Whats the difference btw Macrolines and Microlines??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steelrat
    I meant to...uh, nevermind
    • May 2003
    • 5375

    #16
    Remember, there are different types of Macro. My Parker stuff looks nice and thick. I had some 32 degrees stuff that had a very thin wall in comparison to the parker.

    I've only seen macro blow one. There was a loud explosion, followed by a quick venting of gas. It scared the crap out of all of us, and apparently did a nice job of chilling the leg of the girl who wsa holding the gun. She had been holding the gun at her side, and the air all hit her leg. The line did not go spinning though, as the line just burst, as opposed to actually blowing in half.


    A site for gay and alternative lifestyles: www.zakvetter.com

    Comment

    • ZAust
      the righteous, the weeping
      • May 2003
      • 1806

      #17
      no, ryan, incorrect. i used micro. i am now a happy macroliner.
      TONIGHT WE DANCE FOR TOMORROW THEY RELEASE THE DOGS

      Comment

      • Steelrat
        I meant to...uh, nevermind
        • May 2003
        • 5375

        #18
        Oh, I didnt know that you had switched out for macro. Good call. Hopefully its good macro. Too bad I wont get to see your reworked gun for a while, if ever...


        A site for gay and alternative lifestyles: www.zakvetter.com

        Comment

        • FalconGuy016
          Divine Right, Pevs @ AG
          • Aug 2002
          • 6127

          #19
          A lot of people complain about macro leaking, exploding, and a bunch of other things. Thats because they most likely bought the first macro line and fittings they found, not knowing about them. Usually, that would be 32* stuff, cause they are abundant and cheap for dealers. 32 DEGREES SUCK AND ARE UNSAFE! They are extremely thin and inconsistant walls (inconsistant walls are what are dangerous for exploding) and the fittings are poor quality (leaks, and it doesnt help that the macro isnt even). Get QUALITY MACRO, GET QUALITY FITTINGS, it will never leak and you get all the conviences of macro. Extremely flexible, my macro twists OVER my mainbody into the vertical adaptor. Not only that, my macro is 3 years old and still doesnt leak. You can cut it to any length, the swivel fittings are convienent, and of course you can disconnect it extremely fast. Its not bulky either, and it looks nice

          There is a pic somewhere on the forums showing the walls of good macro and 32* (or just any bad macro)
          Hey
          AIM: FalconGuy016
          BANG!!!

          Comment

          • madmatt151
            Registered User
            • Oct 2002
            • 764

            #20
            Agreed macro s good. But I did use micro for a long time on my first Mag, and it worked flawlessly. If you look ar specs you will see the working pressures and max pressures for each line you use. Even Parker has a working pressure of only 500 psi. Since I am running my 800 psi preset tank through it, I am probably not too smart. The micro I was using had a working pressure of 650 psi, much better than the macro, but I cannot find that micro line any more. Steel is always the safest. My. $.02

            P.S. 32 degrees products do suck. Really bad!!
            Feedback

            For Sale Link

            Retro MAG for sale


            Back in the Bronx again baby!

            Comment

            • ShaftyMcGee
              SHAZBOT
              • Feb 2003
              • 380

              #21
              ive had bad experience with macro, i blew my line bout... 5 times this year almost all of which managed to hit me in the hand.. and blew one 90 degree elbow in half hitting me in the knuckle, that one stung.. changed to SS lines and havent had a problem since. i used micro line for a lil bit, only problem i had was i didnt trust it, seemed to frail, other then that it worked good.
              VIVA LA TOM

              Comment

              • JT2002
                Registered User
                • Jun 2002
                • 1863

                #22
                well shaftey, what products were you using? and on the fittings, were there any plastic parts involved on the fittings/

                Comment

                • adam shannon
                  Registered User
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 805

                  #23
                  ive never used microline, i had macro for a couple weeks on my first impulse...i switched to ss braided line with quick disconects. i tried all the tricks to stop it from scratching the marker...shrink wrap hose, rubber pressure tape, and even latex grip paint(the stuff you dip tools in to get a hard rubber coating).

                  a friend of mine swears by monster line. a thicker larger diameter higher flow type of macro line...but you need special sized fittings for it.

                  what i use now on all my tanks and markers is grease whip hose. its a nylon core wrapped hose with rubber coating thats rated to 3000psi. its a little thicker than ss braid, but it can bend better without getting kinks. plus PB shops charge about $1 an inch for ss braid...greasewhip hose ran me like $3 for 18 inches.

                  i also moved away from quick disconects as they tend to suck after time and blow o-rings and not get good seals. at least mine did. i now swear by pro connects. plus pro connects blead the line when disconnected so you can degass the marker without having to blead the line and shut the tank off. they are rather pricey...but well worth it for reliability.



                  the site i got the pro connects from is having problems, but heres the link anyways.

                  "whoever did that in the bathroom needs to start eating right and go see a doctor" - Tunaman, AOSC 2

                  "back in the day of pumps this would have taken all @!#$ing afternoon" - Albinonewt , "Treatise On Welts"; chapter 2: The Electro Revolution

                  Comment

                  Working...