Its YOUR turn - pick which Ad AGD will run next!

[joeyjoe367]

I like 3. Humor seems to reach more people than Attitude. Coffey cup stain and Donut Crumbs have GOT to be there tho

[Cliffio]

and instead of a folder, make it a newspaper
with an artical about the warp

i think 3 is a winner
its funny and gets the point across

Cliff

[Dubstar112]

I liked # 2:

Although it may come off as a bit cocky to some people.. I think it has the attitude needed to get people buying it

[cphilip]

Milk Carton. Goes along with the Got Game = E-Mag backwards thing too! Milk commercials get it? See if you can work that in to the graphic and idea as well.

[sajohnston]

#3 May I suggest a silhouette of a WARP equipped mag user peeking around the side of the carton Kilroy style or on another "photo" paperclipped to the paper? That way you keep the humor and emphasize the advantageous silhouette.

[bofh]

I'd say go with #3.

It reminds me on the old Infocom ads that ran in the 80's. Those really got to buy a lot of software.

[Manuel_FZR]

All three are verry nice! But the "missing..." is great! *rotfl* Also I love the ENGAGE ...

[Doobie]

Edgy and in your face is what sell these days, that's why I voted for #2. But, #3 is so good that it deserves a consecutive run. I would run them both a couple of pages apart.

[udtseal]

#2 all the way, for the simple reason that Xzion said, you are advertising two at the same time!!! Then, peple will think "Omg, look a the emag, a high performance marker that takes that high performance warp feed." And you will advertise both at once. Instant product recognition: warp feed + e-mag = AGD's innovation and high performance" somehting like that. maybe....

I do like the milk carton though! haha pretty funny

[Dave]

DEFINITELY #2!!!!!!!!

I think some people see the warp feed on a gun like that, wonder what it is, and maybe never see it again...so by seeing that picture, maybe it will bring up a "hey, I remember seeing one of those" and then they can learn more about it. This ad lets people know who is runnin' the show, whether they like it or not. It lets you know that if you see one of these AGD Warp Feeds, you better take a good look at what totally ripped you up on the field. You don't even have to include the "You won't see it on the field" thing, just the "Take a good look before the game" is hardcore enough to let people know they are gonna get torn up if they go against someone with a warp feed. I think this ad is more bold than #3, although I still like #3, I love #2!

I'd say run #2, if you have enought $$ to do another, go with #3.

-Dave

[FaSSt]

# 2 or 3

In addition to your main point, make sure that you list, in bulleted format, the other advantages of the Warp Feed as well. Many people do not consider the lack of hopper hits its greatest advantage, but it will do as the focus of the ad.

Benefits:

1. Positive feeding under the highest rates of fire for bursts of up to 20(?) rounds;
2. Makes shooting out of the left side of a bunker much easier to learn and do;
3. Makes sighting over the barrel possible in many applications.

Include a link to a URL where people can look at pics of installed Warps on a variety of markers, not just Mags. Also write at least a few sentences about each benefit, with illustrations where possible.


Forget Design #1. You'd have to be either a Trekky or a geek to it appreciate it. In addition to being non-descriptive of the benefits, it is also potentially a violation of intellectual property laws.

[Rynoboy06]

I think 2 is a more widely acceptable add, remember, we're calling the very people we want to buy warps "losers" in add 3. I do think it's funny, but I think 2 has more potential. Also, add three has 'loser' misspelled as "looser". Unless that's a play-on-words for "playing loose". I think both 2 and three are worthy.

[Ronn]

Steve:

I go with # 2.

Nice ills. btw!

[joeyjoe367]

Having both #2 and #3 Close together in a magazine would Definately make an impression.

If it's within AGD's advertising budget, I'd say "go for it"

[dawump]

I'd say go with number two, although personally I prefer both of the others.

I think that number 2 is the most direct and will hit the mark even if the slogan isn't understood as intended, because it shows the product and makes it look cool - which is probably most appropriate for the target audience.

Keith