I begin this question with no intention of bashing AGD....I love the company, there's no way I'd turn my back on it.
But I do want to know...Why is there so much hype surrounding the X-mags? I have certainly seen a lot of news about them lately, and have been following news about these new markers since they were announced. I must admit they are sweet looking markers as well, and that's good for AGD, finally meeting the demand for sexy looking markers.
When Tom was in California, I was privileged to behold his warped X-mag. It sure was light, fast, and sexy. He even let us rip up the shop with compressed air. I was impressed, but also dissapointed. After shooting it, I then beheld my own ULE emag, and I really didn't notice a big difference.
The only advantage that I can think of that would make it better than a standard emag would be the ACE. That in combination with an LX kit, you can be assured that you won't chop paint. But then again, with a well-tuned LX kit in itself is also capable. And that brings me to say...well sure, there's nothing wrong with double protection, LX + ACE will prevent breakage, and that does have an advantage over plain LX. But given the choice, I'd rather have the gun hiss and indicate there was a misfire, than just not shoot at all.
So I guess the X-mag isn't, for me anyway, worth the price. And the only reason why I can come up with that makes others want to buy such a sweet marker would be the "new and captivating" aspect surrounding new and exciting products. Plus it does look sexy.
Schnitzel
But I do want to know...Why is there so much hype surrounding the X-mags? I have certainly seen a lot of news about them lately, and have been following news about these new markers since they were announced. I must admit they are sweet looking markers as well, and that's good for AGD, finally meeting the demand for sexy looking markers.
When Tom was in California, I was privileged to behold his warped X-mag. It sure was light, fast, and sexy. He even let us rip up the shop with compressed air. I was impressed, but also dissapointed. After shooting it, I then beheld my own ULE emag, and I really didn't notice a big difference.
The only advantage that I can think of that would make it better than a standard emag would be the ACE. That in combination with an LX kit, you can be assured that you won't chop paint. But then again, with a well-tuned LX kit in itself is also capable. And that brings me to say...well sure, there's nothing wrong with double protection, LX + ACE will prevent breakage, and that does have an advantage over plain LX. But given the choice, I'd rather have the gun hiss and indicate there was a misfire, than just not shoot at all.
So I guess the X-mag isn't, for me anyway, worth the price. And the only reason why I can come up with that makes others want to buy such a sweet marker would be the "new and captivating" aspect surrounding new and exciting products. Plus it does look sexy.
Schnitzel





Comment