GoodBye

[shartley]

Hasty8

[DryIce]

but ah yes good sir
i DO have an unaltered version of the logs
muahaha
and it IS one time!



btw
those rules arent clearly posted for me
seeing as if i dont join using the java chat and join using my OWN irc client.. but yes i agree i should of read them and it is my fault, but it is also clear that i only broke the rules once which should of been a warning OR a kick

so =P

if you want to fix this
it is very easy to make a onjoin message for when people connect to a irc server (message of the day they could also be called) so that no matter what medium you use to connect to the server the rules WILL be posted...


also this is all in good fun for me at the moment because i see myself being a person much like you shartly... a lawyer like person who likes to argue somewhat back and forth

[shartley]

[ThePatriot]

Originally posted by Bluntman
Don't want to sound too hostile, but I think the closing of a thread and the burning of all books is kinda stretching it on the censorship idea.

It didnt start with the burning of books, it started just like this, little parts of people's rights being taken away. Things changing, i doubt we are going to go in reverse with the cencorship ideas, so the only direction is more cencorship....

[Miscue]

ThePatriot. There's all sorts of places on the internet where you can talk about whatever it is that you want to talk about.

You can cry out 'censorship' all you want. Make reference to whatever books you want - you're not the only one who has read them. It is not the same thing.

Can you in the middle of class tell your teacher to go 'take a hike'? But it's a public institution right?

You are misapplying the principles of freedom of speech and have totally displaced its spirit. First of all, this is a privately owned message board... this isn't even publicly owned. And even if it were not... there are still limits to what you can say. You have freedom of speech correct? Then why is slander and libel illegal? It is because there are limitations on your right of speech. (But even this is getting a bit side-tracked from the issue at hand, I'm just making a sub-point)

What you've fallen into is a textbook logically fallacy classified as 'accident'. Basically, it is completely incorrect and should be thrown out of consideration... just like any other fallacy. This is kind of funny, but here is example #1 from my handy-dandy list of logical fallacies:

Category - 'Accident'
1. Freedom of speech is the very heart and soul of democracy. Six-year-old Louie should therefore have perfect freedom to say what he pleases. This follows from your own admission that every member of a democracy should have freedom of speech.

You're trying to make yourself out to be a victim when nobody has done anything to you. My suggestion is to rethink things and get over it. I closed your threads for good reason.

If my decision was unreasonable, then why wouldn't I continue being unreasonable and delete this very thread and ban you? I could if I wanted to. Nobody would know right? Moderators at other forums have done this for much less. Because that's not how we do things here. Everyone is aware of the rules pretty much, you even hinted in your thread that the mods might end up locking it - you knew full well what you were doing and now you act all surprised.

Knock it off.

[Hasty8]

Shartley

Yes, the rules do not that you should be in control of your scripts, however the rules also list the warnings. First offense results in getting kicked from the room. Multiple offenses result in ban.

DryIce should of just gotten kicked.

This is assuming that his side of the story is correct it the script ran only once.

[shartley]

[Miscue]

Originally posted by DryIce
i said it one time
ONE TIME
i checked the logs
i dont see that as annoying, and if you read it, it says BANNED for repeat offenses not one time, im still banned, but i changed my ip so im back in, but infact army did not do his job and maybe he needs a checkup on the rules as well as me
also...... whatever
oh well
im in there now

If anyone should be complaining about being banned, it's me. One of the delaware.net people's glined me for a stupid reason - they made a mistake and thought I was doing something wrong when I did what TK asked to be done. The whole thing was an accident. I kick/banned the admin not knowing that it was even a person - I thought it was a bot with some goofy script that was interfering with TK because he never really said anything that I noticed. I still can't even get in after two days and nobody except delaware.net can release the ban. Grrr.

[shartley]

Miscue
So what exactly are you trying to say? You want a hotdog too?

[Miscue]

/me is hungry now. Off to find food.

[cphilip]

Coney Islands? Man I haven't had one of them in years. We don't got Coneys around here. Used to in FLorida belive it or not. Back in the 70's you got like a dozen of em in a greasy sack for like two bucks! Man! munchie killers a dozen of those are. Used to go by the NCO Club package store and get a case of Bush 16 oz for $5 and then pick up some chicks (remember Sally, Shelly and Nannette?) and swing through a Motel and borrow (steal) ice for the cooler, and then pick up a sack of those and head to the beach for the afternoon. Net cost for a fine day out for 4-6 people? $10 with gas!!!! and Sex was free back then. Ahhhhhh the days!

[DryIce]

ewwww busch

[boss_automager]

Bye Patriot

[Dubstar112]

Trust me, AO is too addicting, he wont be gone for long .. they never leave... (STAY PATRIOT!)

[bunkerhugger]

AO is addicting. I used to be a great systems admin. Now I'm an AO troll. I can't stand this place and it's effect on me. I'm leaving. Well, I'm leaving for as long as it takes the VP to walk past my office. Then I'm coming back.