No Rise vs. Warp

[RTMAGBOY13]

alright i need some answers about the No Rise w/halo b and the Warp i already did a "SEARCH" and couldnt find ne thing so im askin for some help on which one i should choose between? and a good reason why

thanks :)

[digitard]

They both rock ...

I have a WARP and Halo B and its VERY VERY quick.

THE main thing w/ the warp is the low profile ... you dont have the hopper on top. If your a player that you want to be able to just "peek" out and get shots off or do a lot of snap shots the warp rocks.... or if you get a lot of hopper shots.

**Edit** The other thing to factor in ... is have you actually used a Warp? Some people love the idea, but use it and hate it ... some people swear by them (like me).... I suggest testing it.

Sincerely
Dave

[hitech]

Originally posted by digitard
THE main thing w/ the warp is the low profile...

That is the main point. It does feed very fast, but you can get fast feeding without it. You can't get the lowered profile without it.

[Mr. Emag Man]

the low rise

i have used both warp and lowrise

i like both but prefer the lowrise

and with the halo b they shoot just the same

the thing i see with the warp is you can only shoot with you one hand

you can shoot out both sides of a bunker but i find it a bit ocward

with the low rise you can switch hands

i found this to better fit my style of play

its just what you want and how you play

oh i switch off

low rise for tourney

warp for senario

they really run from the speed

its what you want and your style of play

think about it

also try one before you buy and see you you really want it

the warp can make gun a bit heavy and ocward to shoot

thanks

any questions

please pm me

will

[Sniper]

Can anyone submit a pic of each?

[digitard]

Give me 10mins ... I'll post a pic of my Emag w/ WARP left body and warp

Sincerely,
Dave K

[digitard]

Here are 2 pics, pardon the horrible surroundings (aka my dirty kitchen)



and




Sincerely,
Dave K

[logamus]

santa spiderman is pimp.

[NiteWolf1138]

Personally I like the warp. It naturallly fits into how I peek around each side of a bunker. It works for me really well. I'd say try it, then go with what YOU like.

This is why we need a lot of AO get-togethers. We get to see and usually try(thanx Daroach) other player rigs.

[jayloo]

If you go here you can see several pics of my emag - warp setup from a bunch of angles. I have preordered a norise...should be any day. I'll post them when I get the norise.

[�.C.]

depends where you want the weight, I'd do halo B + norise since I'd rather have the wieght on the hopper instead of the tank.

[cledford]

Well - I can answer competently since I've run both ways. First, I am about as much as a Warp-feed supporter as you"ll ever find. I even sold my AKA Viking (without hesitation) because, due to it's design, it did not position the warp in a comfortable enough position to run it on the gun.

That having been said - I (as I voted) am currently running a no-rise/HALO-B setup and am fairly happy with it.

The issue is weight. I really, really wanted to run my Emag as my primary marker once the Viking was gone. I had the choice of 4 (including Emag) markers to run with. First, GZlassic Timmy (Classic with GZ reg housing) which is a extremely light, fast, accurate marker. I also have a "Raced" Cocker - which is just a ton of fun. Finally, I've also got a V-Feed Shocker.

Every marker had it good points and bad - but the unquestionable favorite was the LX-Emag. The problem is that the Timmy, complete with warp is still a lot lighter then the Emag even without. I had a tough decision because I really, really like supporting AGD at the field and love to show the world what the LX-E can do. The weigh issue with the warp was a tough pill to swallow though - it was just too much.

What I've done in the interim is purchase the no-rise which provides much of what I love about the warp - it makes the BALLOON (uh, hopper) harder to hit. A side benefit is that it feeds wickedly fast with the HALOB.

The is a temporary setup on my road to ULE sweetness. (Cant afford a Xmag) I currently have a ULE rail with Tuna being polished. I just installed my ULE frame and will be purchasing a Xvalve soon. I figure the weight savings will let me go back to running the warp - comfortably! That is my real goal. I am also hoping for a ULE/aluminum body to cut the weight further.

My real goal is to get back to the Warp - the advantage it provides is just indescribable. The no-rise is a good stepping stone and is a decent compromise between hopper and warp.

In either body case (ULE or no-rise) I will run the warp - as opposed to the "warp body." I used to run like that, I but sight down the left side of the marker, and that hose can be a distraction, whereas with the vertfeed a decent "low-rise" warp adapter keeps everything compact, yet feeds into the top keeping stuff (feeds, hoses) off of the side of the gun.

-Calvin

[Russ]

I have used both, and Cledford, digtard, hitech, & Mr Emag Man have already given excellent answers to the differences...

But, for me, I prefer a hopper sitting on top of the mainbody. It allows me to easily shoot with either hand, balances the gun better, and cuts down on overall weight (1+ lbs) Also, with the addition of any item, there is just more to go wrong. Different paints can reek havoc with a warp feed. Batteries are an issue as well. And if you take a hit on a full feed hose...wel, that's a nasty mess when a ball breaks inside it!

I had 2 warps, on two different guns. I like the hopper on top. I now run a halo "B", soon to sit on a milled sluggo

YMMV