Hi All,
I took a long hard look at what would actually improve my Mag last night based on my style of play, and I can't decide about the retro-valve.
My end goal is not to maximise paint dpm ( dollars per minute ) and I've read that it is the retro valves ability to recharge allowing high rates of fire that many people like.. not relevant for me. I don't like to fire lots of paint.
Can anyone advise if:
- the trigger pull is significantly sweeter ( as in less aggressive and less likely to take my off aim )
- the fps consistency for single shots or strings of 2 or 3 is better than a stock automag valve
If not, then I might be better dumping my money into a hyperframe ( for its action and cool-factor, not its ROF )
TIA
Keith
I took a long hard look at what would actually improve my Mag last night based on my style of play, and I can't decide about the retro-valve.
My end goal is not to maximise paint dpm ( dollars per minute ) and I've read that it is the retro valves ability to recharge allowing high rates of fire that many people like.. not relevant for me. I don't like to fire lots of paint.
Can anyone advise if:
- the trigger pull is significantly sweeter ( as in less aggressive and less likely to take my off aim )
- the fps consistency for single shots or strings of 2 or 3 is better than a stock automag valve
If not, then I might be better dumping my money into a hyperframe ( for its action and cool-factor, not its ROF )
TIA
Keith


Comment