IMHO, the warp breech design could be better...
Most mounting configurations of the warp have the feeding tube running vertically up to the breech. The current design of the breech has the feeding tube running almost horizontal. This requires the use of a 90 degree elbow. If you don't use a 90 elbow, you will have to cut or melt your hopper in order to get it as tight and compact as possible.
I think the XMAG warp breech should have a built-in 'elbow' pointing straight down with a minimal but gentle curve so that the feed tube can slip straight up into the breech with no curves or bends.
Since AGD makes both the warp and the XMAG, knowing exactly where all the components line up should not be a problem.
Please consider the idea of redesigning the warp breech to include a small and short bend so that we don't have to cut or melt our hoppers.
Thanks.
Most mounting configurations of the warp have the feeding tube running vertically up to the breech. The current design of the breech has the feeding tube running almost horizontal. This requires the use of a 90 degree elbow. If you don't use a 90 elbow, you will have to cut or melt your hopper in order to get it as tight and compact as possible.
I think the XMAG warp breech should have a built-in 'elbow' pointing straight down with a minimal but gentle curve so that the feed tube can slip straight up into the breech with no curves or bends.
Since AGD makes both the warp and the XMAG, knowing exactly where all the components line up should not be a problem.
Please consider the idea of redesigning the warp breech to include a small and short bend so that we don't have to cut or melt our hoppers.
Thanks.



Comment