more measurements of the barrel backs, well be fixing it. but it does raise some very interesting questions about paint to barrel match.
this gun is a machine. no joke, we were getting some setups (meaning paint to barrel matches) where the gun was shooting less than a standard divation of 2 fps.
assuming the consistency is a normal distribution, this means that 99% of all shot fired with that setup would be within +/- 5 fps.
20 balls per case, would be over +/- 5.
thats it.
that is simply amazingly consistent. i mean there is alot of talk on the interwebz about guns shooting +/- 2 and such, but in my 8 years of playing i have to own, shoot, or see a single gun even match the automag.
heres the spreadsheet - http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pp1UimQwRsMngwmAygIkHfQ
updated spreadsheet - http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pp1UimQwRsMngwmAygIkHfQ
after some more measurements of the barrel backs, well be fixing it. but it does raise some very interesting questions about paint to barrel match.