Question to Tom Kaye

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fantom
    Registered User
    • Jul 2007
    • 63

    #1

    Question to Tom Kaye

    Tom,

    I was thinking that by doubling the volume of the chamber of the classic valve I would be able to half the operation pressure, but before I start making holes in my valve to add an extra volume chamber I would like to know if you have done it and if you achieved any improvement in noise reduction without ruining the consistency of the valve. I'm aware that I would have to deal with a softer spring also.

    I add that I don't mind a slower recharge cycle as I shoot very slowly.

    Thanks,

    Fantom
  • Muzikman
    Everything AGD
    • Dec 2000
    • 6229

    #2
    I really doubt you would be able to double the size of the chamber unless you tried something like the old SP Magic Box, which didn't work as advertized back then, so I doubt it will work for you now.

    Oh, and your math is off. Pressure vs volume is not 1:1

    Comment

    • mostpeople
      Registered User
      • Mar 2007
      • 1680

      #3
      PV=nRT

      Comment

      • Fantom
        Registered User
        • Jul 2007
        • 63

        #4
        Originally posted by Muzikman
        I really doubt you would be able to double the size of the chamber unless you tried something like the old SP Magic Box, which didn't work as advertized back then, so I doubt it will work for you now.

        Oh, and your math is off. Pressure vs volume is not 1:1
        PV = P'V'

        Comment

        • ThePixelGuru
          Guru of Pixels
          • May 2005
          • 1461

          #5
          If it did anything good, they would have done it on all Automags.
          They didn't do it on all 'mags.
          It doesn't do anything good.

          LP is a pile of male cow poo.

          Comment

          • Fantom
            Registered User
            • Jul 2007
            • 63

            #6
            up

            Comment

            • MANN
              I am in TN. GO VOLS.
              • Apr 2006
              • 4266

              #7
              Originally posted by Fantom
              up
              You dont need to up this question. If it needed to be bigger it would have been. Drill a hole, and try it for yourself. You will find it doesnt help.

              Comment

              • Tracker
                some dude at random
                • May 2003
                • 279

                #8
                actually all youll be doing is hurting your efficency

                the magic box lowered the efficiency by about 10%, as did the smart valve, but by RAISING the operating pressure, as some people have done by restricting some of the chamber, they were actually able to gain about a 10% increase over stock

                Tracker

                WOW thats a really nice marker.... FOR ME TO POOP ON!!!!

                i own XT00205
                and FL10239
                and a few others

                Comment

                • Fantom
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 63

                  #9
                  Thanks guys.

                  My objective is to reduce noise without impacting consistency.

                  Efficiency or recharge time are not issues.

                  Also, to do this I have to approach it as research.....first I have to find out if it has been done and what were the results (nice if I can see the numbers). If it has not been done, then I will do it and find out quatitatively the extent of change.

                  So, if any of you can tell me if it has been done and if there was a reduction in dB please come forward.

                  Note: The other day at the field, I was at the chrony and one kid showed me his brand new super expensive marker and I was amazed how quiet it was. That got me thinking that if I could lower the pressure of at least one of my AGD markers down to 200 psi, it would probably be as quite as an old Autococker I have.

                  The mod doesn't seem difficult....just tap the chamber and connect it to a cylinder, equivalent in volume, adjust the pressure down to approx 200 psi, adjust/change/make a new spring and make measurements. Of all this, I think the spring is going to be the most difficult part of the project.

                  Comment

                  • ThePixelGuru
                    Guru of Pixels
                    • May 2005
                    • 1461

                    #10
                    I'm gonna bet your barrel has far more of an effect on your marker's sound than anything else.

                    Comment

                    • Fantom
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 63

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ThePixelGuru
                      I'm gonna bet your barrel has far more of an effect on your marker's sound than anything else.
                      That is true.

                      Comment

                      • athomas
                        Of course it works-its AGD
                        • Jan 2002
                        • 8039

                        #12
                        The way the mag works, doubling the air chamber won't cut the operating pressure in half. The Inside diameter of the powertube and the stem of bolt would also need to be adjusted. You could reduce the force of the bolt spring to compensate, but then you slow down the return of the bolt, even if you could maintain forward bolt speed. The bolt acts like a restrictor. That necessitates a higher operating pressure to maintain any kind of efficiency. The higher the operating pressure, the better the efficiency gets. And of course, the lower the pressure gets, the worst the efficiency gets as a greater amount of the pressure is required just to keep the bolt forward to allow the air to escape.
                        Except for the Automag in front, its usually the man behind the equipment that counts.

                        Comment

                        • MANN
                          I am in TN. GO VOLS.
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 4266

                          #13
                          If you are planning on increasing the air chamber you will want to tap the front of the valve (1/8npt). like this:



                          And iirc the volume did allow a lower operating pressure. It was not half, but somewhere around 400iirc. if you want this one pm me, and we can try to work something out

                          Comment

                          • Fantom
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2007
                            • 63

                            #14
                            Originally posted by MANN
                            If you are planning on increasing the air chamber you will want to tap the front of the valve (1/8npt). like this:

                            And iirc the volume did allow a lower operating pressure. It was not half, but somewhere around 400iirc. if you want this one pm me, and we can try to work something out
                            Exactly what I was thinking.

                            PM'd

                            Comment

                            Working...