PDA

View Full Version : Heckler & Koch suing paintball companies



MANN
06-08-2009, 12:33 PM
stolen from MCB


Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. BT Paintball Designs, Inc.
Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-H09-689B
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00689-DFH-TAB
File Date: Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian J. McGinnis, Darlene R. Seymour of Continental Enterprises
Defendant: BT Paintball Designs, Inc.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge David Frank Hamilton
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

__________________________________________________ _______________

Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Tippman Sports LLC et al

RFC Case Number: T-H09-560T
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00560-WTL-TAB
File Date: Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian J. McGinnis, Darlene R. Seymour of Continental Enterprises
Defendant: Tippman Sports LLC
Tigerstripe Paintball LLC
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker
__________________________________________________ _____________

Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Precision Airsoft, LLC

RFC Case Number: T-H09-485P
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00485-SEB-JMS
File Date: Monday, April 20, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Darlene R. Seymour - Attorney at Law
Defendant: Precision Airsoft, LLC
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Referred To: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
__________________________________________________ ___________

Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Professional Arms, LLC

RFC Case Number: T-H09-387P
Court Case Number: 3:09-cv-00387-AC
File Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul G. Dodds of Brownstein Rask Sweeney Kerr Grim
Defendant: Professional Arms, LLC
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta
__________________________________________________ ____________

Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Coharie Arms, Inc.

RFC Case Number: T-H09-184C
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00184-RLY-JMS
File Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Darlene R. Seymour - Attorney at Law
Defendant: Coharie Arms, Inc.
Special Weapons, Inc.
Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Richard L. Young
Referred To: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Notes: NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Superior Court, case number 29D02-0810-PL-1323.

I am assuming that it is for some of the milsim markers/accessories that come on some markers. Not sure exactly what it is going to affect. Defiently intresting tho.

chafnerjr
06-08-2009, 12:41 PM
stolen from MCB
I am assuming that it is for some of the milsim markers/accessories that come on some markers. Not sure exactly what it is going to affect. Defiently intresting tho.

It's a trademark suit, so the "look" is probably what they are going after... Other than that I have no clue, interesting.

DevilMan
06-08-2009, 12:43 PM
I would say the "EXACT REPLICA" and "JUST LIKE THE REAL THING" are what they are after. Trying to make sure that the TRUE HK line isn't mixed with the PB stuff.

DM

robertsr1811
06-08-2009, 01:26 PM
HK has licensed their trade dress to an airsoft manufacturer, so this is in protection of that licensing.

If they weren't in the business at all it wouldn't matter to them, the more things that look HK the better, but they're in the airsoft biz now from a licensing standpoint and they need to protect their assets.

SCpoloRicker
06-08-2009, 01:45 PM
I am going to be buying an HK USP Compact. Not sure on the caliber, it's between 9mm and .45.

/got nuthin

Loguzzzzzz
06-08-2009, 02:48 PM
I am going to be buying an HK USP Compact. Not sure on the caliber, it's between 9mm and .45.

/got nuthin
Go with the .45 cal way more knock down power.

I have a USP tactical and that is the most accurate hand gun I own (besides the .22 cal Ruger Mark III bull barrel) and I am almost as big a firearm whore as I am a Paintball gun whore. I believe the current count is 23.

For the record, I have the HK and a 1911 A1 ang the HK kicks butt over the 1911 A1 I have 2 9 mili's too and prefer to grab and shoot the .45 cal.

http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/images/ssi/medium/15368.jpg

Rudz
06-08-2009, 02:54 PM
Go with the .45 cal way more knock down power.

I have a USP tactical and that is the most accurate hand gun I own (besides the .22 cal Ruger Mark III bull barrel) and I am almost as big a firearm whore as I am a Paintball gun whore. I believe the current count is 23.

For the record, I have the HK and a 1911 A1 ang the HK kicks butt over the 1911 A1 I have 2 9 mili's too and prefer to grab and shoot the .45 cal.

http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/images/ssi/medium/15368.jpg

Crap...they let YOU buy guns....oooh man, when are u adopting me? Paintball, forearms, cool cars, rv, motorcycles, dirtbikes, trucks....crap I'm such a better son than daniel!!!

