Remote or HP

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smoothice
    Registered User

    • Nov 2006
    • 4579

    #1

    Remote or HP

    I have owned my 68 automag classic for about 10 years now. Used when I bought it. Just gotten back into the sport after finishing college. I have always had problems with my gun freezing up. I have been using a 9oz CO2 tank because that is how it was set up when I bought it. Recently I have been reading posts about either using a remote or switching to HP. Because cost (and my wife's nagging) is an issue i am leaning towards a remote.

    Is there anything wrong with this decision from a performance, wear and tear on gun, and gas efficiency stand point?

    What are the cons of remote to HP?

    Any help is appreciated.
  • Madmarx
    Mentally Unstable

    • Jun 2006
    • 2867

    #2
    HPA is the #1 choice, but if cash is an issue then a remote is the best 2nd choice.
    HPA or nitrogen are more consistant and less likely to give you o-ring issues.
    My advice... DON'T PISS OFF THE WIFE!!!!! You may find yourself without a paintball gun and with blue balls (not paint)!!!
    Get a remote and everyones happy. If you come into some cash then upgrade and sell the remote.

    Comment

    • swalling23589
      Registered User
      • Oct 2006
      • 49

      #3
      I have used a very good expansion chamber and a remote line on myclassic mag. It worked great with both. I have never had any luck with either one alone. I beleave I have them both and they are in very good condition if your interested? I recantly went with a RT PRO valve and LOVE IT!

      Comment

      • Smoothice
        Registered User

        • Nov 2006
        • 4579

        #4
        Originally posted by swalling23589
        I have used a very good expansion chamber and a remote line on myclassic mag. It worked great with both. I have never had any luck with either one alone. I beleave I have them both and they are in very good condition if your interested? I recantly went with a RT PRO valve and LOVE IT!
        Are you still shooting CO2 and no longer need the remote and expansion chamber because you have the RT PRO valve?

        I would be interested in your expansion chamber and remote. Price and picture would be great.

        Comment

        • Smoothice
          Registered User

          • Nov 2006
          • 4579

          #5
          Originally posted by Madmarx
          HPA is the #1 choice, but if cash is an issue then a remote is the best 2nd choice.
          HPA or nitrogen are more consistant and less likely to give you o-ring issues.
          My advice... DON'T PISS OFF THE WIFE!!!!! You may find yourself without a paintball gun and with blue balls (not paint)!!!
          Get a remote and everyones happy. If you come into some cash then upgrade and sell the remote.
          Madmarx...
          do you think an expansion chamber is necessary?

          Comment

          • swalling23589
            Registered User
            • Oct 2006
            • 49

            #6
            I am useing HPA now, give me a few seconds and I will go and see if I have the Expansion chamber. I know exactly where the remote is. I payed $45 for the remote. I used it 3 times before I got the HPA. I'll get pic's as well.

            Comment

            • swalling23589
              Registered User
              • Oct 2006
              • 49

              #7
              I found the expansion chanmer. It is in excalant shape, No scratches and, the O-ring looks good. I am horrable at posting pics. I will give it a shot. If they don't show up I can send them to you via e-mail

              Comment

              • swalling23589
                Registered User
                • Oct 2006
                • 49

                #8
                It won't let me upload them give me your E-mail and I can send them to you!

                Comment

                • Smoothice
                  Registered User

                  • Nov 2006
                  • 4579

                  #9
                  Originally posted by swalling23589
                  It won't let me upload them give me your E-mail and I can send them to you!
                  [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • swalling23589
                    Registered User
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 49

                    #10
                    You Have Mail!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • Madmarx
                      Mentally Unstable

                      • Jun 2006
                      • 2867

                      #11
                      An expansion chamber certainly won't hurt. With co2 every little bit helps.
                      Can you use just a remote sure. Without a remote definately use an expansion chamber and an antisiphon tank (just an internal pipe bent upward).

                      Comment

                      • swalling23589
                        Registered User
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 49

                        #12
                        I alwayse had issues just useing the remote or just he expansion chamber. With both the only issue I hade was volocity drop off. That problem is cured with my new RT PRO valve. I love that thing. now I'm looking for a differant grip frame and a differand body! I just bought a RT PRO rail.

                        Comment

                        • Smoothice
                          Registered User

                          • Nov 2006
                          • 4579

                          #13
                          Originally posted by swalling23589
                          I alwayse had issues just useing the remote or just he expansion chamber. With both the only issue I hade was volocity drop off. That problem is cured with my new RT PRO valve. I love that thing. now I'm looking for a differant grip frame and a differand body! I just bought a RT PRO rail.
                          Is the velocity drop off due to the inconsistency of CO2 or does that have more to do with Valve?

                          I guess my question is did you have velocity drop off when you switched to HP but still used old Valve?

                          Comment

                          • swalling23589
                            Registered User
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 49

                            #14
                            It is mostly due to the CO2. I used HPA on my classic and it helped a lot, it was a little better than the expansion and the remote but not that much. To eliminate the drop off you would have to go with an RT, RT PRP or X-valxe.

                            Comment

                            • swalling23589
                              Registered User
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 49

                              #15
                              The best option in my opinion is Go with the HPA tank. That is more expensive! It depends on how much you play as well. If you go with and HPA I would recomend a carbon tank. I bought a 78cc 3000psi aluminum tank and HATE IT. Its to heavy. I am looking to buy a smaller carbon tank. Also I personaly reccomend going with a 4500 psi tank. I'm not sure but I sure a lot of air with my tank. I think that is due to not having a on off valve though. Loose a lot taking the tank on and off!

                              I would be happy to sell you the remote and chamber if your interested. It will be cheaper than buying a HPA but in the long run the tank would be put to more use if your planning on playing a lot!

                              Comment

                              Working...