There is a new idea surfacing in paintball. It states that, according to physics, the chambering of the ball has no effect on it's trajectory. Which is to say that a "PMI Premium" ball fired out of a "DYE Boomstick" from, for example, a Spyder, will have the exact same trajectory as a "PMI Premium" ball fired out of a "DYE Boomstick" from an Autococker - assuming that both balls leave the barrel at a velocity of 300 feet per second.
This, of course, is a phallacy.
The "physics" approach to paintball trajectory seems to imply that the trajectory of a ball shot from a musket is independant of the packing characteristics of the gun powder behind the musket ball.
For whatever the reasons, be they better regulation of the air pushing the ball, thus making the ball fly on a more consistent trajectory from shot to shot; spin put on the ball from different types of firing methods; or some "magic" element which I can not think of right now, a cocker just fires more accurately than a Tippman. I will not claim to know why, but I do know that it is.
-Kyle-
p.s. - don't hate me!
This, of course, is a phallacy.
The "physics" approach to paintball trajectory seems to imply that the trajectory of a ball shot from a musket is independant of the packing characteristics of the gun powder behind the musket ball.
For whatever the reasons, be they better regulation of the air pushing the ball, thus making the ball fly on a more consistent trajectory from shot to shot; spin put on the ball from different types of firing methods; or some "magic" element which I can not think of right now, a cocker just fires more accurately than a Tippman. I will not claim to know why, but I do know that it is.
-Kyle-
p.s. - don't hate me!


. 

Comment