Watcher
06-08-2009, 03:00 PM
Go with the .45 cal way more knock down power.


Wow, rly? I wasn't aware they made bullets with "knock down power".




From what I heard, H&K is suing Tippmann and BT for use of the fire selector switch and the depiction of "no bullets", "one bullet", and "many bullets".



Oh, and Kimber Custom 1911s kick the USP's butt!

Lohman446
06-08-2009, 03:10 PM
Go with the .45 cal way more knock down power.

I have a USP tactical and that is the most accurate hand gun I own (besides the .22 cal Ruger Mark III bull barrel) and I am almost as big a firearm whore as I am a Paintball gun whore. I believe the current count is 23.

For the record, I have the HK and a 1911 A1 ang the HK kicks butt over the 1911 A1 I have 2 9 mili's too and prefer to grab and shoot the .45 cal.

http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/images/ssi/medium/15368.jpg

Really? While I appreciate that position if one was going to take it all the way they would argue that there are superior rounds to both available in handguns (10MM anyone?), and both rounds are VERY anemic on the grand scale of things. The fact of the matter is, for all the differences in "power" touted by the defenders of one or the other pistol rounds are far more alike than not.

I've bounced around on both sides. Not being a fan of the .40 in any gun I have shot I never seem to make a final decision on the one I like.

Loguzzzzzz
06-08-2009, 03:23 PM
Crap...they let YOU buy guns....oooh man, when are u adopting me? Paintball, forearms, cool cars, rv, motorcycles, dirtbikes, trucks....crap I'm such a better son than daniel!!!Get in line my son!

:D



Wow, rly? I wasn't aware they made bullets with "knock down power".




From what I heard, H&K is suing Tippmann and BT for use of the fire selector switch and the depiction of "no bullets", "one bullet", and "many bullets".



Oh, and Kimber Custom 1911s kick the USP's butt! Sorry if I used a term you disagree with, I have heard it referenced this way in the past. Please enlighten me if I have misspoken. :hail:

Are you saying that you would prefer a 9mm to the .45 acp?

Not too familiar with the Kimber Custom but they seemed to be comparably priced in today's market. A very fine piece I am sure. Fortunately I purchased my H&K Tactical quite a few years ago, paid under $1K for it.

Smoothice
06-08-2009, 03:28 PM
Get in line my son!

:D




I'm first in line right? Pops ;)

Loguzzzzzz
06-08-2009, 03:34 PM
Loh,

I was only commenting on the calibers that SC mentioned. I agree that a 10 mm would be more powerful.

I have never shot a 10mm but I have shot a .40 cal before and I was not too impressed.

I suppose for pure punch I could dust off my S&W Model 29 8-3/8", my Ruger Super Blackhawk 10" SS or my Desert Eagle .44 magnum! Unfortunately when I was actively buying firearms there was no .50 cal DE yet or that would be in my aresenal. By the way the Desert Eagle is a load to haul around. Better work the biceps to lug that beast!

:shooting:

The funny part is that you would think that H&K would be flattered to have their guns depicted in Milsim.

Go Figure! :confused:

Lohman446
06-08-2009, 03:48 PM
Loh,

I was only commenting on the calibers that SC mentioned. I agree that a 10 mm would be more powerful.

I have never shot a 10mm but I have shot a .40 cal before and I was not too impressed.

I suppose for pure punch I could dust off my S&W Model 29 8-3/8", my Ruger Super Blackhawk 10" SS or my Desert Eagle .44 magnum! Unfortunately when I was actively buying firearms there was no .50 cal DE yet or that would be in my aresenal. By the way the Desert Eagle is a load to haul around. Better work the biceps to lug that beast!

:shooting:

The funny part is that you would think that H&K would be flattered to have their guns depicted in Milsim.

