I am curious why paintball technology hasn't done major leaps?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hostage
    Boo-yaah/Mako Fixer
    • Aug 2001
    • 1529

    #1

    I am curious why paintball technology hasn't done major leaps?

    I am at college and I am awed by the ammount of knowledge that some of my peers have in their fields. At RIT we have Electronic, Micro, Computer, Software, Civil, Mechanical, and Airontical Engineers, as well as Computer majors such as IT (me), CS, MIS, and a few others. With all that knowledge I would like to research new ideas and test them out with the proper equipement. That is another thing we have, not only knowledge, but also the Equipment/Machinery to do a project. The issue is guidence, we lack it. I just want us to get together and do a project, thinktank. Look how little has changed in paintball. You have the automag, same concept that has been improved and changed very little from the orignal Automag 68. You have pumps and pumps that were converted into semis (cockers). Lastly you have the Spyder clones and the types that function much like them.

    Anyway, so there is this massive useless thinktank that is just sitting next to the machinery that should be used. The majority of us have to come up with stupid useless excuses, (I know since I can be like one of them), on how we need to do all of this and have no money to play pb or what not. Well here is the question, how many scientists and engineers do many paintball realted companies have as well as the machinery? Wouldn't it make sense for companies to sponser or outsource to knowledgable people that can directly improve there product for very little costs of their own products? I'm in a club of ill motivated paintball players, I want to work on projects such as this, but since there is no gain for anyone to do this. They end up spending their time flipping burgers to play this expensive sport, since they lack the capital. Though if they got an offer for free paint and to get their name reconized for revolutinizing the sport.

    Well to end this story, we all get a good offer from some ABC company, graduate, and history repeats itself.

    Well what are yalls opinions on this concept? Jeeze I think I kind of gave myself an awnser.
    -Doron
    ---X-Mag'n spending the G's.---


    My feedback
  • demonguy8
    Jobless and Poor.
    • Jun 2002
    • 501

    #2
    I think its quite simple there really isnt much that can be easily improved upon, or maybe its too cost prohibitive to go down such roads (weve had the technology to have electric driven cars for YEARS but for those to work they would to change gas stations, modify homes, and possibly even mobile plugs (which would either need to be manned, effectivly making them electric gas stations,or have some form of universal currency card like a social security deposit credit card thing) hmm maybe this isnt really the simple answer id intended it to be...

    On the other side of the coin...there have been enourmous improvements to the paintball industry.. Selonoids, magnetic triggers, photoeyes, computer chips, 5kairfills,heck 4.5k fills,or even 3k airfills! Not even counting the ways that paint production has improved/ made less costly to produce (altho the players arent seeing any real drop in price ) These are HUGE advances for our sport technilogically speaking..

    and since i have two completely different answers, Ill draw both paragraphs together with a comparison(considering my real answer is a combination of both paragraphs).. LOOK at the automotive industry! When you boil it all down everyone is still using a combustion powered engine.. sure they may have transmissions and turbos and some even have electronic assistance (the hybrid cars) but thats like using a board to limit bps, hair triggers, Or increasing the markers efficiancy by redesigning a reg. The auto industry has been around for 100 years and is STILL on the same BASIC sytem that they started with and they are probly a1000x larger market!
    so to sum it up there are countless breakthroughs but to do someting completely different can be to cost prohibitive to bother with so we just remake what we already got a little bit better...

    Edit: i should prolly add id been up for about 23 hours when i wrote this
    "Nothing is more beutiful than a warrior with no distractions".

    Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.

    Comment

    • Doc Nickel
      Unrepentant Gadget freak

      • Jul 2001
      • 499

      #3
      It's quite simple: First off, technology in this sport has grown by leaps and bounds. True, we haven't pulled an Intel and quintupled processor speed in eighteen months, but then, neither do we have a forty billion dollar indistry driving a $500 million/year company.

      Consider that our sport has grown from ten-shot, 12-gram powered bolt action pistols to programmable electronically fired force-fed markers powered by 4,000 psi compressed air, in only twenty years.

      The price of paint has plummetted ($40 a case of 2,000 vs. $2 a tube of ten?) the cost of playing has dropped, there's fields everywhere, and you can get a decent semiauto for under a hundred bucks. (The 68 Special, when it first came out, was $400, over ten years ago.)

      We now have computerized markers, infrared programmability, in-breech anti-chop sensors and a whole host of programmable fire modes.

      Why haven't we gone further? Simple- Point Number Two: we deliberately, artifically limit gun performance.

      In racing, whether cars, motorcycles or horses, the idea is always to go faster. Engines are tuned for more horsepower to make more top end speed.

