I'm coming back from a little break from paintball. One thing I have noticed is that paintball has not progressed very well. I'm talking about locally to tournament circut/senerio.
I most commonly hear people compair paintball to the x-games and think we should follow in that sports path to become bigger/better. I have also heard the Olympics mentioned consistantly as the 'next big thing', but I dont consider that to be a realistic option till we have some agreement on a version of paintball to use. There are slight rule changes but for the most part the major olympic sports are the same, think basketball, bigger lanes, but still 5v5 set time most points wins. Think about the diff between NPPL and XBall.
I imagine one of the hard things about paintball is there is no governing body so to speak that can inact changes. What might be better sports to compair us to and attempt to model things after is the MLS(major league soccer) (minus the 150millon dollar brit) and AFL (arena football). Both I think have to be considered a sucsess and took similar approaches to accomplish this.
Instead of concentrating on TV deals they made a point to make a very watchable product that has a local following. The MLS puts a lot of work into picking cities to give teams to and wants every team to have a stadium. They want it filled with fans and keep ultimate control over about everything. The AFL allows the owners much more control but still clearly wants packed local stadiums. A more if you get enough spectators together the tv crews will follow approach.
What if tournaments should be gatherings of regonal winners, i.e. invite only, and put more on the local fields. You could have a roming crew to set up fields, supply refs etc. and bring in two pro teams per event to play. So you have a regonal tournament with the Ironmen vs. Strange headlining it. 2-4 times a year gather up all the regonal champs and have the type of tournament you have now. I think this would bring in more fans. People would become more vested in their local teams. You would get a lot more teams involved, since a big part of the expense is travle/hotel etc. Find 3-5 decent fields in each state and you could involve a lot of teams/people. Say that each field gets to send one am/ and 3 rookie teams on to the major tournament, something like that. Also we should look in how to design fields to make them specator friendly. Maybe square fields arnt the best. I like the NPPL green/red paint on the ground idea but maybe make the fields more diamond shaped get creative to give the fans watching a better show.
Just my late night thoughts, havent really worked it out so do flame me too bad.
I most commonly hear people compair paintball to the x-games and think we should follow in that sports path to become bigger/better. I have also heard the Olympics mentioned consistantly as the 'next big thing', but I dont consider that to be a realistic option till we have some agreement on a version of paintball to use. There are slight rule changes but for the most part the major olympic sports are the same, think basketball, bigger lanes, but still 5v5 set time most points wins. Think about the diff between NPPL and XBall.
I imagine one of the hard things about paintball is there is no governing body so to speak that can inact changes. What might be better sports to compair us to and attempt to model things after is the MLS(major league soccer) (minus the 150millon dollar brit) and AFL (arena football). Both I think have to be considered a sucsess and took similar approaches to accomplish this.
Instead of concentrating on TV deals they made a point to make a very watchable product that has a local following. The MLS puts a lot of work into picking cities to give teams to and wants every team to have a stadium. They want it filled with fans and keep ultimate control over about everything. The AFL allows the owners much more control but still clearly wants packed local stadiums. A more if you get enough spectators together the tv crews will follow approach.
What if tournaments should be gatherings of regonal winners, i.e. invite only, and put more on the local fields. You could have a roming crew to set up fields, supply refs etc. and bring in two pro teams per event to play. So you have a regonal tournament with the Ironmen vs. Strange headlining it. 2-4 times a year gather up all the regonal champs and have the type of tournament you have now. I think this would bring in more fans. People would become more vested in their local teams. You would get a lot more teams involved, since a big part of the expense is travle/hotel etc. Find 3-5 decent fields in each state and you could involve a lot of teams/people. Say that each field gets to send one am/ and 3 rookie teams on to the major tournament, something like that. Also we should look in how to design fields to make them specator friendly. Maybe square fields arnt the best. I like the NPPL green/red paint on the ground idea but maybe make the fields more diamond shaped get creative to give the fans watching a better show.
Just my late night thoughts, havent really worked it out so do flame me too bad.
. You mentioned "watchability". Watching the NPPL, it is difficult for someone new to follow. two teams start, slide and dive, and then suddenly players get called out, and than its over. Comparing to sports such as soccer where the ball in play is easily viewed by the audience creating suspense, and many rounds are played.
Comment