Left to right:EMag,SFL,Angel,Shocker?
Name the Markers in this Pic.
Collapse
X
-
sfl(extreme has more site rail), emag(vert feed), angel, impulse. the last one is definatley an impulse.AO #765
CCM Series 5
Prerelease Impulse
Hyperframed Warped Mag w/flatline tank
Feedback.
Good to know that somone of Tom's status seeks "relief" from a sport he helped create. A sport now ruled by a single patent.Comment
-
question
Question?
If the second from left is an emag, where is the air fitting?
I vote it is an older RT with the newer body. That explains
the lack of an air fitting on the side of the valve since it
takes air through the rail.
I don't know that the emags were ever built this way. Correct me
if I'm wrong, I'm sure they will :-)
-robComment
-
-
I just took a second look and I remeber seeing the solar system/galaxy emag. A picture or a link is floating around on the forum. One reason I said it was an old school RT was that there was no elbow on the valve leading me to believe to that. Good eye ah137.Originally posted by ah137Comment
-
Damn, imps are REALLY tall.Your Mother is a Slot
[url]www.Paint-BallAction.com[/url
www.TheAngelGuy.com
www.Angel-Owners.com[/color]Comment
-
i just thought it was funny that some thought 3rd from right was a classic RT valve.
if you knw anything about classic RT's, you'd know that the OD of all AGD markers' bodies hasnt changed at all. that would mean that the valve is a smaller OD than an RTP, so that means if it were a classic RT, the newer body would have to extend the length of the valve. so then it would have to be a custom body, as a one-time thing. knowing Tom, i know he wouldn't spend the extra time and money "just to see how it looks", or just to display it.:)Comment
-
english?
Would someone put his snide remarks into english?
I suspect this picture was taken when Tom was demonstrating that
even with a highrise the emag was no taller than an Angel.
If I remember, some of the older RT's had stamped metal sight rails
that one is obviously aluminum. As far as fittings, since there
is not an air fitting on the marker in question, that led me
to think it could be an RT.
Voicing opinions and educated guesses is one thing. If you
want to flame or be an ***, please go to one of the other
online forums, there are plenty where that is the prevailing
attitude.
-robComment
-
Jason, remember back to the 2001 Iao. Tom explained how that marker came to be. I think manike had alot to do with it. the barrel has since ben canibalized, and used in the teflon ball tester
the marker is truely chromed in the trigger frame and rail etc
Altho, i remember it as an e-mag... i am not quite sure, tom switches stuff up some times.
im pretty damn sure it is an e-mag
Originally posted by Tom in reffrence to a post saying he acted like my dad...
"That's right!
WHO'S YOUR DADDY!!"
ALL QUIT AND NO GO!!! Team Icky Forest-Shatnerball 2003!!!
www.tunamart.com
DONT SUPPORT HYPOCRITICAL MISSLEAD YOUTH, BOYCOTT HK
Comment
-
-
gah, look at the color of the frame on the emag/rt(pro or not i dont care.). Its nickle plated! which means that its more than likeley an rt with intelliframe. THe site rail issue, its not hard to screw an emag site rail on an rt pro, or if it was an old school rt they came with those site rails.AO #765
CCM Series 5
Prerelease Impulse
Hyperframed Warped Mag w/flatline tank
Feedback.
Good to know that somone of Tom's status seeks "relief" from a sport he helped create. A sport now ruled by a single patent.Comment



Comment