Democrats Threaten To Pack Supreme Court

[Tunaman]

What the hell is wrong with you?

I don't agree with most of what you've said in this thread or the other one about defunding the police, but I would never makes jokes about killing you. I don't even know how to respond to that.

You know what? I'm out. I'm not arguing with people who are so disrespectful. You too, Going-Home. I still remember your rooftop voting comment. I shouldn't have let it slide then. I'm not standing for it any more.

If it were up to me you'd both be banned for a while. Disagreements and arguments are one thing. But you've crossed the line.

They say if you look up and scream at the sky it helps.

[stonersr26]

That might be true, but showing those experts that DO know, to show if there is either legal or illegal acts, can only do one thing. Answer all these questions. Show the taxes, end the debate about it.

[Nobody]

That might be true, but showing those experts that DO know, to show if there is either legal or illegal acts, can only do one thing. Answer all these questions. Show the taxes, end the debate about it.

[stonersr26]

Even worse...I am shocked at the number of people who don’t think police need to know the majority of laws to do their jobs.

You ever been a POPO? I have and I can tell you that keeping up to date with all the bull**** that changes on a daily basis is ridiculous. Are some cops better than others? Yes, and some are absolutely horrible, but so are lawyers, and politicians, and doctors, and civilians and on and on and on.

Not making excuses, rather pointing out it is a bigger part of a designed system to create a quagmire of problems.

[wetwrks]

The fact that so many “supposed adults” don’t know anything about tax law and the difference between income taxes and capitol gains taxes is sad and pathetic.

Even worse...I am shocked at the number of people who don’t think police need to know the majority of laws to do their jobs.

[stonersr26]

The fact that so many “supposed adults” don’t know anything about tax law and the difference between income taxes and capitol gains taxes is sad and pathetic.

[luke]

Beep Beep :rofl:

[luke]

Your communist attitude is astounding.

If it were up to me you'd both be banned for a while.

[luke]

There it is again.. :rofl:

What the hell is wrong with you?

I don't agree with most of what you've said in this thread or the other one about defunding the police, but I would never makes jokes about killing you. I don't even know how to respond to that.

You know what? I'm out. I'm not arguing with people who are so disrespectful. You too, Going-Home. I still remember your rooftop voting comment. I shouldn't have let it slide then. I'm not standing for it any more.

If it were up to me you'd both be banned for a while. Disagreements and arguments are one thing. But you've crossed the line.

[rawbutter]

I never said that...

Dude, I'm sorry. Seriously. You're right. I went back and double-checked, and it was wetwrks, not you.

Okay... Now I'm really out. See you all later.

[Nobody]

If CNBC doesn't question it then he is pretty likely doing as he said he would.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/03/trum...ronavirus.html

USAToday as well

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/07/11/fact-check-donald-trump-donates-salary-but-he-still-makes-money/5410134002/

Moreover if he weren't then people from those departments would be all over the news calling him out on it.

Ok, i guess i am wrong about it. The proof is in the pudding, as it were.

[wetwrks]

He might have donated his salary, but because of his obfuscation of any truth, or the paperwork of the donation, i highly doubt that. An answer that can be easily solved with release of Trump's taxes

If CNBC doesn't question it then he is pretty likely doing as he said he would.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/03/trum...ronavirus.html

USAToday as well

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/07/11/fact-check-donald-trump-donates-salary-but-he-still-makes-money/5410134002/

Moreover if he weren't then people from those departments would be all over the news calling him out on it.

[going_home]

What the hell is wrong with you?

I don't agree with most of what you've said in this thread or the other one about defunding the police, but I would never makes jokes about killing you. I don't even know how to respond to that.

You know what? I'm out. I'm not arguing with people who are so disrespectful.So wait, this is about respect now all of a sudden ? You too, Going-Home. I still remember your rooftop voting comment. Your memory is failing you, I never said that. I shouldn't have let it slide then. I'm not standing for it any more.

If it were up to me you'd both be banned for a while. Disagreements and arguments are one thing. But you've crossed the line.

Good luck.

[Nobody]

If the Democrats come back into power and pack the court, it will come back to bite them in the ass, just like the Nuclear Option did. When President Obama nominated Garland Merrick his party did not hold the Senate, so his nomination went nowhere. Had the Democrats held the Senate at that time Merrick would be sitting on the supreme court. This time around the Republican party holds the White House and the Senate so they can do what they want when it comes to nominations. It is a check and balance thing.

Considering President Trump has donated his complete presidential salary to the US Government, he certainly has paid more than $750.

While true that 2016, the dems didn't hold the senate, yet that wasn't what the senate chose to oppose the nomination. They had said, and has been thoroughly sited, and repeated, that in an Election year, that it would be unfair to the people, to not have a say in who is the next person able to nominate a court judge. Now, it is true that the WH and senate are in Republican hands, giving them the advantage to push it through. It is only fair to hold the same rules for one side to the other. Because if the dems had the senate & Trump won in 2016, wouldn't he & then the Republican party then threaten or even push to pack the court?

Checks & balances should go both ways.

He might have donated his salary, but because of his obfuscation of any truth, or the paperwork of the donation, i highly doubt that. An answer that can be easily solved with release of Trump's taxes

[Nobody]

You guys realize you aren't changing anyone's mind with the America hating idiocy you learned from your marxist college professors ?

Pump the brakes pump the brakes ...

That is assuming that you or any of the other hardliners could have their minds changed. I honestly, am not in this TO CHANGE anyone's mind, i am just bringing up the other side in a fair balance. This is a paintball site, not any one political website. It is unfair to everyone to only have 1 view point, so i take it upon myself to help represent an opposing view. If i change anyone's mind, for one or the other, so be it. I just have ethics, morals, decorum, intelligence, integrity; so i have no clue why anyone would want to support the buffoon in charge, or how anyone could sell their soul to support the man in office that is literally bringing down my country.

And a marxist professor would have a totally different set of ethics than anyone here is displaying. Please look up these terms, cause you toss around socialist, communist & fascist, and you have no clue as to what they mean, only that foxnews et al, use them.