RT vs RT Pro

[Brak]

im thinking of getting an automag RT, i love how it looks and haven't heard anything bad about it. my question is what is the difference between the RT and RT pro? also, if you own a RT, do you like it? and if i DO buy one, what should i get for it?

[petefol]

the rt had a smaller valve that fit inside the body, and the rtp comes with an iframe. because the rt valve is smaller you cant put any different bodies on the rt, and trigger frames made for normal mags wont fit on the rt's rail.

[wimag]

love my RT so much that i bought a secind one as a backup

if the RT is in good shape i would say about 325 to 350

[Brak]

can i get an I-frame for an RT?

[wimag]

yes you can get an i-frame for a old school RT. If you order through AGD it may take a little longer; have to drill the field strip screw hole bigger for the banjo bolt.
Not sure if any on-line sites have them as of now, When i ordered mine it was through modified paintball and it took a while due to it being a special order at that time. Who knows maybe they have em in stock now.

[boomerfoxtrot]

well..

the old skol RT is faster... *trigger bounch is harder*
but the down side is... ONLY the stuff made for the Old Skol RT will fit... (the hole for the field strip screw is larger then that of the pro)

the RT Pro.. well, the upside it has to the old skol is that everything else fits... (if it fits mag)
the down side is.. you don't get near the trigger bounch as you do with the Old Skol RT ...

I own an Old Skol RT .... and I owned a Pro... I still own the old skol rt... if that tells you anything =]

[Butterfingers]

thats a fallacy

the rt and RTP and retro equiped mags are identical in function and reactivity given comparable tolerances

[GWTC]

Sorry butterfingers, but it isn't at all false. Tom said so himself that the RT valve is faster than the Retro Valve!

[shartley]

Originally posted by Butterfingers
thats a fallacy

the rt and RTP and retro equiped mags are identical in function and reactivity given comparable tolerances

Thank you...

[shartley]

Originally posted by GWTC
Sorry butterfingers, but it isn't at all false. Tom said so himself that the RT valve is faster than the Retro Valve!

How fast the valve is, is not the only thing that determines Reactiveness..... one is speed of the valve and its recharge rate, and the other is trigger returning speed and pressure caused by input pressure... not the speed of the valve..... unless I am understanding the process wrong.

[petefol]

why would AGD design the retro valve to perform less then the rt?

[shartley]

Originally posted by petefol
why would AGD design the retro valve to perform less then the rt?

I think maybe folks are mixing things up a bit.... I will have to look into this more.....

[wimag]

Originally posted by GWTC
Sorry butterfingers, but it isn't at all false. Tom said so himself that the RT valve is faster than the Retro Valve!

please provide this info in more detail, such as when and where before this thread turns into another hijacked pissing match.


BRak: good luck on your search for an RT.

[petefol]

i wasnt saying that it was true, im saying that i dont think AGD would have released the retro valve if they new it didnt perform as well as the rt. as for finding one, i heard 888paintball has some, but their upgrading their site.

[DutchNut]

thwey both suck angels own