PDA

View Full Version : What prevents a cocker bolt from getting blown back?



nicad
06-05-2002, 03:08 PM
As the subject states, what exactly prevents an autococker bolt from being blown back while firing a ball? Im focusing this to the setups which claim to operate at like 35psi recocking or thereabouts. this is only about 1 or 2 lbs of force at the shaft -> holding bolt.. very light cocking force.
I have tried placeing an air ram at this same pressure directly behind a bolt tip and firing, but the bolt will get blown back by the propelling air.. unless i crank the ram pressure way up.. well beyond chopping point.
About the only thing i have decided holding the bolt in place is sticktion, mass, and slight binding (bolt -> backblock -> recocking arm). By the same token, how do shockers manage, since they are line-drive behind the bolt with an air ram..? all sticktion??
And i guess a follow up question is how much pressure pushing back typically does the bolt see (cocker, shocker) when firing?

FutureMagOwner
06-05-2002, 03:34 PM
the reason why cockers have no blow back normally(they shouldnt unless if you screwed with the pumping arm) is because it is a closed bolt which means the breach you fire from is sealed so when you shoot all the gas gos down the barrel and then the gun uses the ram to push the back block back which recocks the gun and aloows another ball to feed in. then the ram(via 3-way) pushes the ram back(not sure how but i had a theroy on that) sealing the breech for firing again.

FreshmanBob
06-05-2002, 03:38 PM
The pressure in the ram holds the bolt back in a normal cocker
pressure on the bolt? my guess is less than 70 psi, because thats about what is put onto the paintball.

If you really want to make a LP recocking cocker, find out about the old sheridan guns that used to have a thing on the back that made it so the same wouldnt happen if you didnt hold the pump forward, but would when you pumped it.

lemmie see if i can describe it..
basically the pump arm was connected to a second peice at the back of the bolt. When it was pumped back, the second peice went back and drew out two ball bearings holding in the bolt and then recocked. When pumped forward the ball bearings came out again.

This made it so you could put immense pressure on the bolt and it wouldnt budge, but just tap the pump arm back and it would open up the ball bearings.

Hope that helps

nicad
06-05-2002, 04:24 PM
:) thanks for the input guys, but FutureMagOwner your a little, er, waaay off in another ballgame from what im talking about. :)
I guess i wasnt all too clear... :-/
FreshmanBob- i think your getting my drift. and yes i understand your description of the two locking balls.. makes sence!
Now, how does a cocker/shocker get away with not "locking" the bolt in place while firing? i can see how the higher (80-90psi) recocking setups could possibly supply enough pressure, but they will chop also if they catch a ball.
Im just wondering how the 2-3 LBs of force on a "low-cycle-pressure" setup cocker VS. the ~25 LBs of force the bolt sees (~70psi * area of .68" bolt).. seems like the bolt would physically get blown back with each shot.. but it doesnt.

simply put, we have a small boar ram holding forward at low pressure VS. a large boar (.68") bolt getting a burst back with high pressure.. yet it does not move. why? :)

SLICEnDICE
06-05-2002, 05:24 PM
WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT IS THE OLD COOPER-T BOLTS.

Minimag4me
06-05-2002, 06:06 PM
its because paintballs are a tiny fraction of the weight and friction of the bolt and back block. If the air takes the path of the least resistance, the ball is out of the gun and the bolt sees almost no force.

nicad
06-05-2002, 07:01 PM
.. try turning your LPR off, pull your bolt pin out, and fire.. just make sure noone is standing behind ya.. :-)

xatle
06-05-2002, 07:15 PM
i see what your saying nicad, good question, kinda curious to see a good answer that takes into account equal and opposite reaction and all that jazz.

could someone with a cocker disconnect the cocking rod and fire it and tell us how far the bolt blows back? its a place to start if nobody already has a good answer.

nicad
06-05-2002, 10:55 PM
yeah.. just make sure your backblock isnt throwin the bolt out. thats why i said to turn the LPR off, so the backblock dosnt move.
Iv seen it happen before.. a guy was at the chrono range and his pin fell out and the next shot the bolt went flying back and almost hit a kid behind him.. twas kinda funny... :)

so anyways back to the question. :-p

FreshmanBob
06-06-2002, 06:33 AM
yes, thats what they're called!

cooper-t bolts had that feature, you should check them out and i'm glad you understand what i mean

FutureMagOwner
06-06-2002, 02:08 PM
your questions needed some puncuation and a little grammer check to tell exactly what you wanted so i could answer only what i saw that looked like a question

nicad
06-06-2002, 02:11 PM
LOL.. :) too lazy..
more important things to do.. like eat!

