RT valve

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • athomas
    Of course it works-its AGD
    • Jan 2002
    • 8039

    #16
    Standard AIR valves are good for about 12 shots per second without shoot down. The biggest problem with a standard valve is the possibility of short stroking due to slower recharge rate. With an emag frame, you don't need to worry about short stroking. If you are never going to shoot continuous strings of 14 shots per second, I wouldn't worry about paying $250 - $300 for a new retro valve.
    Except for the Automag in front, its usually the man behind the equipment that counts.

    Comment

    • psifry
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 14

      #17
      thanks all

      Thanks PyRo and AThomas

      I saw an RT valve on Ebay (not sure where the rest of the marker went), but lost it when the other person did the "buy it now" option for $185.00. (I was at $112.00)

      I don't think I'm squeezing off 14 bps when I play (I don't think my fingers can pull even 6), and since we can't fire in any other mode other than 1-ball-per-trigger-pull out here in Calif (at least the field I usually play at) it probably won't matter if I am using the standard or RT mechanism.

      Anyone have pics of their valves? Just curious to see it.

      thanks all

      doug
      mutant EMag

      Comment

      • rikkter
        • Jun 2002
        • 1804

        #18
        up.


        i know about the bps and all, but what are the PHYSICAL changes in the rt and classic valves?
        pictures would be nice..
        viking #619

        Comment

        • athomas
          Of course it works-its AGD
          • Jan 2002
          • 8039

          #19
          Check out the manuals:







          These should show some of the differences in the air passages and construction.
          Except for the Automag in front, its usually the man behind the equipment that counts.

          Comment

          • PyRo
            President Bioloaf inc.
            • Dec 2000
            • 10186

            #20
            Different reg, and differant on-off.

            Comment

            • TransMan
              Man Beast!!!
              • Apr 2002
              • 3152

              #21
              This isn't a flame or anything but would you please stop calling it a RT valve what your looking for is a Retro valve.

              Comment

              • rikkter
                • Jun 2002
                • 1804

                #22
                ok thanks thomas
                Last edited by rikkter; 08-23-2002, 03:53 PM.
                viking #619

                Comment

                Working...