2.4 Vs. 3.2???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VR4SL
    Registered User
    • Oct 2003
    • 90

    #1

    2.4 Vs. 3.2???

    Hmm...

    Now that I have personal experience with 2.4 and 3.2, both of which I have on hand at the moment, I must say, 2.4 seems faster than 3.2. Also, 2.4 will allow me to adjust the trigger on the edge of hysteresis-(basically making the gun shoot rapid bursts only when the trigger is pulled a certain way in E-mode)- while 3.2 will not allow me to do this. Am I missing something? wasnt 3.2 supposed to be better...?
    Black-to-Red Fade Dust CNC X-Mag VV04947
  • afultz075
    Registered User
    • May 2004
    • 779

    #2
    3.2 has shot buffering and 2.4 doesn't, that's the only difference as far as I know

    Comment

    • ryanshep
      I throw paintballs
      • Jan 2004
      • 431

      #3
      3.2 is also ace compatible
      *~* Feedback *~*

      Misc F/s

      Comment

      • VR4SL
        Registered User
        • Oct 2003
        • 90

        #4
        Originally posted by ryanshep
        3.2 is also ace compatible
        So is the X-Mag version of 2.4
        Black-to-Red Fade Dust CNC X-Mag VV04947

        Comment

        • afultz075
          Registered User
          • May 2004
          • 779

          #5
          Yea, when my e-mag had 2.4 it had ACE compatibilty as well.

          Comment

          • Sniper king
            And boom goes the dynamite
            • Aug 2003
            • 3322

            #6
            ummmmm 3.2 is newer
            Euro E-mag | TL63 | XMOD| EM01610
            Euro Rt | OG | RT02382.

            Comment

            • lawman1380
              T.D.C.
              • Nov 2002
              • 75

              #7
              What's the difference between 3.0 and 3.2 I have 3.0 and haven't heard much about it.
              720 Xmag

              Comment

              Working...