AGD
06-07-2002, 01:18 AM
Nicad,

Are you the old Nicad member? Anyway, you are perceptive in discovering there is not much holding the bolt in place when fired using a low pressure LPR. I suspect that it is moving backward when firing but since your trigger pull almost instantly actuates the 3 way it all seems like one movement.

If you find that the bolt does move back from the air pressure but does not cause blowback up the feed tube there is an explanation. The air blast to the ball is almost instantaneous and is gone in only a few milliseconds. By the time the bolt moves back and opens the breach the pressure is all gone. Think of the air blast like a cue ball hitting another ball. The ball being hit reacts but the cue ball bounces off and is long gone before the ball getting hit moves very far. Got it?

AGD

Vegeta
06-07-2002, 11:25 AM
Tom, you said that the air is out ot the bolt withing a few miliseconds... would this volume of air travelling down the barrel have some sort of downforce vacuum effect on the balls in the chamber as the bolt was opening? i.e. ball suck? or would the air be too far down the barrel to cuase any effects on hte feed tube? Kind of like an airbrush efeect; high pressure air moving over a tube that goes into a canister of paint pulls hte paint up and sprays it out.

I know the issue has been discussed before but I never head of a conclusion.

xatle
06-07-2002, 04:52 PM
ok, i think the air pressure in the ram manages to hold the bolt in place in the same way that i can drive around in a 700 lbs car on 4 tires with 30 psi in them...this doesnt mean i understand or can explain how this works, just that they prolly have a whole lot in common.

nicad
06-08-2002, 05:45 PM
Tom- old member here on AO? very possibly.. been aound for quite some time.. I think I used to have an account on here long ago as well. dont remember for sure. :)
so what your saying the answer might be is that the mass of the bolt takes too long to react to the burst of air (inertia wins!).. ? so that if i were to have a bolt (and backblock) that weighed close to nothing, it would prolly get blown back on each shot.

Vegeta- yes the momentum(spl?) of air traveling down the barrel does create a vaccume.. and if the bolt is opened at the right time, will actually suck the next ball in. kinda like how a 2-stroke engine's tuned exhaust system works.. on resonance(spl?).

xatle- sorry buddy.. one has nothing to do with the other. :) for one, id like to see your 700 lb car. :) lets say an average car weighs 2800lbs.. if your tires have 30psi in them, thats 30lbs of pressure per square inch. lets say each tire is 6" wide and its footprint on the ground is like 4" long. thats 4*6 = 26 square inch footprint. 24*30psi = 720lbs for each tire. 720*4 tires = 2880lbs, and thus your car dosent fall to the ground. :) now make sence?

thanks for the thoughts yall.. but for some reason im still not 100% satisfied.. something still dosent quite add up. im gunna have to do some testing pretty soon to ease my mind. :)

nippinout
06-08-2002, 07:07 PM
Once the hammer is released, it slams into the valve.

This gas goes out the bolt normally. You are questioning how the bolt doesn't move when this occurs.

When the air is being expelled, the bolt does want to move but it cannot. Why ask? If the bolt wanted to move back, it would now need to push the hammer back also (due to the back block).

From my understanding of the cocker, that is why it will not move back when such a low cocking pressure is used.

I hope this helps!

Vegeta
06-08-2002, 09:10 PM
OK so we know hte cocker can be timed to cuase ball suck. That is a really good thing, if you achive it. But can this be applied to other guns? Lets take to mag. Lets say we tune it to where the air is released when hte bolt reaches it's apex, in the barrel. Then we would need to spring to push the bolt back fast enough to where the resonace of the air in hte barrel creates a vaccum leaving e barrel, cuasing ball suck. Now the question is- can we have a spring that is powerful enough to throw the bolt back fast enough to achive this yet still be weak enough to allow for the bolt to seal the barrel and travel fully forwards? We can't have our spring be stronger than the pressure of the air behind the bolt now can we? This is where the mag is a bit limited. But what happens if we replace the spring with something else? Possibly a ram to push the bolt backwards. This could push the bolt back faster than the spring could right? I say what we should do is have almost constant pressure on this ram, with some sort of reg that, when the ram is pushed against (when hte bolt is moved forward by hte air) it opens, allowing the ram to move back, but then immediately springs back sending a surge of pressure to the ram, springing it forward, like a spring would. Now, when the bolt is moved forward by hte air pushing against the bolt, the ram gives a little, but as the air is released, and hte barrel is sealed, the ram surges backwards into it's position, pushing the bolt back into it's cocked position. Weather this would cuase a vacuum or not I cannot tell. Would it wold allow for some neat tinkering.


