Why cant it be done???

[RRfireblade]

Well.

Since I don't have an Emag

I have an XMAG

Except it's still laying in parts on a table at AGD

What is the total length of the Mag/Adj assembly?

I think my 5 second trigger job should enclose most,if not all of it.Even if a tiny bit stuck out I'd be cool with that,it's not like a Mag doesn't usually have a trigger rod sticking out back anyway.

Jay.

P.S.
Look how far Mags have come,we used to say "sure it's ugly but I'm all about performance." Now we even want the triggers to be sexy.

[punkcmonkiez]

heres what i ment in my previous post, you would make a bump out on the back of the trigger to put the magnet in this would make up for the space lost by the front grove being gone. now this would mean that the trigger itself woulf have to be moved slightly forward so he gun would work in mechanical mode and the trigger could travel all the way back. i dont know if this would work but its an idea

[iownamag]

I think your on to something... but I believe you would need another hump on the trigger where the sear would hit the trigger in mechanical mode, so basically you are filling in the grooves of the stock trigger, then cutting out the parts in the back of the trigger not needed to hold the magnet or come in conact with the sear... hmmm, this would be touchy tho and so it'd probably take agd a really long time to develope since they would want to make it perfect. Why not just stick with the tl63? and not use mechanical mode?

[RRfireblade]

Originally posted by iownamag
this would be touchy tho and so it'd probably take agd a really long time to develope since they would want to make it perfect. Why not just stick with the tl63? and not use mechanical mode?

No Mech=No hybrid=Bite your tounge sir.

I don't really think it's that complicated really.You just couldn't make it as thin as a TL63.

It should be this easy........

Jay.

[iownamag]

point taken on the hybrid comment, but I still think that bumps in the back would work better, because in your plan that is pushin it a little close to the set screw thing for the magnet in the hump. And it's plenty complicated enough, or else agd would have a solution already. Is the tl63 made by agd? I don't know much about them at all.

[punkcmonkiez]

no the tl63 was not made by agd...now rrfireblade the only thing is that yours still cuts off the bump in the middle s little bit... and from what i understand you need all that space in order to have the screw so you have to compinsate for space lost by removing the bump

[RRfireblade]

I don't think you need all of it(hump).I remember the svrew on mine being a little ways down in there.You might just give up a tad of adjustment or have a tiny bit of magnet stick out the back.

Jay.

[athomas]

Here's the one I was talking about:





I like it.


You can't have just a hump on the back. The magnet has to be encased on the back, plus the back of the trigger also has to be in the proper location to properly engage the trigger rod. So, the back of the trigger must be placed/designed first. Then the ergonomics and funtionality of the front side must be done last.

[manike]

That's EXACTLY the same trigger as in my picture, just after John cut the back a bit more.

[athomas]

Here is a modified version with a slope to the back:

[Muzikman]

Hmm..not to get off the topic...but is that an on/off switch in the front?

[manike]

Originally posted by Muzikman
Hmm..not to get off the topic...but is that an on/off switch in the front?

Yes.

[DJBacon06]

i love the looks of the first trigger!


...i really wish i had an e-mag so i could know what the jesus is going on...

[punkcmonkiez]

i dont think that first trigger on the tequila fade is really all that bad myself.. with slight modifycation it could look pretty nice

[Muzikman]

Better have some big hangs to reach that trigger