      However, in paintball, we have a maximum playing limit of 300 fps. Meaning that no matter what you do to the gun, if you want to use it, you have to keep it under that speed. So things like valve porting, flow rates and other factors, if adequate for the marker as is, don't need to be changed.

      Also, most governing bodies for the sport restrict anything but semiautomatic fire modes. Yes, we have full-auto modes, and people with the right setup can get wild rates of fire, but for the most part, a great many players are limited to however fast they can pull the trigger manually. (Which runs around eight to thirteen shots per second, with a sustainable average being around nine or ten.)

      So consequently, for the most part, other than playing around in the backyard, we're limited to a fixed muzzle velocity, and a certain ballpark rate of fire.

      With the latest electronic markers, we're already chock full of features that few users will actually use. Digital temperature readouts? Programmable text messages on startup? Do things like this really help anyone's game? No, they're trinkets- shiny bits to attract buyers.

      Which is where we are now- The gun has long since surpassed the player in possible ROF, paint really isn't gonna get any rounder, barrels have been as good as they're gonna get since about '95 or so (the only thing a multi-part barrel gains is the adjustable bore) and airsystems are pretty much at their peak already, with +/- 1fps capabilities. So the only real improvements are cosmetic (milling and anno) and ergonomic (different shape grips, various drop-forwards) and pure, useless fluff (the aforementioned temperature readouts and text messages.)

      So we're in the same stage as the cell phones. Coverage is everywhere, everyone has one, they're clear as a bell and batteries last for days. So the only real improvements they make are trinkets- custom ring tones, color screens, snap-on covers.

      Doc.

      Comment

      • Top Secret
        IPR's E-Maggot
        • Jun 2001
        • 601

        #4
        Major leaps? Look at us compared to the firearms industry. Hasn't been much for innovation the since the 60's. Guns have been around for over 400 years. We went from a flintlock to a OICW in about 20 years in the paintball industry.
        O FLAGPULL O

        Cincinnati All-Stars

        Comment

        • Miscue
          Super Moderator

          • Oct 2000
          • 7105

          #5
          They're pretty much at the point where all that's left to work on is figuring out how to lower manufacturing costs.

          Big innovation in paintball in the future probably won't have much to do with the actual markers... but other paintball related stuff.

          Comment

          • FutureMagOwner
            Registered User
            • Dec 2001
            • 3354

            #6
            i suppose it all depends on what you consider a leap i consider that agd makes a valve that doesnt have shootdown in upwards of currently unreachable speeds i think thats a large one its dinner time so im not gunna give any more examples for now but i hope you understand my point

            Comment

            • TigerMan
              Meeoooow!
              • Jan 2002
              • 1100

              #7
              I think Doc hit the nail on the head, he pretty much summed up everything and how far we have come in such little time.

              Then again though, if you think about it you'd think we'd have nothing to improve on, but in reality there is things that can be improved the idea just hasn't been thought. Like for you older players, how many of you ever though there be a thing such an electronic paintball gun? It's just a matter of the idea being thought then being made. Who knows what will be next, maybe something like a new design paintball holding system, or maybe new ways to power the markers.

              Like all things, it just takes time, and of course the technology. Like you hear many people in different fields say. "Oh we would have done that sooner, it's just the technology wasn't there." So with time, new ideas may become reality. But for such a short period that this sport has been around, we HAVE made huge leaps and bounds.
              Silver ULE X Valved Mag
              Spyder AMG Classic
              ------------------------


              Lots FS/FT! Barrels, pack, hopper and more! Click Here!

              Comment

              • Darkstorm
                Texas Ranger
                • Aug 2002
                • 313

                #8
                If you aren't just talking

                Hostage,
                If you have people that are serious....I can give a number of ideas to you that would be cool to work on. Some might be able to get funded, one or two I would cut a deal with you on, others are just fun. Don't think just about the gun.

                We can step over to deep blue if AGD doesn't mind us talking about some really weird stuff over there. I don't have the time to actually do this cool stuff any more, so if you want to, I'll give you whatever concept I have.

                ---------------------------------------------------------

                Or you could just invent a way to get more women to play and you would be a GOD in the paintball community.

                Comment

                • AGD
                  The man from AGD

                  • Oct 2000
                  • 5916

                  #9
                  The reason why paintball technology is not progressing as fast as you think is should is only because of YOU the painball public!

                  Most players want to use what Chris Lasoya uses NOT whats new and "different". Todays players have an idea of what a "paintball player" looks like and if they don't buy stuff that looks like that they feel stupid.

                  Camo is not cool right?
                  Pros don't use warps right?
                  You pay extra for DYE stuff right?

                  If it as all about technology I wouldn't have to be here every day asking you what to do next.

