PDA

View Full Version : Name the Markers in this Pic.


TNS2k2
12-20-2002, 12:53 AM
Okay...well i can see that from the Right to Left there is..
-Impulse
-Angel
-Emag?
-SFL/Xmag?

The last 2 i am unsure of.

http://www.automags.org/~TomAGD/heightcompared.jpg
Quiet
12-20-2002, 01:09 AM
Second last could just be an RT. Last one has a changable breach but no X-valve so its an SFL or extreme.
Gitaroo Man
12-20-2002, 01:12 AM
yeah, impulse angel emag/rt sfl
pbzmag
12-20-2002, 01:18 AM
Second to left is a Highrise RT, old-school valve.

pbzmag
blnk162
12-20-2002, 01:50 AM
who cares?
dansim
12-20-2002, 08:07 AM
sfl, emag, angel, impy
Schnitzel
12-20-2002, 10:36 AM
tom should take a new pic with the no-rise in there, just for comparison.
Brak
12-20-2002, 07:51 PM
emag, RT pro, angel, impulse

from left to right
toymyster
12-20-2002, 08:21 PM
Like Pbz said, it is an old school RT!! Of course, RT, RT Pro, and E-mag all have the same profile, hightwise!!
Brak
12-20-2002, 08:27 PM
i dont think its an old school RT. old school rt's body rail is a bit thicker and extends a bit more around the body
Schnitzel
12-21-2002, 03:03 AM
plus the fact that high-rise's weren't around on mags during old school RT manufacture.
toymyster
12-21-2002, 04:03 AM
You guys are absolutely correct!! I stand corrected, that is indeed an e-mag or RT Pro!! It's probably an E-mag, judging by the company it's in!!
Brak
12-21-2002, 10:06 AM
i still think its an RT pro, because most emags dont have the big heavy sight rail on the top, and RT pros do. (note the emag sight rail on the left of it, then look at the sight rail that it has)
BajaBoy
12-21-2002, 10:49 AM
its an emag, the rtp does not have a tapered rail where the valve is. This one does. And the emag had the soild site rail. the rtp was almost sheat metal
ah137
12-21-2002, 04:07 PM
Ok this is getting silly. I have seen this E-MAG Twice in person.

-One it has a thick site rail--E-mag
-Two this is an emag with a solar system/galaxy painted on it. Look and you can see an asteroids tail. I have a pic of it but it’s not digital.

Hills
WARPED1
12-21-2002, 04:18 PM
Left to right:EMag,SFL,Angel,Shocker?
Dubstar112
12-21-2002, 04:34 PM
sfl(extreme has more site rail), emag(vert feed), angel, impulse. the last one is definatley an impulse.
WARPED1
12-21-2002, 05:47 PM
Duh,yeah Imp.I didn't see the bolt knob/"cocking" knob.My bad eyes.
ezrunner
12-21-2002, 09:51 PM
Question?

If the second from left is an emag, where is the air fitting?

I vote it is an older RT with the newer body. That explains
the lack of an air fitting on the side of the valve since it
takes air through the rail.

I don't know that the emags were ever built this way. Correct me
if I'm wrong, I'm sure they will :-)

-rob
BlackVCG
12-21-2002, 10:17 PM
Fittings are removable.

It's an E-Mag. 100%
pbzmag
12-21-2002, 10:33 PM
Originally posted by ah137
Ok this is getting silly. I have seen this E-MAG Twice in person.

-One it has a thick site rail--E-mag
-Two this is an emag with a solar system/galaxy painted on it. Look and you can see an asteroids tail. I have a pic of it but it’s not digital.

Hills

I just took a second look and I remeber seeing the solar system/galaxy emag. A picture or a link is floating around on the forum. One reason I said it was an old school RT was that there was no elbow on the valve leading me to believe to that. Good eye ah137.
Mr. T!
12-22-2002, 03:08 AM
Damn, imps are REALLY tall.
Schnitzel
12-22-2002, 03:14 AM
i just thought it was funny that some thought 3rd from right was a classic RT valve.

if you knw anything about classic RT's, you'd know that the OD of all AGD markers' bodies hasnt changed at all. that would mean that the valve is a smaller OD than an RTP, so that means if it were a classic RT, the newer body would have to extend the length of the valve. so then it would have to be a custom body, as a one-time thing. knowing Tom, i know he wouldn't spend the extra time and money "just to see how it looks", or just to display it.:)
ezrunner
12-22-2002, 12:36 PM
Would someone put his snide remarks into english?

I suspect this picture was taken when Tom was demonstrating that
even with a highrise the emag was no taller than an Angel.

If I remember, some of the older RT's had stamped metal sight rails
that one is obviously aluminum. As far as fittings, since there
is not an air fitting on the marker in question, that led me
to think it could be an RT.

Voicing opinions and educated guesses is one thing. If you
want to flame or be an ***, please go to one of the other
online forums, there are plenty where that is the prevailing
attitude.

-rob
Muzikman
12-22-2002, 02:38 PM
That is not an Emag..it is an RT Pro...it usually sits on the shelf outside of Toms office. I have pics of it some place...
magman007
12-22-2002, 10:08 PM
Jason, remember back to the 2001 Iao. Tom explained how that marker came to be. I think manike had alot to do with it. the barrel has since ben canibalized, and used in the teflon ball tester



the marker is truely chromed in the trigger frame and rail etc


Altho, i remember it as an e-mag... i am not quite sure, tom switches stuff up some times.



im pretty damn sure it is an e-mag
Muzikman
12-23-2002, 12:13 AM
The two or three times I have seen that gun it was sitting on the shelf in the AGD office. I am pretty sure it was an RT Pro. Wish Tom would step in here;)
Blazestorm
12-23-2002, 05:32 AM
SFL Emag - Emag - Angel - Impulse

:D
Dubstar112
12-23-2002, 11:13 AM
gah, look at the color of the frame on the emag/rt(pro or not i dont care.). Its nickle plated! which means that its more than likeley an rt with intelliframe. THe site rail issue, its not hard to screw an emag site rail on an rt pro, or if it was an old school rt they came with those site rails.