My pneumag is done... finally!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sTaLa
    Registered User
    • Mar 2006
    • 333

    #1

    My pneumag is done... finally!!!

    It's done, and I'm really happy with the result. The trigger is really light and thanks to the stoppers, its travel is incredibly short.

    Here are some pictures of it:



    And a video. Don't laught at me. It's the first time I ever try to "walk" a trigger.
    Click here to watch My-pneumag

    Give me your opinion.
  • p8ntbal4me
    No more UTBs!
    • Aug 2003
    • 2560

    #2
    Just going by the photos on this comment:

    Getting your MPA-3 parallel with the top of the frame and as close to the bottom of the sear is key to making that thing faster.

    The way it works is fine, and you did a good job!

    Other things to try is using a QEV to speed it up some.

    Just some ideas.

    At anyrate, it works, your ideas are realities, and you can now go smoke some IONs.

    _______________________
    Jai "P8ntbal4me" Menard

    Comment

    • sTaLa
      Registered User
      • Mar 2006
      • 333

      #3
      Thanks for the comment.

      At first the actuator was parrallel to the sear but was too high and the pull was too heavy. So I just decided to give an angle to the actuator; that allowed me to use the same holes in my grip frame (lowering the actuator would make it too low and would force me to tap new holes for the set srews).

      I thought about using a QEV but I'm not too sure about the benefits of it .

      Thanks anyway .
      Alex

      Comment

      • Pneumagger
        I like 'Mags.

        • Jun 2006
        • 3556

        #4
        Originally posted by sTaLa
        Thanks for the comment.

        At first the actuator was parrallel to the sear but was too high and the pull was too heavy. So I just decided to give an angle to the actuator; that allowed me to use the same holes in my grip frame (lowering the actuator would make it too low and would force me to tap new holes for the set srews).

        I thought about using a QEV but I'm not too sure about the benefits of it .

        Thanks anyway .
        Alex
        good thinking, giving the actuator longer travel to take advantage of lower pressure. Just keep an eye on the sear for a bit to make sure you don't have a ton of wear.

        Now get off AO, get some, and make us a VID

        Comment

        • sTaLa
          Registered User
          • Mar 2006
          • 333

          #5
          Originally posted by Pneumagger
          Now get off AO, get some, and make us a VID
          There's already a vid in my first post. But I totally suck at walking a trigger... for the moment:P:P:P.

          Comment

          • p8ntbal4me
            No more UTBs!
            • Aug 2003
            • 2560

            #6
            Originally posted by sTaLa
            Thanks for the comment.

            At first the actuator was parrallel to the sear but was too high and the pull was too heavy. So I just decided to give an angle to the actuator; that allowed me to use the same holes in my grip frame (lowering the actuator would make it too low and would force me to tap new holes for the set srews).

            I thought about using a QEV but I'm not too sure about the benefits of it .

            Thanks anyway .
            Alex

            Ask Pneumagger to tell you the REAL advatages for the use of a QEV.

            I know what they do in my EP kit,... but as far as manual action, he would have your answer.
            _______________________
            Jai "P8ntbal4me" Menard

            Comment

            • sTaLa
              Registered User
              • Mar 2006
              • 333

              #7
              Originally posted by p8ntbal4me
              Ask Pneumagger to tell you the REAL advatages for the use of a QEV.

              I know what they do in my EP kit,... but as far as manual action, he would have your answer.
              I know it is supposed to raise the ROF by exhausting the air contained between the valve and the actuator. What I think is that since there is less pressure behind the actuator, the emptiness of air allows the piston to come back faster, therefore to cycle faster.

              But my first setup (not installed in the frame) was with a QEV and I didn't see any noticeable difference. And since the MSV-2 exhausts the air itself, I thought it was not worth giving me the trouble trying to install the QEV as close as possible to the actuator.

              Maybe I'm wrong though.

              Alex

              Comment

              • sTaLa
                Registered User
                • Mar 2006
                • 333

                #8
                Originally posted by Pneumagger
                Just keep an eye on the sear for a bit to make sure you don't have a ton of wear.
                You mean wear that would be cause by the piston not hiting the sear perpendicularly?

                Comment

                • p8ntbal4me
                  No more UTBs!
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 2560

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sTaLa
                  I know it is supposed to raise the ROF by exhausting the air contained between the valve and the actuator. What I think is that since there is less pressure behind the actuator, the emptiness of air allows the piston to come back faster, therefore to cycle faster.

                  But my first setup (not installed in the frame) was with a QEV and I didn't see any noticeable difference. And since the MSV-2 exhausts the air itself, I thought it was not worth giving me the trouble trying to install the QEV as close as possible to the actuator.

                  Maybe I'm wrong though.

                  Alex
                  The MPA3 has a vet hole to dump the air in the front (if any) of the piston. The QEV is to dump the excess air in the hose between the actuator your using and the MPA3.

                  From what I hear,... makes a HUGE difference in cycle time.

                  Basically when your spring in your ram pushes the rod back, it has to do something with that air in the hose between the plunger and the actuator. So it has to fight it a little bit to go back into the home possision.

                  The QEV is set to open after a 5psi drop is met in the line, so the second the ram hits the sear and goes null for a fraction of a second, it opens the QEV and vets out the air with no back force to the actuator.
                  _______________________
                  Jai "P8ntbal4me" Menard

                  Comment

                  • longi
                    I love Real Ale alot. Hic!
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 490

                    #10
                    Got sound but no video! Sounds pretty good though! You might find it easier to walk the trigger if you slacken off the vertically mounted trigger stop. I found that in both the frames i did, if i kept a 2.5mm-3.0mm trigger pull walking became much easier. I did dial out all of the slack from the underside stop though to give a more "modern" feel. I shaved off the rear of the intellitrigger safety off so i could keep the use of the safety. Interesting MPA-3 angle, let us know if you find that you get any wear on the plastic plunger of the MPA-3 due to the angle at which it makes contact with the sear. Which on/off are you using? Try experimenting with a few slighly different setups, as fine makes all the difference! It sounds like your almost there!

                    Comment

                    • Spider-TW
                      U R techno-literate!

                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3554

                      #11


                      Do you have a sear stop? It looks like you have a little extra travel there. That can help in more ways than a QEV. The MPA-3 will use less air and have less air in it to vent.

                      Got any LPR pictures yet?

                      Comment

                      • sTaLa
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2006
                        • 333

                        #12
                        Nope, I don't have any sear stop. Since the on/off pin is supposed to be pushed down by the valve (pushing the sear back by the same occasion), I don't see any real advantage of having a sear stop. Plus I don't like taping to many holes in my gun.

                        Comment

                        • sTaLa
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 333

                          #13
                          Here's the LPR picture. I just need to get the battery pack anodized and to change that braided hose for a shorter one.

                          <a href="http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5225860"><img src="http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/4/10320300252.jpg" alt="Click to enlarge."></a>

                          Comment

                          • Spider-TW
                            U R techno-literate!

                            • Oct 2006
                            • 3554

                            #14
                            Originally posted by sTaLa
                            Nope, I don't have any sear stop. Since the on/off pin is supposed to be pushed down by the valve (pushing the sear back by the same occasion), I don't see any real advantage of having a sear stop. Plus I don't like taping to many holes in my gun.
                            Good point. The sear should hit the bottom of the on/off anyway. Plus I don't like tapping any holes in my gun.

                            But sometimes I do.
                            Last edited by Spider-TW; 04-20-2007, 04:50 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Spider-TW
                              U R techno-literate!

                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3554

                              #15
                              It just now hit me... what's the battery pack for???

                              Comment

                              Working...