Originally posted by punkncat
Stock class players beleive they represent a niche that is supported by a handful of companies that do not matter if the rest fails. We conveniently forget paint that cost $100 a case and was of questionable quality.
Tournament players beleive somehow the sport will support them someday. Not in todays format. Too much is expected for free, and its attempted to be balanced on the back of the other groups.
Rec open players complain that both tournament and stock class players are elitist. Yet some of the negatives of both filter down. I now can plan on watching cheating at rec days, and the elitist attitude.
In the end noone is fostering in the next group of players. Little Johny shows up to play at a "public" day and finds players in full tournament gear playing with full tournament attitude lighting people up. The experienced rec players go off and play by themselves. The stock class players play as hard core to win as the tournament players - they simply are not able to put 15 balls on him in a bunker run. Scenario players just see him as another body at best, and at worst laugh at his gear. What part of the game would make him want to come back?
None of the niches foster in the new player, at least not well. I can remember when I started one of the experienced players shadowed me, showed me the ropes, showed me the tricks. When speedball became the rage many of us when not playing watched and helped instruct each other until we got the tricks down. We have niched ourselves too much, and none of us are doing well at encouraging the four times a year player that the sport needs to grow and prosper. We claim to be doing it in stock class, but we are simply serving our own interests.



Comment