Whats up with PaintBalls?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hunter100
    Registered User
    • Jan 2003
    • 72

    #16
    way to name drop TK in the first post. What makes him qualified to assess the growth and health risks of mold? Yes, he is a smart guy and has done some very interesting research...on dinosaurs. I agree with the other posts above, this looks a lot like marketing hype.
    ----A.H.----

    Comment

    • maniacmechanic
      PrestonCoPaintball
      • Aug 2006
      • 3453

      #17
      Originally posted by hunter100
      way to name drop TK in the first post. What makes him qualified to assess the growth and health risks of mold? Yes, he is a smart guy and has done some very interesting research...on dinosaurs. I agree with the other posts above, this looks a lot like marketing hype.

      Originally Posted by Craig Miller
      An Independent Lab, operated by the legendary Tom Kaye, has already been contacted to conduct these exact tests. Tom has an Electron Microscope - REALLY - and has extensive scientific background and experience in conducting scientific tests in controlled environments, following established science protocols for forensic testing, so I am now 100% confident that the genuine unbiased answers will be forthcoming.

      Comment

      • hunter100
        Registered User
        • Jan 2003
        • 72

        #18
        Originally posted by maniacmechanic
        Originally Posted by Craig Miller
        An Independent Lab, operated by the legendary Tom Kaye, has already been contacted to conduct these exact tests. Tom has an Electron Microscope - REALLY - and has extensive scientific background and experience in conducting scientific tests in controlled environments, following established science protocols for forensic testing, so I am now 100% confident that the genuine unbiased answers will be forthcoming.
        That's terrific, I saw it in the first post too. Please explain to me how this makes TK qualified to assess the health risks of mold to paintball players. A source would be nice too, by the way. And while you're at it, why don't you take explain why an "electron microscope" would be the proper tool used to study fungal growth (its not, by the way, but why bother with facts).
        ----A.H.----

        Comment

        • maniacmechanic
          PrestonCoPaintball
          • Aug 2006
          • 3453

          #19
          Originally posted by hunter100
          That's terrific, I saw it in the first post too. Please explain to me how this makes TK qualified to assess the health risks of mold to paintball players. A source would be nice too, by the way. And while you're at it, why don't you take explain why an "electron microscope" would be the proper tool used to study fungal growth (its not, by the way, but why bother with facts).
          Hey I was just quotin from the OP , sounds like your the smart one , tell us all about it since you seem to know the " facts "

          Comment

          • bound for glory
            retired bootboy
            • Sep 2004
            • 368

            #20
            lohman! wonder where that nuts been?
            and somebody bring back california magnums

            Comment

            • hunter100
              Registered User
              • Jan 2003
              • 72

              #21
              Mold is large enough that it can be studied with optical microscopes which are way cheaper than electron microscopes. And the expiriment doesn't really even need a microscope, you can see mold growing by eye. The fact that the OP desided to throw in the stuff about TK and electron microscopy made me immediately think b.s. A lot of other stuff in the OP is suspicious as well, it does not sound credible.
              ----A.H.----

              Comment

              • Beemer
                I could tell you but then.

                • Oct 2003
                • 3250

                #22
                Originally posted by hunter100
                The fact that the OP desided to throw in the stuff about TK and electron microscopy made me immediately think b.s. A lot of other stuff in the OP is suspicious as well, it does not sound credible.
                I didnt throw in nothing. I just quoted and linked to what I saw on the interwebs AND asked the question. WHATS UP with paintballs?[Thread title] That is all.

                You make youself sound like an expert so tell me [us] whats up.

                Hells survivors made a stand and thefordreport posted it.

                YOU know whats up? If so please elucidate and be explicit.

                You missed my user title didnt you?

                Comment

                • hunter100
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 72

                  #23
                  I think that bunkers get dirty because fields don't take care of them, like many other people have said. The way the quoted text reads, it sounds like the owner of the field has some financial arrangement to sell eco friendly paintballs and is trying to justify high prices with crappy science. Honestly, it wasn't the first quote in the OP that pissed me off, it was the second one about TK's involvement. I simply asked for a source, and it was not provided.

                  A close friend who works at Fermilab, operated by the Obama and and the U.S. Government, has already been contacted to conduct these exact tests. They have a nuclear reactor, - REALLY - and have extensive scientific background and experience in conducting scientific tests in controlled environments, following established science protocols for forensic testing, so I am now 100% confident that the genuine unbiased answers will be forthcoming...right.
                  ----A.H.----

                  Comment

                  Working...