Got a history question about RT foregrip mounts...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spider-TW
    U R techno-literate!

    • Oct 2006
    • 3554

    #1

    Got a history question about RT foregrip mounts...

    Was there any practical reasoning behind the six screw rail bracket for RT Classic and RT Pro foregrip mounts? Are they completely cosmetic?

    The sight rail on those markers has some unique purpose, even if it is mostly cosmetic. However, given the other direct foregrip mounting options, the foregrip mount has always seemed a bit out of place. I now vaguely remember someone moving the mount back or forward one screw; but that doesn't make sense for the Classic RT.

    I'm hoping someone remembers some AGD comments or ads from that period as I can't think of an accurate search for the topic.
  • Cyco-Dude

    #2
    well, it does move the foregrip forward a bit. i've always thought that the classic automag was just a bit cramped with the foregrip right next to the grip frame. i would say the six screws is cosmetic...looks beefier lol.

    Comment

    • Flatliner333
      3X MOTY Winner :P

      • Mar 2009
      • 1286

      #3
      I'm glad there is some forward adjustment when using a Z Grip.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • lordgore66
        Registered User
        • Jul 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Well I think they were trying to create a universal platform that was infinitely upgradeable. I mean 6 air fittings on the rail was a little overkill as well but the "potential" was there. I'm sure they were leaving the door open for other aftermarket companies to build on it as well.

        Comment

        • Dayspring
          aka- The Day Wang

          • May 2001
          • 9664

          #5
          Originally posted by lordgore66 View Post
          Well I think they were trying to create a universal platform that was infinitely upgradeable. I mean 6 air fittings on the rail was a little overkill as well but the "potential" was there. I'm sure they were leaving the door open for other aftermarket companies to build on it as well.
          He's talking about the front grip, not the classic RT in-rail air passage ports.

          Comment

          • lordgore66
            Registered User
            • Jul 2014
            • 4

            #6
            Originally posted by Dayspring View Post
            He's talking about the front grip, not the classic RT in-rail air passage ports.
            My first sentence was referring to the front grip, and then I elaborated in that it was probably put there for the same reason they put the multiple air fittings as well. Sorry it was hard to follow.

            Comment

            • cockerpunk
              Haters Gonna Hate
              • Sep 2004
              • 1383

              #7
              i always thought it was there for adjust-ability. you can move it farther forward, or farther back.

              or you can drill out the mounting holes in the rail and mount it directly.
              "because every vengeful cop with a lesbian daughter, is having a bad day, and looking for someone to blame"

              Comment

              • going_home
                Hebrews 13:8

                • Dec 2004
                • 8343

                #8
                Maybe Tom Kaye will chime in and end all speculation.

                Comment

                • Runamok
                  http://www.automags.org/fo
                  • Oct 2004
                  • 866

                  #9
                  Well from a guy that play'd in those days, the RT had the sight rail(useless except for looks) and the foregrip mount farther forward then the automag. Plus the "holy" body front. The "RT Pro" had the sight rail removed and the body cut down to get rid of the holes. The RT Pro custom was a Ule bodied, long rail w/foregrip mount and the automag style rt valve. I owned all of these. They actually pre dated the shoe box Shocker that you couldn't lube with anything except Dow 33 and had the blazing 10 bps full auto mode, chuckle and and laugh. I only play'd with Mags for 20(?) years, so I've seen almost all of the developments that came round. I never had a hocker but I still have my 1st LED Angel, sn 499 ans she still works except for a leaky o-ring. The end of History class for today. Except for the fact that I bought one of the 1 st RT Pro Custom's at World cup from the AGD booth when TK still ran the company. ULE w/Intelly frame and X-valve. Paid a whopping $360. Wow!
                  I took the road least traveled...now where the hell am I ?

                  Comment

                  • Cyco-Dude

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Runamok View Post
                    Well from a guy that play'd in those days, the RT had the sight rail(useless except for looks) and the foregrip mount farther forward then the automag. Plus the "holy" body front. The "RT Pro" had the sight rail removed and the body cut down to get rid of the holes.
                    you could mount a sight on the sight rail (lol). the rt pro had the stamped stainless foregrip extender and sight rail.

                    Comment

                    • Spider-TW
                      U R techno-literate!

                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3554

                      #11
                      Originally posted by cockerpunk View Post
                      i always thought it was there for adjust-ability. you can move it farther forward, or farther back.
                      But did it not first appear on the Classic RT? With the hardline attached, it is not easy to move.

                      I do vaguely recall Tom making a comment about peripherals on the RT (making it a flexible platform). I just never associated it with the front grip I guess. I've tried to come up with some sort of silliness to hang off of the front of those rails, but it has all been pretty weak so far.

                      Comment

                      • vintage
                        Registered User

                        • Aug 2013
                        • 1787

                        #12
                        Originally posted by going_home View Post
                        Maybe Tom Kaye will chime in and end all speculation.
                        maybe when he gets thru with his fossil searches. last facebook post was from the badlands.

                        Comment

                        • rickenbacker22
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2015
                          • 65

                          #13
                          I wonder if anyone has ever drilled out the slots on the front grip aluminum piece to make it look similar to the sight rail slots ?

                          Comment

                          • blackdeath1k
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2002
                            • 2436

                            #14
                            Originally posted by rickenbacker22 View Post
                            I wonder if anyone has ever drilled out the slots on the front grip aluminum piece to make it look similar to the sight rail slots ?
                            It has crossed my mind. But as of yet I have not done it.

                            Comment

                            • kevdupuis
                              KNDE
                              • May 2002
                              • 1041

                              #15
                              I think 04 was the last year that the Ule pro came with the fore grip extender and sight rail, I actually still have a nib Ule pro from 04, only ever opened it to check the contents.

                              Looking at it the six fore grip screws are for function while the sight rail screws are there to balance the looks.
                              Last edited by kevdupuis; 10-03-2015, 05:59 AM.
                              Flying the unfriendly skies.

                              Comment

                              Working...