Bob Long's M-Tac Scenario *NEW* (scenario MARQ)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bunny5
    lurking
    • Jan 2005
    • 1099

    #1

    Bob Long's M-Tac Scenario *NEW* (scenario MARQ)

    Bob Long's M-Tac Scenario

    Ripped right from the depths of the nation.

    Terry59: It works off the Proficiency Engine just recently released for all Marq's.
    Features, a cocking lever to electronically charge the weapon system.
    3-Way Selector switch for semi, ramp and FA
    Internalized high pressure routing to eliminate the need for fittings and macroline.
    Bottle Asa built into the Grip.
    Grip accepts traditional .45 panels
    Upper receiver features full length Picatinny Rails.
    Marq Series HP reg built into the cartridge magazine.
    Easy accessible LPR adjuster.
    4C Eye capable
    Offset feed
    Upper and Lower all aluminum construction
    Cocker thread barrel system with optional sound suppressing capabilities.





















    Yeah, it will kick the new BT gun's ***
    Last edited by bunny5; 06-12-2008, 08:12 AM.
  • Rudz
    Registered User

    • Apr 2005
    • 5087

    #2
    Sound supression? I wanna hear more abt that!!!
    BEO MAFIA
    sigpic

    Comment

    • BigEvil
      www.BigEvilOnline.com

      • Feb 2005
      • 9333

      #3
      WOW I remember how people used to try and persuade me that there was no market for scenario gear.

      Comment

      • Spider-TW
        U R techno-literate!

        • Oct 2006
        • 3554

        #4
        Originally posted by BigEvil
        WOW I remember how people used to try and persuade me that there was no market for scenario gear.
        It's turning into a serious turf war now. Even if the market isn't huge, the competition is getting interesting.

        Comment

        • warbeak2099
          That is my foot!
          • Jan 2004
          • 4447

          #5
          I say kudos to BT and BLAST for these higher end scenario guns. I laughed at people for so long for buying $500 spyder clones lol. Add these to the Tac-One and there is a good market for higher end milsims.
          My Feedback

          Comment

          • BigEvil
            www.BigEvilOnline.com

            • Feb 2005
            • 9333

            #6
            Originally posted by warbeak2099
            I say kudos to BT and BLAST for these higher end scenario guns. I laughed at people for so long for buying $500 spyder clones lol. Add these to the Tac-One and there is a good market for higher end milsims.
            Exactly. Shows that there is room for improvement with the Tac one also.

            Comment

            • Storminnorman
              Registered User
              • May 2005
              • 852

              #7
              Well it looks cheesy to me. I guess when you have this to compare to

              A local buddy design's and makes them by hand. His guns are the top of the line milsim because they are a m4/ar15 shell with a automag valve inside. It doesn't get anymore real and perfect looking. He is a awesome machinist, and the price tag is what holds some people back, but belief me, quality always shoots straight and it would last forever. Plus everything you can get for a m4/ar15 you can put on this gun.

              Comment

              • trevorjk
                <S>WooLooLoo</S>
                • Dec 2002
                • 4324

                #8
                that looks ugly, like they machined a new body for the marq, then threw tippman parts on it. definetly not worth the probably 650+ price tag that marqs are. hopefully the front stuff is optional? eitherway props to Blast for entering the scenerio market as well :)
                Last edited by trevorjk; 06-12-2008, 07:49 PM.
                t33kyboy "So if a cat is dropped from 11 inches, it will most likely die."

                Comment

                • Oregon_pb_
                  Senior PBaller. 15+yrs
                  • Oct 2001
                  • 527

                  #9
                  Here's my scenario gun, I spent $230 minus the hopper which I actually use my old revy not the vlocity shown.

                  scenario is where the future is, tourny's will continue to kill themselves due to jackasses being allowed in the front door.





                  fyi: even being smart parts, its a cheap *** gun I don't mind taking out camping with me, playing at night, tossing on the ground and generally beating to hell and back. I would never abuse my mag, aka, borgs in this fashion.
                  "Accuracy by volume has been, and will remain, the best way to score eliminations" Tom Kaye

                  FeedBack

                  [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • Chronobreak
                    Rec Poster
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 5055

                    #10
                    are these selector switches really a good idea?

                    every big game or scenario ive been to someones always using a high rof that magicly stops when a ref is around.

                    internal airlines, hrrrmm iu wonder if they have their own patent or are using someone elses or feel that it wont be enforced

                    it looks well built as bobs guns usualy are though im worried it looks difficult to work on if need be.

                    i always figured the real scenario guys wanted the durable super mechs, but i guess time will tell if they have the same cravings and shortcomings that have ruined the tourney scene for so many.

                    Comment

                    • B-Pow
                      patented being bad people
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 209

                      #11
                      okay, I'll say it....

                      ugly as sin.


                      I don't like this uber mil-sim crap. I am all about function over form...and the mil-sim crowd is all about crap to throw on a marker to make it look like a real firearm (which is another thing I have problems with). I don't need over stylized milling (a few nice lines is great) and I don't need rails...or sights...or faux magizines. There is a reason I play in the woods with mildly to moderately old "tourney gear" it works and is /designed/ for playing. (I put away the BDUs a while ago for pants with knee pads squeegie pockets and a shirt with ventilation and maybe elbow padding).

                      I don't understand the mil-sim thing, I just have to tolerate it....dosn't mean I have to like it.

                      Comment

                      • Toll
                        Registered User
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 758

                        #12
                        I don't understand going balls out millsim if you're going to have a giant plastic hopper on the top of it and your 45/45 mounted to it.

                        Comment

                        • bunny5
                          lurking
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 1099

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Toll
                          I don't understand going balls out millsim if you're going to have a giant plastic hopper on the top of it and your 45/45 mounted to it.
                          QFT, The gun was looking pretty good until I saw pictures of the tank and hopper on it

                          Comment

                          • J_Kizzy

                            #14
                            That "marker" makes baby Jesus cry.

                            Comment

                            • snoopay700
                              Serious About Men

                              • Jan 2006
                              • 3071

                              #15
                              am i blind, or is that an optic with a feed neck IN THE WAY. Man, you can really tell they took the time out to plan this one out completely.
                              Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

                              Comment

                              Working...