Accuracy question....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • diablo779
    Paintball junkie
    • Aug 2007
    • 6

    #1

    Accuracy question....

    Tonight I sighted in my red dot sight, more or less, but i still get a bit of strays. Most of them land in a pretty decent and tight group, but a quarter to a third of them fall within a circle about 3x the size. Any suggestions as to why this may be?

    Thanks



    68 Automag
    X-Valve
    ULE trigger pull kit
    Tac One Warp Right mainbody
    Q-Loader
    18" all aluminum Dye Boomstick
    Holographic Red Dot sight
    and of course, compressed air

    Paintballs used today were RPS Premium, but I normally try to use Marballizers when I'm able to.
  • runningboar
    Registered User
    • Mar 2008
    • 30

    #2
    Originally posted by diablo779
    Tonight I sighted in my red dot sight, more or less, but i still get a bit of strays. Most of them land in a pretty decent and tight group, but a quarter to a third of them fall within a circle about 3x the size. Any suggestions as to why this may be?

    Wind, flat spots or dimples in the paint, variations in diameter of the paint, where the paintball was sitting in the breach when it was fired or any number of other things that I didn't mention.

    Painball guns are not tackdrivers, regardless of what manufacturers claim. Some days the planets line up, the humidity is just right and the paint is fresh and you are able to shoot BBs, most days that is not the case. My experience is a sight on a paintball gun is just a reference point and once you have shot enough paint through your gun you can be just as accurate with kentucky windage. Chris

    Comment

    • Ando
      Magusmaximus
      • Jun 2009
      • 4144

      #3
      Originally posted by runningboar

      Painball guns are not tackdrivers, regardless of what manufacturers claim. Some days the planets line up, the humidity is just right and the paint is fresh and you are able to shoot BBs, most days that is not the case. My experience is a sight on a paintball gun is just a reference point and once you have shot enough paint through your gun you can be just as accurate with kentucky windage. Chris
      I approve this message.
      My Feedback

      Comment

      • mark cody
        Registered User
        • Sep 2008
        • 135

        #4
        Sights on paintball guns are useless you walk paintballs on target.To many varying factors for accurate paintball flight.

        Comment

        • Boltaction
          The Dark Side
          • Oct 2002
          • 179

          #5
          what runningboar said.

          Comment

          • Shirow
            www.digitalgunfire.com
            • Aug 2002
            • 2023

            #6
            Originally posted by diablo779
            Any suggestions as to why this may be?
            You are shooting a paintball gun.
            Superbolt

            Comment

            • sjrtk
              Clown under the bed
              • May 2009
              • 828

              #7
              Copy and paste above responses. The only marker i have a sight on is my Pro-Carbine (it looks cool) i use it as a reference for ranging a target. The battery died years ago and I never replaced it, works better with out it anyway.

              Comment

              • diablo779
                Paintball junkie
                • Aug 2007
                • 6

                #8
                Originally posted by runningboar
                Painball guns are not tackdrivers, regardless of what manufacturers claim.
                I do understand this, I just figured the variances would be somewhat consistent, as opposed to 6 or 8 in a row almost on top of each other, and then 3 or 4 way off in all different directions. The paint is brand new, so I doubt it's had a chance to dimple yet, but maybe there's some size variances. I do use the red dot as a guide, and half the time I just sight down the barrel, especially for quick shots.

                Does anyone have any opinions about the Evil Pipe system? I've thought about trying it for a while.

                Thanks for all the input

                Comment

                • Drix
                  New Hampshire Indoor PB
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 552

                  #9
                  Having used barrel systems for a while now, I'm not sure I've ever noticed any sort of accuracy increase with having barrel backs- the only thing I've seen is the ability to manipulate breaks under certain weather conditions and slight efficiency differences. You may want to rethink your approach to a kit as opposed to finding one or two barrels that you like (maybe a .682 and a .689)

                  Comment

                  • runningboar
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 30

                    #10
                    Originally posted by diablo779

                    Does anyone have any opinions about the Evil Pipe system? I've thought about trying it for a while.

                    Thanks for all the input

                    I might have a lot of people disagree but I think the paint is more important than the barrel. I have gotten some really good paint that shot great out of several different barrels and bores, on the other hand, I have never seen even the most expensive barrel compensate for crappy paint. I do have a nice freak system for my autococker, I hate roll outs, but for my mags I have an old J and J that works very well for me. Chris

                    Comment

                    • Loneassassin
                      Registered User
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 186

                      #11
                      Originally posted by runningboar
                      I might have a lot of people disagree but I think the paint is more important than the barrel. I have gotten some really good paint that shot great out of several different barrels and bores, on the other hand, I have never seen even the most expensive barrel compensate for crappy paint. I do have a nice freak system for my autococker, I hate roll outs, but for my mags I have an old J and J that works very well for me. Chris
                      I agree with this. And you can't just buy high-end paint and assume that it will all shoot with the same accuracy. Unless every ball is consistent and dimple free, they won't all shoot accurately. That said, I've been shooting Marbalizers for a long time and for me, they've always been extremely accurate and consistant. I've never seen a mishapen Marbalizer paintball...

                      With paintballs, you get what you pay for. I've actually observed for awhile now that it might indeed be less expensive in the long run to buy more expensive paint. Because with excellent paint I can one-ball people in the hoppers, elbows, and feet all day, whereas low-end paint I have to keep shooting to get eliminations.

                      Comment

                      • Shirow
                        www.digitalgunfire.com
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 2023

                        #12
                        In regards to barrel kits, I've come to the conclusion that they are mostly useless, especially if they have a ton of closely spaced backs.

                        Most people agree, I think, that you are better off over or underboring - specific paint to barrel match seems to be the worst. You also can't assume every ball will be exactly the same size so even if you wanted a perfect paint->barrel match, you're not going to get it.

                        I think if I was going to buy barrels all over again (already have a kit) I'd just get one big bored barrel and one small or just do something like get a Deadlywind barrel and get a large insert with it (689 or 687) and a small Ty brass insert (675) and stop there.

                        I have a J&J edge kit with a 684, 687, 689 and 693 back selection, I mostly use nothing but 687. 684 isn't small enough to really underbore and 687 is big enough to overbore the field paint where I play.

                        I doubt I will ever use the 689 or 693 backs.

                        If you don't really care about efficiency (which, honestly, I really don't at this point.. if the field has free air, who cares?) just get a Lapco Bigshot or whatever barrel you like with a decently large bore and use that.
                        Superbolt

                        Comment

                        • XM15
                          Registered User

                          • Dec 2005
                          • 279

                          #13
                          I agree with everthing posted. Paintball guns are no different than a musket. They shoot a imperfectly round ball down a smooth bore barrel. A ball is not the best shape for a projectile for accuracy and distance. The other problem is trigger control and gun control when firing a paintball gun is pretty close to non exsistant. The gun is jerking and pulling all the time. The balls are slow enough that it is easy to throw fliers off target. Shoot a real firearm the way most guys shoot a paintball gun and the target will look like a shot gun hit it. Its actually amazing paintball guns are as acurate as they are.

                          Comment

                          Working...