Go Figure! :confused:

:) I think that all the numbers show that all the carriable pistols are jokes in far as stopping power. Shoot what you can be proficient with and are comfortable with. The get a XX caliber pistol because it has more stopping power while technically accurate is really a false argument. Shoot both, buy what you like .

Loguzzzzzz
06-08-2009, 04:10 PM
Shoot both, buy what you like .I completely agree with that sentiment! I happen to shoot closer groups with the H&K .45. That is what drove my original comment!

:cheers:

Lohman446
06-08-2009, 04:17 PM
I completely agree with that sentiment! I happen to shoot closer groups with the H&K .45. That is what drove my original comment!

:cheers:

Best shooting gun I ever had was a Sig in .357. Don't know why I ever sold that. Great instinct shooter, was just "right".

WenULiVeUdiE
06-08-2009, 05:04 PM
If they weren't in the business at all it wouldn't matter to them, the more things that look HK the better, but they're in the airsoft biz now from a licensing standpoint and they need to protect their assets.

Eh, not really.

First, intellectual property is worthless if you do not protect it.
Second, yes, it can hurt H&K and the gun industry as a whole. H&K cannot determine who or under what circumstances their products are represented if other companies are making products that directly mimic those of H&K. Without that control, people may mistake an A5 for an actual MP5.

rx2
06-09-2009, 01:45 AM
:) I think that all the numbers show that all the carriable pistols are jokes in far as stopping power.

This reminds me of an interesting story. Our department uses 9mm +P+ Hydra-Shoks. One of our guys fired a round into the chest of a felon, from about five feet away. The round deflected off of a rib, traveled through his abdomen, and severed his liver. After being hit, the guy looks at him, and exclaims "mother :cuss: , you just shot me!" Of course, on the other end of the spectrum, we have had people killed with .22s. Shot placement is key, and a little luck never hurts.

As for 9mm vs. .45 - I can shoot either. For use at work, I kind of appreciate the higher capacity of the 9mm. For target, I like the fact that the .45 gives you a larger hole, thus making borderline shots count as bullseyes (although it does feel kind of cheap to get points that way). I don't expect either to take down a wet-head with one shot, though.

Watcher
06-09-2009, 02:27 PM
Sorry if I used a term you disagree with, I have heard it referenced this way in the past. Please enlighten me if I have misspoken. :hail:

Are you saying that you would prefer a 9mm to the .45 acp?

Not too familiar with the Kimber Custom but they seemed to be comparably priced in today's market. A very fine piece I am sure. Fortunately I purchased my H&K Tactical quite a few years ago, paid under $1K for it.


Well, I always roll my eyes when people say something like "knock down" or "knock back" power because every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If the bullet knocks down your target it would knock down you.

"Stopping power" is the correct term to use.


A lot of people would say the 1911 design is outdated, but it is a solid platform and Kimber Custom highly improved on the quality and features.

For example, the Kimber 1911s have 5 safety functions. 3 operate off of a thumb switch and 2 operate off of the grip-safety.
The thumb switch slides up into a grove which prevents the slide from moving, at the same time it blocks the hammer from moving, and it blocks the trigger from moving.
The grip safety blocks the trigger from moving, and has a pin which travels up through the slide and activates a block for the firing pin preventing it from moving. This is in case the pin would get jostled and fire the pistol by dropping it or something.

When you relax the hammer, it doesn't fully drop down. It stays in a "half-cocked" position. Another safety feature.

1911s by design are very thin, and as long as you don't mind the weight they can be very small.


If you got a USP for under $1000 then that was a great buy. It is a great handgun in a great caliber, though in the modern price tag and by my personal preference I would take a Kimber 1911 9 times out of 10 over a USP.


I am a fan of .45 :shooting: 9mm is horrible :cry:




I was never a huge fan of H&Ks stuff, but they do make a good product in most respects.
I think their 416 is a way better system than the M4/AR15/etc and their G36 is very well designed.

But then again, I always heard that the company was made up of jerks and all the diehard H&K fanboys are the kind of people who say "HK" not "H and K" and if you think otherwise you are an idiot...

