i guess the mag is not the fastest gun out

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • atm743
    AKA & Macdev fan
    • Aug 2003
    • 3235

    #1

    i guess the mag is not the fastest gun out

    Click here to see Video

    tbh i dont think this is true. i still think the mag is still the fastest marker next to the viking but idk.

    what you guys think?

    ~my e-mag~

    ~ule frame~
    ~ule rail~
    ~x-valve~
    ~3.2 software~
    ~polished no-rise body~
    ~black 10" freak kit~
    ~smoke halo b~
    ~Fl05283 68 3000 flatline~

    "Let them eat war [x2]
    That's how to ration the poor
    Let them eat war [x2]

    There's an urgent need to feed"
  • nevtangle
    Registered Automag Shooter
    • Oct 2005
    • 372

    #2
    http://automags.org/forums/showthrea...ighlight=40bps

    Myself and another person analyzed this and didn't see where it hit 40. 30ish is quite away from 40.

    Comment

    • rawbutter
      Registered User
      • Feb 2007
      • 1463

      #3
      I'm getting 30 as well... although it does sound faster than that.

      The gun is probably designed for people will poor self esteem. However fast you're shooting, it tells you that you're going 30% faster. And you're not going to question the readout, right? I mean... computers are NEVER wrong.

      By the way... there's another video right next to this one on that page titled, "My 41 bps Ion." But does the video actually even show the gun shoot? Nope. The kid is just playing around with the lights.

      Comment

      • Rudz
        Registered User

        • Apr 2005
        • 5087

        #4
        lol, yeah thats no where near 40 :rofl:
        BEO MAFIA
        sigpic

        Comment

        • Zone Drifter
          Here and there...

          • Mar 2007
          • 541

          #5


          No idea how many bps that is, but I just thought it was hilarious that they did that with an excellerator. XD I used to own a few, and might get myself a 6.0 again just because I love how the body looks.

          Comment

          • Andrewliu6294
            Nothing to do but wait.
            • Jul 2007
            • 258

            #6
            sounded like they were running outta gas.

            funny they were doing that with a gravity loader, and CO2.

            Comment

            • Chaos_Theory!

              #7
              Those screens on the gun arent accurate at all either.

              Comment

              • surfbum
                Unregistered User
                • Feb 2006
                • 736

                #8
                the reason the lcd reads high is because it gives you the BPS calculated from the shortest time between two balls being fired, i.e. for at least two balls he shot 40 bps but he averaged much less

                Comment

                • SR_matt
                  Santa Sucks
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 1072

                  #9
                  Originally posted by rawbutter
                  I'm getting 30 as well... although it does sound faster than that.

                  The gun is probably designed for people will poor self esteem. However fast you're shooting, it tells you that you're going 30% faster. And you're not going to question the readout, right? I mean... computers are NEVER wrong.

                  By the way... there's another video right next to this one on that page titled, "My 41 bps Ion." But does the video actually even show the gun shoot? Nope. The kid is just playing around with the lights.
                  "Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest." -Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

                  dont blame the computer, blame the programer
                  -matt

                  Comment

                  • mobsterboy
                    Mr.StealYoDallara

                    • Aug 2004
                    • 2371

                    #10
                    if it was truly 40 bps, that would be about 4 seconds there and most of the hopper would have been empty. Good joke though, cuz their hopper was still half full. Maybe, just MAYBE if they try a Qloader then they might actually achieve 40 bps, MAYBE... Until then they reached 40 Cps. Cycles dont really count though or Vikings would have won long ago.
                    RAWR
                    Dallara Den

                    Comment

                    • SR_matt
                      Santa Sucks
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 1072

                      #11
                      Originally posted by mobsterboy
                      if it was truly 40 bps, that would be about 4 seconds there and most of the hopper would have been empty. Good joke though, cuz their hopper was still half full. Maybe, just MAYBE if they try a Qloader then they might actually achieve 40 bps, MAYBE... Until then they reached 40 Cps. Cycles dont really count though or Vikings would have won long ago.
                      remember most if not all of the bps counters take the 2 shots that have the shortest time, calculate it as if that was kept up and then they give you that as the BPS

                      -matt

                      Comment

                      • Resurection
                        bringing the game back
                        • Aug 2005
                        • 923

                        #12
                        Keyword = PEAKED

                        I noticed the title of their video on the second viewing. Oh well...some people just don't know what reality is though.

                        Comment

                        • nevtangle
                          Registered Automag Shooter
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 372

                          #13
                          Originally posted by surfbum
                          the reason the lcd reads high is because it gives you the BPS calculated from the shortest time between two balls being fired, i.e. for at least two balls he shot 40 bps but he averaged much less
                          Right. It never actually fired 40 balls in a seconds time.

                          Comment

                          • drg
                            Half-cocked
                            • Oct 2004
                            • 1112

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SR_matt
                            remember most if not all of the bps counters take the 2 shots that have the shortest time, calculate it as if that was kept up and then they give you that as the BPS

                            -matt
                            I can tell you that the Eclipse ROF counter does not work this way, you will not get a reading until you've actually held a certain ROF for at least a second (i.e. it counts shots over a second).

                            That said I do not know how accurate that counting is at these rates of fire, but I can tell you that at BPSes in the teens it is dead accurate.
                            View my feedback here

                            Comment

                            • angrysasquatch
                              Registered User
                              • Jun 2006
                              • 279

                              #15
                              Yeah, just because there were 40 electrical impulses going out per second doesn't mean it shot that. Then you also need to know if there was drop-off at 40 bps.

                              Comment

                              Working...