EMag...Viking...hmmm Choices

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lack of grace
    Words fall like bricks
    • Feb 2003
    • 240

    #31
    Originally posted by ~WarpedRT#2~
    If your goign to look at AKA, why not look at the Excalibur? I'd take one of those over a Viking.
    They cost several hundred more and are the same thing, just closed bolt.

    Comment

    • Derman2k
      MSG Regulators
      • Oct 2002
      • 896

      #32
      Originally posted by ~WarpedRT#2~
      If your goign to look at AKA, why not look at the Excalibur? I'd take one of those over a Viking.
      I don't really feel like spending $1000 on a gun when I'm not even playing amateur yet...
      My feedback...
      http://www.automags.org/forums/showt...threadid=59553

      Comment

      • headcase
        Gotta Love Toys
        • Nov 2001
        • 1141

        #33
        Originally posted by ~WarpedRT#2~
        If your goign to look at AKA, why not look at the Excalibur? I'd take one of those over a Viking.
        Why?

        I've owed both an Excal and a Viking, and three E-mags(Mircro, W/L, X). There are no noticable differences between the Viking and Excal during play. The Excal might be a little more efficient. But at the almost 500 dollar difference between the two, I don't think it is worth the money. So unless you beleve in close bolt gnomes, I can't think of any reason to get an Excal over a Viking.

        As far as Viking vs. E-mag I really enjoyed both. I perfer the trigger on the E-mag, but other than that they are both very similar.

        Put it this way, a Viking_+cash) is the only thing I can imagine trading my X-mag for
        2003 SuperBowl Champions!, THE New England Patriots!

        He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
        My Feedback

        Comment

        • lack of grace
          Words fall like bricks
          • Feb 2003
          • 240

          #34
          Originally posted by headcase

          As far as Viking vs. E-mag I really enjoyed both. I perfer the trigger on the E-mag, but other than that they are both very similar.
          Emag and viking triggers are nothing alike imo.

          Comment

          • headcase
            Gotta Love Toys
            • Nov 2001
            • 1141

            #35
            That came out wrong.

            Besides the trigger, they are both similar.

            Fairly Light
            Both Basicly Bulletproof
            Both have good companies behind them.

            The E-mag is smaller(shorter)
            The Viking is more efficient
            2003 SuperBowl Champions!, THE New England Patriots!

            He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
            My Feedback

            Comment

            • zabbu
              Bunkermonkey Hunter
              • Mar 2003
              • 94

              #36
              Excal = SLOW

              the excal is slow compared to the viking or the emag.
              I personaly prefer the viking over the emag.
              I found the marker to shoot a little better than the emag, but i must stress that is MY opinion, not the scientific crap. I lowered the pressure on my viking and found that i could play all day with out a single paint break. i did not have eyes or even a halo. i was shooting approx 15-18 bps.
              On an 88/45 i could play for GAMES as a back player shooting 6-8 pods.
              just my 2cp worth
              brandon
              Proud owner of a 98 Eclipse cocker with Eblade, and soon to be warped!
              If you get bored AIM ME!
              zabbux

              Comment

              Working...