Lohman446
06-09-2009, 02:44 PM
I am a fan of .45 :shooting: 9mm is horrible :cry: ...

Elaborate. And when you quote stopping power I expect you to actually look at the charts and understand how woefully anemic any standard handgun is. PS - all my 9MM defensive handguns are full of Barnes tipped Corbon ammo.


How are we defining stopping power? Analysis of the data from past shootings? Muzzle energy statistics?

The muzzle energy as listed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzle_energy of a 9mm is in the 350 ft lb range. .45 ACP in the 400. 44 Mag clear up to 1000.

The muzzle energy of a .204 Ruger is 1308 ft lbs

The point is - neither cartridge alone is going to do you a lot of good. There is no magic handgun, especially one that you can reasonably carry. Put the right bullet in the right spot and, with a little luck, you might be ok. Better yet, be prepared and do your best to stay out of situations where it might be needed.

As has been said by some before. If you know you are going to be in a gun fight bring a 12 gauge.

Don't get me wrong, I like my Kimber, I like the idea of a .45 hole in the end of the barrel if I ever have to point it at someone. Still, it quit being my primary carry some time ago.

GRimm
06-09-2009, 04:15 PM
The term knock down power makes me laugh and reminds me of the show Future Weapons and how much of an idiot the host is when it comes to firearms.

SCpoloRicker
06-09-2009, 07:13 PM
Man, that was an effective threadjack I pulled off here. ;)

Lohman446
06-09-2009, 07:34 PM
Man, that was an effective threadjack I pulled off here. ;)

One of the all time best :). You managed to keep a thread mentioning legal events and paintball in the same post from derailing into an SP fest

Watcher
06-09-2009, 10:51 PM
Elaborate. And when you quote stopping power I expect you to actually look at the charts and understand how woefully anemic any standard handgun is. PS - all my 9MM defensive handguns are full of Barnes tipped Corbon ammo.


I never mentioned stopping power in a comparison of a pistol load to a rifle load, I just detest the term "knock back" power or any variation on that.



I just don't like 9mm. Sure there are some types of 9mm ammo that are good to use but speaking in terms of standard loads .45 is much better at stopping an attacker than a 9mm will ever be.

I've even seen accounts where a 9mm shot to the head failed to be fatal and caused a concussion with no actual puncture of the skull. That is why they train many cops to continue to shoot until the attacker drops, because 1 9mm round usually isn't enough to bring someone down.

.357 sig, .44mag, even .40S&W I would take over a 9mm.

Then again I prefer a nice 7.62mm to a 5.56mm. Any particular reason? Well, the 5.56 in my eyes only has velocity to hold above the 7.62.

cockerpunk
06-09-2009, 11:42 PM
knockdown/stopping power is a myth anyway.

the bullet will simply over penetrate if it has left over energy.

i personally think any gun that lets you practice enough to put lead on target is going to be infinitely better then any other gun. for some people that is the 9mm, and for some that is the .45. but dont lie to yourself thinking the .45 is going to do much more damage, its primarily just going to over penetrate. really the largest factor in terms of damage is going to be a hit or miss, and then the bullet itself shape and ability to disperse energy. the 9mm can be and is just as effective as the .45 in 90% or more cases.

Lohman446
06-10-2009, 06:46 AM
I never mentioned stopping power in a comparison of a pistol load to a rifle load, I just detest the term "knock back" power or any variation on that.



I just don't like 9mm. Sure there are some types of 9mm ammo that are good to use but speaking in terms of standard loads .45 is much better at stopping an attacker than a 9mm will ever be.

I've even seen accounts where a 9mm shot to the head failed to be fatal and caused a concussion with no actual puncture of the skull. That is why they train many cops to continue to shoot until the attacker drops, because 1 9mm round usually isn't enough to bring someone down.

.357 sig, .44mag, even .40S&W I would take over a 9mm.

Then again I prefer a nice 7.62mm to a 5.56mm. Any particular reason? Well, the 5.56 in my eyes only has velocity to hold above the 7.62.

