OMG This Viking is FAST!!!

**bunkermaster10** · 11-30-2003, 01:57 PM

WOW!

. *Cough*thatguyisadork*Cough*

**TransMan** · 11-30-2003, 02:34 PM

I would trade being the sexy stud i am (HAHA) to look liek a dork if i had those fingers

**Ov3rmind** · 11-30-2003, 02:37 PM

Originally posted by bunkermaster10
WOW! . *Cough*thatguyisadork*Cough*

Sounds like someone is jealous.

**bunkermaster10** · 11-30-2003, 02:41 PM

Right....(*austin powers*), I do want that marker though

. Gosh stop flaming me its just an opionion :o...lol

**Prairie** · 11-30-2003, 04:45 PM

http://www.flagpull.com/AKA/lawn.wmv < yay bounce :-P

**Army** · 11-30-2003, 08:23 PM

Again...another "claim" to speed.

He won't put up the sound graph that he admitted to being really bad, because of the crappy mic he used. This was also shot in a bedroom, which will produce horrendous echo for the crappy mic to hear. Then he admits to the sound graph being "one big boom"...yet he somehow counts out "actual" speeds anyway.....

Sorry, come back again when you can prove what you say. I am rarely impressed...this is not one of those times.

Cool plexiglass trigger though.

**TransMan** · 11-30-2003, 09:32 PM

HATER!!!!

j/k

I see your point and i really hope he prooves his self right but if it aint 40 i would guess its still above 30.

**Armed & Harmless** · 11-30-2003, 11:35 PM

im not a hater. LoL but i gotta call BS. heres a sound clip of me raking 20 on my DYE trix LCD. its not quiet as fast as that viking. but very close. i seriously dont think hes getting anywhere near 40.

TeamBlizzard.com is for sale | HugeDomains

https://www.teamblizzard.com/matrix1.wav

This domain is for sale! Fast and easy shopping. Trusted and secure since 2005.

just right click, click save target as.

**rx2** · 11-30-2003, 11:52 PM

I really don't care that much about which marker is the fastest, as I don't have anything invested in the outcome. However, as someone who works with audio every day, I can't help but complain about the terrible jobs some people do with recording. Really, to try and extrapolate data from that is stretching it quite a bit. Even "removing distortion" in his Cool Edit Pro is not worth a thing. I have literally thousands of dollars in software at my disposal, and I wouldn't trust the outcome I could get out of that clip anymore than I would of someone just trying to guess.

Furthermore, I have a gripe about all of these people calculating cps by merely taking what they perceive to be the shortest rest between two consecutive cycles, and then dividing one second by that figure. Again, I have the same software that they use in major studios, post-production mastering houses, etc, and I can tell you that it is still difficult to get a true figure by this means, unless you have a pristine waveform. When you are trying to measure peak to peak, you may think you are on the head, but when you really analyze it at sample resolution, you will find you are usually off by quite a bit. This isn't drastic, but it can add, or subtract, several cycles or more from your figure. I am sure that some of those who have done this method have caught on, and use this to their advantage by posting screen shots of what almost everyone thinks is accurate, but a few people, such as myself, know better.

That is quite fast, still. I have always liked those markers, and this is more reason to check one out. That is, after I buy more audio gear...

**LeatherPants** · 11-30-2003, 11:59 PM

That wasn't bad. Though I love seeing paint shot fast more than vids of guys in their bedroom.

I just like seeing paint being shot consistently at 18+ because that's fun and expensive.

**Armed & Harmless** · 11-30-2003, 11:59 PM

im going by what my LCD tells me.

again, backing up my previous statment, my LCD said 20. so i was probably shooting 18ish with a burst or 2 of 20. although his sounds (and is) faster than mine. is it really twice as fast?... not a chance. still extremly fast i might add. but not what he claims it to be.

**Jack & Coke** · 12-01-2003, 02:45 AM

Originally posted by Army
Again...another "claim" to speed.

He won't put up the sound graph that he admitted to being really bad, because of the crappy mic he used. This was also shot in a bedroom, which will produce horrendous echo for the crappy mic to hear. Then he admits to the sound graph being "one big boom"...yet he somehow counts out "actual" speeds anyway.....

Sorry, come back again when you can prove what you say. I am rarely impressed...this is not one of those times.

Cool plexiglass trigger though.

Originally posted by rx2
I really don't care that much about which marker is the fastest, as I don't have anything invested in the outcome. However, as someone who works with audio every day, I can't help but complain about the terrible jobs some people do with recording. Really, to try and extrapolate data from that is stretching it quite a bit. Even "removing distortion" in his Cool Edit Pro is not worth a thing. I have literally thousands of dollars in software at my disposal, and I wouldn't trust the outcome I could get out of that clip anymore than I would of someone just trying to guess.

Furthermore, I have a gripe about all of these people calculating cps by merely taking what they perceive to be the shortest rest between two consecutive cycles, and then dividing one second by that figure. Again, I have the same software that they use in major studios, post-production mastering houses, etc, and I can tell you that it is still difficult to get a true figure by this means, unless you have a pristine waveform. When you are trying to measure peak to peak, you may think you are on the head, but when you really analyze it at sample resolution, you will find you are usually off by quite a bit. This isn't drastic, but it can add, or subtract, several cycles or more from your figure. I am sure that some of those who have done this method have caught on, and use this to their advantage by posting screen shots of what almost everyone thinks is accurate, but a few people, such as myself, know better.

That is quite fast, still. I have always liked those markers, and this is more reason to check one out. That is, after I buy more audio gear...

Army and rx2 are correct!

Yes, the video of this viking is fast.

Just how fast?

No one can tell from this poor quality clip...

**Prairie** · 12-01-2003, 08:21 AM

Originally posted by Army
Again...another "claim" to speed.

He won't put up the sound graph that he admitted to being really bad, because of the crappy mic he used. This was also shot in a bedroom, which will produce horrendous echo for the crappy mic to hear. Then he admits to the sound graph being "one big boom"...yet he somehow counts out "actual" speeds anyway.....

Sorry, come back again when you can prove what you say. I am rarely impressed...this is not one of those times.

Cool plexiglass trigger though.

Just so you know, I make no claim at 40cps,

FlagPull.com is for sale | HugeDomains

http://www.flagpull.com/AKA/lawn.wmv

Extensive selection of high-quality domain names. Knowledgeable, friendly customer support.

That is 28cps, low of 25cps, high of 30cps.

**CodeMA** · 12-01-2003, 02:28 PM

thats crazy reguardless, however I can still sweetspot my retromag with 850 output preset tank almost as fast as lawn bounce vid there...sounds very similar anyway...the last few bps sound wize is barely noticeable...and wont be in strings of paint eather

**Prairie** · 12-01-2003, 04:06 PM

Originally posted by CodeMA
thats crazy reguardless, however I can still sweetspot my retromag with 850 output preset tank almost as fast as lawn bounce vid there...sounds very similar anyway...the last few bps sound wize is barely noticeable...and wont be in strings of paint eather

Your mag isn't that efficient...the tank started out at 700 psi :-P

OMG This Viking is FAST!!!

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment