Question about SP patents

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snoopay700
    Serious About Men

    • Jan 2006
    • 3071

    #16
    Ugh, maybe i'll just make one for myself and then make a lesser mech model...
    Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

    Comment

    • questionful
      LNIB
      • Dec 2006
      • 1416

      #17
      Or maybe make an electric model, and sell it without the board?
      Originally posted by custar
      SP claims that by it's copyright enlargement, the patent covers electronic activation of a paintball marker, not just the microswitch per se
      ...
      The shape and/or location of the solenoid doesn't matter. If SP is correct in their interpretation of the 326 patent, a solenoid is not central to their patent; any electronic activation of a paintball marker--solenoid driven or otherwise--would be an infringement.

      custar
      So how come AGD didn't even get a C&D?

      Comment

      • custar
        Registered User
        • Jan 2003
        • 1238

        #18
        Producing a product that will violate a patent but omitting a critical but widely available component is actionable by the patent holder.

        Only SP knows why AGD didn't receive a C&D letter, but it is conjectured SP just hadn't worked the way down their list to reach AGD before AGD decided to climb out of those waters.

        custar

        Comment

        • questionful
          LNIB
          • Dec 2006
          • 1416

          #19
          Maybe you have to sell it with a pneu-frame, but make it so you could easily e-pneu it? Then the board wouldn't be critical.

          Comment

          Working...