Taking the 44 Magnum out of the equation as not available in a carryable platform the beleif that those other rounds are substantially better than a 9MM are exagerated at best. That was the purpose of the numbers on ME I put up, to simply illustrate that. Officers with .40s 357 sigs, and 45s are taught the same thing

I have yet to find a .40 in a platform I am happy with. The substantial additional recoil in the carryable platforms (personally I feel the thing is a far less manageable recoil than a .45) is not worth the very minimal additional "stopping power". A term I am still not sure what we are using to denote in this conversation. Personally I would carry my 10MM Glock, but the added width does not fit my hand as well as other pistols, nor does it conceal well.

MANN
06-10-2009, 06:55 AM
Taking the 44 Magnum out of the equation as not available in a carryable platform

you tellin me I cant carry my 14" long 5 shot single action 44 magnum. :(

XM15
06-10-2009, 07:45 AM
I remember when the Kimbers first came out. I ran out and bought one for $550 The early guns where one heck of a deal. A semi custom gun at a production gun price. Its the one gun that I regret selling.

fierymartel
06-10-2009, 08:09 AM
LOL, I got a 9mm. I figure if the 9mm don't knock em down I oughtta be able to after I put a few in em.

Slippy
06-10-2009, 04:35 PM
Now that everybody has given their opinions here are some facts.

The energy equation is 1/2*M*V^2=E

The average pistol fight is 3 yards

An average .45 ACP loaded with a 230gr** round is going about 900 fps the energy for that cartridge is going to be 511 ft-Lbs (it has the energy to lift 511 lbs to a height of 1 foot.

An average 10mm Auto round loaded with a 180 gr round is going about 1250 fps it has the energy of 624 ft-lbs.

An average .40 S&W with the same 180 gr round is going about 950 Fps it has the energy of 361 ft-lbs

An Average 9mm Luger with a 124 gr round is going about 1075 fps, it has the energy of 315 ft-lbs

An average .44 magnum loaded with a 240 gr round is going about 1300 fps, it has the energy of 900 ft-lbs

These aren't my math they are straight out of hornady's reloading handbook***

.45s, .40s and 9 are a dime a dozen.

If your partial to the 1911 (which I am) Kimber and Para-Usa make some of the best pistols for the money. Kimber are accurate as hell and Paras have double stack mags (anybody who don't like that aint never been in a gun fight)

If you like tactical tupperware (glocks) the 23 in a .40 is a nice package, 16 round mags with a 3.5 in barrel is a great concealed carry. They also make one in 10mm

Beretta's 92 (M9) is very popular its also made in .40 with the 96

Springfield Armory makes some nice 1911s but their XD is their better half (if we're not talking rifles) The XD(M) with 16+1 in .40 and 19+1 is worth switching to the smaller calibers.

Colt makes the delta elite which is a 1911 chambered for 10mm auto.

The new S&W M&Ps are nice but S&W are notoriously bad with triggers, 12 lb pulls yikes!

H&K makes some of the nicest polymer pistols out there, the SEALs love them, but there original appeal of Hi-Cap .45s has been lost with the advent of better magazine springs and such that the extra money for the H&K really isn't worth it over the Glock or XD, (the XD .45 one more than the HK)

If you shoot for accuracy get yourself a 1911. If you want a gun that is easy to maintain get one of the polymer jobs. I've seen glocks go 5000 rounds without cleaning.

If I could make a personal recomendation I would get a .45 or 10mm, when the zombies are coming straight at you you can't rely on your accuracy to hit the heart on the first hit, take some with enough juice to keep them down.

"If your shooting stance is good, Your not using cover properly"---Unknown



**1lb is equal to 7000 grains


***All of these velocities and energy numbers are averages. somebody can load these rounds to shoot really hot and such so a .40 S&W could be loaded to do what a .45 ACP is capable of, but if your just buying factory ammo this is what you will be getting.

JAM
06-10-2009, 04:53 PM
handguns are handguns...

get the one you shoot the best.

I prefer 9mm 'cause it's cheap which allows lots of practice and I like the higher capacity.

