On the MQ valve

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trains are bad
    Registered User
    • Oct 2003
    • 1751

    #1

    On the MQ valve

    I'm not sure I understand this thing. Since the MQ valve for cockers replaces the hammer, and is electronically controlled, then there in no need for a cocking rod or even a back block correct? If so the ram would only be driving the bolt, alowing for crazy low cycling pressures?

    If so, how long then till someone turns a cocker bolt down properly, puts oring grooves in it and oring grooves in the body, or whatever, and fits hose barbs to the body to cycle the bolt shocker style eliminating the ram and cocking rod altogether?
    TRB's feedback
  • noahyay
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 350

    #2
    i would say not long

    yes you need the bolt and cocking rod

    no you dont need the back block

    the mq gun and not the upgrade is a half block sized cocker and if there is a cocking rod it is very small.

    ill try and make an animation so check my website for the next few days
    rt pro w/ lvlx etc.
    custom milled out y frame
    empire barrel kit
    ult
    custom 15 degree
    custom milled rail
    cut ule body
    steel hose with QD's
    custom welded drop
    90/45 nitro duck x-stream
    halo tsa w/ custom paint job
    soon to get warp

    custom palmer microrock front grip for future trigger for ^

    http://www.noahkool.com

    Comment

    • Enos Shenk
      Shenko Heavy Industries
      • Nov 2003
      • 76

      #3
      Shocker style?

      I believe you mean Sovereign style
      --Enos Shenk
      --Moderator http://www.tippmann.com
      --Admin http://www.paintballchat.net

      Comment

      Working...