Did you all understand that? Or should I illustrate?
Tom any comments?

nicad
06-10-2002, 04:01 PM
nippinout- VERY good theory.. and I thought it did that for a good while.. but, well, not all cockers are setup the same, and i dont belive any of them that iv seen (quite a few! :) ) allow the hammer recocking knob to come within touching distance to the backblock. most will have anywhere from 1/4" - 1/2".. some even more, some even less, gap. easy way to tell is to degass the marker, push the hammer all the way in compressing and bottoming out the valve, and see how much gap is left to the backblock.. it still has some good room to move back.. atleast enough to unseal the breach and/or cutoff the flow of air up through the bold from the hole in the body.

So far I like Tom's suggestion the best, but still not 100% satisfied. easy way to prove/disprove his idea is to disconnect the 4-way timing rod (need to keep pressure on the LP system), and lightly set your finger on the backblock. ill bet it does not move at all when firing out a ball. :)

out!

314159
06-21-2002, 02:11 PM
one of my guns is a pgp with a palmer bolt (no bearings to hold the bolt in place when you fire it). when i do not hold the pump arm, the bolt and pump arm will blow back, bounce of the force of the hammer spring, and come most of the way closed. this points out that there is more than just the weight of the bolt kepping it closed.

measured over a chronograph, firing the pgp holding the pump arm forward, and not holding the pump arm yeld almost the same velocity, signifing that the gas pushing the ball, does it's work fast, and is most of the way done before the ball is out of the barrel.

let's say that you are operating your front pneumatics on your autococker at 30psi. if you were to cycle the backblock manualy, with out moving the 4 way valve to vent the gass in the ram, you will need to compress the gass in the back block to move it back, thus the foce needed to move the back block back is not a linear relationship.

out of all the bolts i have seen for the autococker, most of the bolt tips hang past the feed tube for about an eight of an inch.

to make an autococker misfunction, the back block would have to be pushed back more than 1/8 th of an inch, while the gas burst firing the paintball is going on.

the force pushing back on the bolt should be equal to the force on the paintball which i have heard is just under 3 joules (havent calculated myself). from the pgp example above, the time that this is acting on should be around the time it takes a paintball to leave the barrel.

this force is not great enough to move the bolt, backblock, pump arm, and ram pistion, against the pressure in the ram more than 1/8th of an inch in a couple milliseconds.

the electrician
07-02-2002, 07:42 PM
there it is. that sums it up pretty good.
I've noticed that straight thru, single tube design pump guns are more apt to push the bolt back than the stack tube guns. I wonder if the air making a 90 degree turn helps in the matter at all.seems like it would also have an affect but I'm not for certain.

314159
07-03-2002, 12:36 PM
just a hunch, as far as the stacked tube pumps go(with the exception of most PGPs). maby the air flowing through the hole in the bottom of the bolt in effect helps hold it in place.

it seems to me that if the hole in the bolt was not lined up perfectly over the hole in the body where the gas vents out. so if the bolt moved back a little, maby the gas going through the hold in the body, would hit the area right in front of the hole, (even more so if it was tapered) and would push this forward.

tat2dhillbilly
07-05-2002, 01:13 PM
The bolt does not move because what little force acts on it is not enough to overcome the pressure on the ram holding the bolt forward. As you pull the trigger you cycle the four way to move the bolt back and then forward to load a ball. The pneumatics are not vented until you release the trigger fully. This will keep the bolt pneumatics a closed system and the blowback forces on the bolt face which are minimal at best due to the fact that the bolt is hollow and the forces can only act on the lip around the face of the bolt.

Path of least resistance and all that too..........

nerobro
07-05-2002, 04:34 PM
though the thread was dead a long time ago...


You're incorrect in your asertion that the outer edge of the bolt is all that revieves force. The entire aera of the bolt recieves force. The shape of a surface does not change the force applied when it comes to gasses.

On snipers, the bolt is blown back signifigantly unless you hold it forward. If your'e looking for proof that the force is there.

314159's suggestion that there might be uneven force on the bolt from the air coming from below has some weight. In spyder type blowbacks there is a long standing issue with wear on the top of the bolt, something is shoving it into the top of the gun. That could provide some locking force on the bolt.

As far as I can tell, the ram is what keeps the bolt shut. Becasue there is pressurized air in the ram and a relitively small outlet, it will provide some signifigant dampening force to the bolt movement.

Killaman
07-17-2002, 09:26 PM
NO..... a cocker isnt blown back because you need the RAM's power to blow it back and evenw hen u cock it back manually u need about and extra 5 lbs of pull to let a PB in the chamber