                  AGD
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Remington
                    AGD E-mag Faithful
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 1671

                    #10
                    I don't know what everyone else is like but I for one am very conscientious about what I spend my money on. Tom, I would only buy DYE clothing if I know it would hold up to the rigors of tournament style play, just like I buy AGD equipment because I know that it does stand up to tournament play. I know AGD has down lots of testing to make its equipment better, as well as help improve the sport of paintball in general. What I don't understand is why other paintball manufacturing companies don't follow suit. If everyone made their products as well as AGD makes its products, I for one believe that the sport of paintball could have the chance of going mainstream. The problem that is keeping paintball from going in that direction is the lack of product testing by a lot of manufacturers. I buy paint from RPS, markers from AGD, hoppers from Richochet(company name?), and tanks from Crossfire because I know all these companies put a lot of time, money, and effort into testing their products and by doing so help make their products the very best they can be, for the lowest price possible. Sorry for making that so long. Just my 2 cents.

                    My Feedback

                    TunaMart

                    TheMagSmith

                    Mint Paintball

                    Comment

                    • Nitroduck
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 726

                      #11
                      Im wondering what rock you are under so I can come tip that rock over and show you the progress the paintball industry has made in 10 years...

                      Lets look at 92 to 2002


                      You had Mags that costed about $800, fired 9bps, the hopper could only keep up with the gun barely, Nitrogen was rare and cost $400 for a 2.5k nitrogen system. Paint costed about $80-$100 a case, quite a few people were still using JT Whippersnapper masks, harness were very crappy (one of the videos I have shows a guy using something that resembles toilet paper tubes that were hauling paint, shakin and bouncing everywhere), playing in woods with very little man-made bunkers.

                      We now have Mags that cost $300, preform better than their counterparts of 92, hoppers can keep up with the insane rates of fire, Nitrogen systems cost $200 for a tank thats nearly twice as large, paint goes for $50 no problem for paint of superior quality versus the paint from 92, we have masks that change color, ambered, chromed, vented, ported masks that look like your some sort of invader from a distant galaxy, harnesses that can hold more than a case of paint (which the tubes are chromed, to reflect heat from melting the paint), playing on man-made fields SPECIFICALLY for the paintball industry in stadiums.

                      Paintball might not be moving as fast as the computer industry, but gosh darnit, we're moving faster than nearly every other industry.
                      Former stickballmovies guy (They're on youtube now). Now a full-time slumlord in Central Ohio.

                      Comment

                      • halB
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 953

                        #12
                        its because it costs too much money for me to get a damn patent, but if u wanna buy a patent for me, ill increase paintball trigger technology 2X ooooooo yaaaaaa

                        also, the main reason is image.

                        players dont really care about performance, all they care about is image and style. also, every time that a new invention comes out, its met with severe resistance from the players. think of C/A. players stuck with 12g until AGD ironically killed 12g with their 6 pak change-o-matic thingy. they resisted c/a, claiming it would end the spirit of the game, and the tourney scene was stricly 12g. but agd changed that

                        then again, there was resistance with the RT valve, sure it was only banned in some tournies for a short time. but it was still resisted.

                        plus, where else do we have to go? we're going to be reaching the limit soon on rof where balls cant be fed that fast without breaking, and the human finger can still only fire 10 bps constantly. plus the re-emergence of stock class shows players growing dissatisfaction with spray and pray.

                        plus, the biggest thing, we're not really sponsored. i think the biggest thing we can do is get sponsored by ar eal company, like, ugh, nike, but thats not gonna happen until we clean up our sport, stop the cheating and cursing, and develop a version of paintball thats damn friendly to paintball.

                        Comment

                        • FalconGuy016
                          Divine Right, Pevs @ AG
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 6127

                          #13
                          Some of you really sound like you just based your reply off the title, and not the actual post
                          Hey
                          AIM: FalconGuy016
                          BANG!!!

                          Comment

                          • Hornet
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 74

                            #14
                            well what would the new technology do? anti-chop, auto etc are alrdy out i mean what do u want? only thing i think what would be cool is a in-gun chrono or a LCD tunner for your reg thats it :/

                            Comment

                            • FooTemps
                              HURRRR
                              • Sep 2001
                              • 6702

                              #15
                              i wish they could make their warps as cheap as revies... I wish they could make warps smaller too... Then I bet even more people would buy them. They'd be smaller, most of a chance lighter, and cheaper (which means their more convinient for people). I also wish AGD creates a super ergonomic (sp?) gripframe.

                              .
                              Good Traders:
                              Tunaman, K-villeplayer, Magman007, Mastersconi, Jon/xpm, Kenndogg

                              My feedback if you've dealt with me, leave some...

                              Fruitcat: it's what AO doesn't like.

                              Comment

                              Working...