whats up with this??

[cphilip]

I saw nothing wrong with the charge at all. Seemed reasonable to me. Some of them did have a problem with it but then some of the "Management" were trying to attribute the whole story to us as if it was Ao Angel Bashing when indeed it was never even discussed here was what we were responding too. They pulled that out of thin air! And I also defended and attack on our own Angel Forum were they implied some things that needed a straightening out. And that they didn't want to see on their site as it challenges them to even have it mentioned there is another one... You get the gist. They are sorry it even was discoverd and want it to go away is all.

[ntn4502]

oh well, our site's better anyway

[dansim]

WOW thats a mature comment

[Wc Keep]

two parts to my comment.

1. phil dont worry cause when you get bill and dawn to come back to another ao day and post it again on warpig theyll be kicking themselves for not having accepted your invite. ao will grow far bigger than aog because not everyone knows about these forums but a lot more people know about warpig.

2. what was this $25 charge for? i didnt get a chance to read the thread

[vf-xx]

Uh oh, what are they charging Brad with now? I've heard rumors of some bad things from him, but i've never had anything but good service from him and that store.

[cphilip]

It was a tech charge at IAO to look at SOME Angels markers. Not all. It sounds fair to me.

Vf I have no idea what you are talking about. The guy said he heard his story from Brad. Thats all. Brad may or may not have even talked to the guy and they guy may have mixed up some of his facts. There was indeed an IR3 traded for an Extreme at IAO. I believe it was Sprayingmango who did that. And the exact facts as to why I am not certian. But this sounds similar to the story this fellow was relating. Perhaps some of the particulars were distorted or I just have not heard all of them.

How they could have interpreted that as AO bashing them I realy do not know. its never been discussed here in that way. In fact it was the Admin of the site that intialy tried to claim that was the case.

You see, part of the story was an Angel owner getting mad about it and trading it on a Emag. And that seemed to bring out the "AO must have started this" comments. Nothing could be further from the truth even if the story is true. The author of the thread attributed the story to Brad. That was the only connection. So after the "Admin" tried to make that connection to AO I felt compelled to challenge that. That was all "hear say" and I went on to tell them at no time had anyone here ever even discussed that and some of their comments were rather childish. And then poof !!! they make it all disapear and still even now there seems to be rearranging some of the facts on how the rest transpired.

I was denied Forum access for a time and the sequence of events has been rearranged in a locked post. No problem....leave it alone is what I intend to do. However I did have one more email to Jason over the sequence of events and as far as I am concerned it's finished.

Trust me there was no Angel vs. Mag issue from this direction. It was the other way around that I was trying to dispell. In fact they intitated an attack on our Angel forum as well that I went on to defend and challenge.

End of story.

[vf-xx]

Do they not realize that we have an angel forum over here?

Geeze. Oh well. I'll ask brad about it sometime.

[Dayspring]

Mentioning that is what got me banned from viewing the forums over there. Nice huh? And people wonder why we like AGD.

[ntn4502]

Dansin, know some sarcasim when you see it, everybody was responding with hugh paragraphs, and I threw in a one liner.