If i could only use non-hollowpoint ammo, a .45 would be my choice because of the bigger wound, but with modern hollowpoints, the semi-auto handguns are pretty much on close footing:

http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Misc_Images/DocGKR/Handgun_gel_comparison.jpg

JAM
06-10-2009, 04:58 PM
H&K makes some of the nicest polymer pistols out there, the SEALs love them...

SEALs are issued Sig Sauer 226's in 9mm


If I could make a personal recomendation I would get a .45 or 10mm, when the zombies are coming straight at you you can't rely on your accuracy to hit the heart on the first hit, take some with enough juice to keep them down.



Everyone knows you have to shoot zombies in the HEAD. ;)

SCpoloRicker
06-10-2009, 05:54 PM
SEALs are issued Sig Sauer 226's in 9mm

Er, as of a few years ago, SEALs were shooting Mark 23s and USPs to my knowledge.

/meme alert
//I used to work for [the SEALs], so I'm really getting a kick out of a lot of these replies...

Lohman446
06-11-2009, 07:23 AM
Now that everybody has given their opinions here are some facts.

The energy equation is 1/2*M*V^2=E

The average pistol fight is 3 yards

An average .45 ACP loaded with a 230gr** round is going about 900 fps the energy for that cartridge is going to be 511 ft-Lbs (it has the energy to lift 511 lbs to a height of 1 foot.

An average 10mm Auto round loaded with a 180 gr round is going about 1250 fps it has the energy of 624 ft-lbs.

An average .40 S&W with the same 180 gr round is going about 950 Fps it has the energy of 361 ft-lbs

An Average 9mm Luger with a 124 gr round is going about 1075 fps, it has the energy of 315 ft-lbs

An average .44 magnum loaded with a 240 gr round is going about 1300 fps, it has the energy of 900 ft-lbs

Gee, statements of ME, what a novel concept. I think your "average" 45 230 grain going at 900FPS is a bit off. Corbons +P spec on a 230 grain is 950FPS resulting in 461 ft lbs of energy. Corbon numbers being what they are list 115 grain 9MM in the 434 ft lbs

Hornady lists 230 grains loaded to standard to be doing 850FPS - the equation puts that out to 369ft lbs. 230 @ 900 = 414

Not to call ME the end all be all, but I figured it was at least a formula that could be used to show how far off the 45 / 9MM debate was. They are more alike than different

Slippy
06-11-2009, 05:13 PM
Gee, statements of ME, what a novel concept. I think your "average" 45 230 grain going at 900FPS is a bit off. Corbons +P spec on a 230 grain is 950FPS resulting in 461 ft lbs of energy. Corbon numbers being what they are list 115 grain 9MM in the 434 ft lbs

Hornady lists 230 grains loaded to standard to be doing 850FPS - the equation puts that out to 369ft lbs. 230 @ 900 = 414

Not to call ME the end all be all, but I figured it was at least a formula that could be used to show how far off the 45 / 9MM debate was. They are more alike than different



These numbers were straight out of Horandy's Reloading Handbook, however its only the 4th edition and your numbers may be more accurate

cockerpunk
06-11-2009, 06:34 PM
the extra energy is worthless if it goes into the wall behind the target. which is more then likely will unless your target is waring armor. even 9mm will over penetrate.

DevilMan
06-11-2009, 07:10 PM
Guns R Bad mmmmkay....

Loguzzzzzz
06-11-2009, 08:18 PM
Guns R Bad mmmmkay....
Guns are not bad. . . People are bad! ;)

DevilMan
06-12-2009, 01:17 PM
Guns are not bad. . . People are bad! ;)

And since guns are used by people that makes them bad....

That's why cats, dogs, and ducks are GOOD!!!


Cause they don't use guns....

DM

Loguzzzzzz
06-12-2009, 01:44 PM
And since guns are used by people that makes them bad....
DM

Does this mean that spoons are bad too since people use those as well?

For that matter, since people, dogs cats and ducks use water, doesn't that make dogs,cats and ducks bad?