What is the MROF for the ult?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trains are bad
    Registered User
    • Oct 2003
    • 1751

    #1

    What is the MROF for the ult?

    I heard the ult does not hold up to the 26 bps w/o shootdown test. At what ROF does the ult start limiting performance? It's in the high teens at least, right?
    TRB's feedback
  • AGDlover
    And boom goes the dynamite
    • Aug 2003
    • 3322

    #2
    ya it will slow ROF down because its useing more return force it needs to rest and whatnot
    Euro E-mag | TL63 | XMOD| EM01610
    Euro Rt | OG | RT02382.

    Comment

    • Dayspring
      aka- The Day Wang

      • May 2001
      • 9664

      #3
      WHAT?!?!

      Originally posted by AGDlover
      ya it will slow ROF down because its useing more return force it needs to rest and whatnot

      Comment

      • CaliMagFan

        #4
        the ult will cut down on the reactive pressure that the valve exerts on your finger on the release of the trigger.... i guess there might be a pont when the valve will not return any more times per second with the ult... but lets put it this way... it is waaaaay faster than you can pull the trigger-legally... when my ult was new it was still very reactive and i could push my halo into missfeeds, so around 20bps+/-... but that was bouncing the trigger in "rapid fire" and was way faster than i could hope to pull unassisted...

        -kyro

        Comment

        • shatter_storm
          Registered User
          • Jun 2004
          • 315

          #5
          My ULT will rapid-fire up to 18 cps. My stock on/off will hit something around that as well, though I havn't done sound analysis on the normal on/off yet. I'm fairly certain I'm limited by the input pressure to the valve - with an adjustable tank I bet I could hit higher speeds.

          The ULT puts a limitation on the user in the form of much easier shortstroking under fast rates of fire. I'm not sure the ULT on/off itself limits the flow at all compared to the stock on/off.
          A good way to find out would be to link the trigger to a solenoid run off of a clock generator and have the valve and on/off be tested that way - just dial up the pulse frequency until the valve starts chuffing or gets shootdown. Too involved for me to test though.

          Comment

          • trains are bad
            Registered User
            • Oct 2003
            • 1751

            #6
            A good way to find out would be to link the trigger to a solenoid run off of a clock generator and have the valve and on/off be tested that way - just dial up the pulse frequency until the valve starts chuffing or gets shootdown. Too involved for me to test though.
            that's what the question was, not 'how fast is the ult in real life'. I thought the ult limited the recharge rate of the xvalve becasus it had a smaller pin. That some of you get full velocity shooting at 20bps seems to indicate it's not a problem though.

            I used to run a ult and I seem to think the RT is more consistent, it might just be placebo effect though.

            I'm building an emag around the ult so I guess I'll see....as soon as I get the money.
            TRB's feedback

            Comment

            • shatter_storm
              Registered User
              • Jun 2004
              • 315

              #7
              Well in theory the ULT should not impose any restriction on the CPS at all - the pin being smaller means *more* air will flow past it, not less. I havn't looked at the housings to figure out if the holes are the same, but it seems to me that they should be.

              Comment

              • Carbon Blue
                Registered User

                • Apr 2003
                • 1103

                #8
                still debating if i should keep my x valve with the stock on off or go to a ULT kit. Im running about 850-900psi on my 68ci 4500 maxflo and it does use quite a bit of air. Im thinking about dropping to 750-800input psi and using the ULT kit.
                :headbang: AGD :headbang:

                Carbon Blue's Buyer/Trader/Seller Feedback!!!!

                Comment

                • trains are bad
                  Registered User
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 1751

                  #9
                  fwiw I don't like the ult on a mech mag.
                  TRB's feedback

                  Comment

                  • CaliMagFan

                    #10
                    do not use ULT on the Emag/Xmag... they're not designed to work with the soleniod... something about the reactive pressure is too light on the solenoid and it causes problems....

                    thats all i can recall on the topic... do some searching on that to make sure one way or the other..

                    -kyro

                    Comment

                    • Joni
                      Registered User
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 942

                      #11
                      I suspect Trains Are Bad is building something new. A smaller noid would be fine with the ULT, just look at the devilmag. Looking at the video, high rates of fire doesn't seem to be a problem


                      ULE RT Custom

                      Red ULE body
                      ULT
                      Electric Logic vert frame

                      Comment

                      • trains are bad
                        Registered User
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 1751

                        #12
                        true I never thought of that.

                        *rubs hands together*
                        TRB's feedback

                        Comment

                        • Dayspring
                          aka- The Day Wang

                          • May 2001
                          • 9664

                          #13
                          It's because the ULT doesn't provide enough return force to reset the heavy sear/solenoid assembly. Using it in a Hyperframe is different as the solenoid is ALOT smaller.

                          Originally posted by CaliMagFan
                          do not use ULT on the Emag/Xmag... they're not designed to work with the soleniod... something about the reactive pressure is too light on the solenoid and it causes problems....

                          thats all i can recall on the topic... do some searching on that to make sure one way or the other..

                          -kyro

                          Comment

                          • CaliMagFan

                            #14
                            its true they reccomend use of the ult for the hyperframe and spyder mag conversions... when trains said he was building an emag around the ULT, i thought he literraly meant that... like hooking emag lowers to his rail and valve....

                            makes me wonder why AGD didnt ditch the larger solenoid for their Xmag when they made the ult.. because like you say Dayspring, its too weak to reset the heavy solenoid currently used.... but if they had gone to a smaller noid, they could have use the ULT and been able to get rid of the sometimes disliked/heavy emag/xmag battery pack in the foregrip and gone with somehting more 9 voltish...

                            penny for your pocket if not for your thoughts...

                            -kyro

                            Comment

                            • Dayspring
                              aka- The Day Wang

                              • May 2001
                              • 9664

                              #15
                              That's why AGD is going about redesigning a new E-marker, to use all the innovations that have come about since the Emag first debuted.

                              Comment

                              Working...