classic SP lie debunked

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • senghing27
    I lol'ed as well
    • Aug 2005
    • 707

    #16
    Lol Physics.... Who needs that.

    Comment

    • nevtangle
      Registered Automag Shooter
      • Oct 2005
      • 372

      #17
      It's funny that Sean hasn't bothered to chime in on this. He stopped responding in the other thread too. He logged in today but no words of wisdom. I'm sure his words are better received on pbn than they are here.

      Comment

      • JesseB
        Medallion Gold Plus Club
        • Apr 2003
        • 547

        #18
        physics shmysics

        getting shot with a shocker in 98 (before max flows had tournament locks and someone could have easily been cheating) from super far away and getting a boo boo is way more proof than bench testing.
        RATPULSE SHOOTER

        GREAT Traders: xspyx, predfan66, eric13, Ring,James, Dansim, JadedT, phil16628 anyone I have forgot pm me I'll reference you also.


        Buy Blink's Black Dragun!

        Comment

        • senghing27
          I lol'ed as well
          • Aug 2005
          • 707

          #19
          Cp, nice work man. I enjoyed your rant, and also, I'm glad you didn't fall down any stairs in the 3rd video while filming yourself.

          Now get the Carter vid up

          Comment

          • Hilltop Customs
            Registered User
            • Aug 2007
            • 1260

            #20
            Originally posted by thejere
            Sarcasm? It never comes across well on the web
            lol, I tried to lay it on thick and gooey too

            Comment

            • Hilltop Customs
              Registered User
              • Aug 2007
              • 1260

              #21
              Originally posted by nevtangle
              It's funny that Sean hasn't bothered to chime in on this. He stopped responding in the other thread too. He logged in today but no words of wisdom. I'm sure his words are better received on pbn than they are here.
              well the way I see it, he has 3 options......admit he was wrong(doubt it), or claim the conditions of the test make it not valid(probably), or avoid it all together(just sad)

              Give him time to try and think of a counter argument that cant be disproved easily.....

              Comment

              • cockerpunk
                Haters Gonna Hate
                • Sep 2004
                • 1383

                #22
                i will let sean post his response on his own. we have been trading a couple of PMs on the nation.
                "because every vengeful cop with a lesbian daughter, is having a bad day, and looking for someone to blame"

                Comment

                • Ruler_Mark
                  AKAOG.ORG
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 2600

                  #23
                  DUUDE you are a complete TOOL. YOU FORGOT THE MOST important component.

                  Zee 1337 cheat3r b045d.

                  Remember to solve FSDO(First Shot Drop Off) boards were made to increase the dwell on the first shot. Well over the chrono it went to 265fps. BUT then the first shot went and hit 26500000*10^10000^100000fps and broke the speed of light and look lyke a lazer beam or something and went soooooo fast you didnt see it hit the target till the 5th time around de erth.







                  Now that I have fun, GG Sean GTFO with your propaganda. I love how he words everything so sp has an out.

                  Comment

                  • maniacmechanic
                    PrestonCoPaintball
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 3453

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Arstron
                    So I guess the apple really can fall far from the apple tree, if its a low preasure apple?

                    Perhaps smart parts needs a new slogan, "Smart Parts, Debunking Sir Isaac Newton one paintball at a time."
                    low pressure apple ; love it

                    Comment

                    • bryceeden
                      www.vernalpaintball.com
                      • Dec 2002
                      • 1076

                      #25
                      He responded in the thread on PBN

                      Originally posted by Sean@smartpartswest
                      Thank you cockerpunk for proving many people wrong, along with myself with your video. I thank you for taking the time out to do it and there would not be very many people I would trust to prove me wrong.

                      I have based most of my personal thinking about range on guns all based on what I saw at IAO when the flatline came out. Apparently, I am guessing Graham was able to do it because he was so short and was able to angle it higher. And since it was IAO, I am sure I probably had a long island ice tea in hand as well. So, thank you cocker punk for enlightening the entire paintball community and myself. The debate on range shall forever be proven to this...

                      Every gun, no matter what kind, will have the same range at the same velocity. Excluding barrels that intentionally put backspin on the paintballs. And your videos will forever be used to prove this.

                      And I look forward to more videos from you as well busting the paintball myths and urban legends. This has also been a great discussion as well.

                      Comment

                      • Hexis
                        Green Mag Freak
                        • Sep 2001
                        • 2427

                        #26
                        Originally posted by bryceeden
                        He responded in the thread on PBN
                        I'm waiting for the universe to implode, a SP rep showed a clue publicly. Wait, maybe his account was hacked.

                        Comment

                        • Ruler_Mark
                          AKAOG.ORG
                          • Aug 2007
                          • 2600

                          #27
                          you notice the immense sarcasm in that?

                          Comment

                          • snoopay700
                            Serious About Men

                            • Jan 2006
                            • 3071

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Ruler_Mark
                            you notice the immense sarcasm in that?
                            He's also trying to perpetuate that he saw it despite others there that said that it would have been a huge deal, yet oddly no one was talking about this happening.
                            Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

                            Comment

                            • Texas Trigger
                              Wannabe jetjock
                              • Sep 2007
                              • 280

                              #29
                              Pwned. So, so, OMG, what myth are you going to debunk next?
                              Last edited by Texas Trigger; 06-04-2008, 01:03 PM.

                              Comment

                              • questionful
                                LNIB
                                • Dec 2006
                                • 1416

                                #30
                                I didn't notice sarcasm. I think he is respectably admitting he was wrong. Still not as good as admitting he was lying, but good enough for me. I haven't been following the thread, but it sounds like victory to me. Yeah cockerpunk!!!


                                Last edited by questionful; 06-04-2008, 01:28 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...