Instead of concentraiting on the fall through of celeb 2005, for a change of tone, lets reflect on past events.
OK, for all the Tom Kaye ballers, I think its obviouse that 2004 was a big hit with everyone. As for Shatner's ballers it had to either be 2002 CPX or 2003 at EMR. I'm biased because I only played 2003 and 2004.
2003 was a domination. The Cav dominated out of sheer numbers and equipment. I believe the Raiders tank even broke down during the game giving us (Cav) an upper hand. If anyone remembers the beginning of the BIG GAME, it seemed the Posse or Raiders were puching us almost all the way back to the insertion point. Somehow we beat them back and eventually won the game. I know the tank really moved the battle lines from one end of the field to the other. I really don't know how Kaye's team could have won. I wish they would have let them share the tank, or did they, and I was just shooting myself in the foot at the time?
2002 again seemed like Shatner had the most players, but also seemed like they had more players against them at any other game until 2004. When Tom's team + Cow's team matched up, they did have more players than Shat right?
1. I have two questions for everyone, what game seemed to be the most balanced? The reason I ask is because almost every year seems to be lopsided?
2.How does anyone think the last 3 games could have been won by the other teams? Was it number of players per team, bad cordination on the field, too hard of missions without enough points late in the day? Help me out you hard core players.
3. Is Weltman and the Weltman's Pack a deciding factor post 2002 games? Don't answere this unless you feel the urge.
T.M.
OK, for all the Tom Kaye ballers, I think its obviouse that 2004 was a big hit with everyone. As for Shatner's ballers it had to either be 2002 CPX or 2003 at EMR. I'm biased because I only played 2003 and 2004.
2003 was a domination. The Cav dominated out of sheer numbers and equipment. I believe the Raiders tank even broke down during the game giving us (Cav) an upper hand. If anyone remembers the beginning of the BIG GAME, it seemed the Posse or Raiders were puching us almost all the way back to the insertion point. Somehow we beat them back and eventually won the game. I know the tank really moved the battle lines from one end of the field to the other. I really don't know how Kaye's team could have won. I wish they would have let them share the tank, or did they, and I was just shooting myself in the foot at the time?
2002 again seemed like Shatner had the most players, but also seemed like they had more players against them at any other game until 2004. When Tom's team + Cow's team matched up, they did have more players than Shat right?
1. I have two questions for everyone, what game seemed to be the most balanced? The reason I ask is because almost every year seems to be lopsided?
2.How does anyone think the last 3 games could have been won by the other teams? Was it number of players per team, bad cordination on the field, too hard of missions without enough points late in the day? Help me out you hard core players.
3. Is Weltman and the Weltman's Pack a deciding factor post 2002 games? Don't answere this unless you feel the urge.
T.M.

Awesome shot. I personally feel that on that day I played better than I ever had before. So I think 2004 was my most memorable game, despite our major loss.
Comment