If the kid bought it at a reasonable price from someone who he thinks isn't a shady character, how can you blame him for being "ignorant of the law". I've bought and sold from people I don't know, at very low prices (here even), does that mean there is something fishy with that and we should investigate the origins of whatever is being sold?
To try to say the kid is at fault for paying for something is silly in my opinion, especially with no proof, and from what it looks like, months after the theft occured. As for reciepts and such, few people bother with them, let alone a kid who just wants to play....
Why attack the kid who paid for an item, rather than the kid who stole the item and sold it.
To try to say the kid is at fault for paying for something is silly in my opinion, especially with no proof, and from what it looks like, months after the theft occured. As for reciepts and such, few people bother with them, let alone a kid who just wants to play....
Why attack the kid who paid for an item, rather than the kid who stole the item and sold it.



) it DOES matter that he didn't know it was stolen.

--

You've been making it seem like the kid bought the marker. So... now the dad bought the gun?
Comment