Originally posted by Vegeta
Sam, my suuggestion is to just go with what he says. It is true. I have talked to him on more than one account and he knows what he is doing.
Sam, my suuggestion is to just go with what he says. It is true. I have talked to him on more than one account and he knows what he is doing.
It is not a matter of me believing him or not. It is that IF I was to just say, "Yeah, he knows what he is talking about, so it must be true." I would be going against everything AO stands for... which is SHOW ME PROOF. We don't even let Tom come on AO and post stuff without showing proof (and it is HIS forum. LOL). Why should we let anyone else?
Trust me, if Tom himself had posted the same stuff, I (and others) would have done and said the same thing. All I wanted is for him to post something that would hold up to even the lightest of skepticism. But after each arguing point, all that could really be said was "You either believe me, or you don't. And some people will just never believe." And that is just WRONG. That was NOT what the deal was.
It was not about people believing... it was about posting proof. It is easier however, to make those asking questions and wanting proof look bad, than to provide proof sometimes. And we all know the path of least resistance is the one most often traveled.
We are beating a dead horse here... LOL It is not about me believing or not believing, it is about him not posting proof. One has NOTHING to do with the other.
Comment