Newer Software??? 4.0???

[RoadDawg]

I've hit 20 once on mine and average 15 or so otherwise. Now that is holding it at a weird angle not "in game" style. I have a extremely light and pretty close trigger. I kinda feel it's like the timmy bps meter. Not always reliable but a good confidence booster.

[Z-man]

I was able to reach 24 bps once raking the trigger but most times I am set at 16-18 and 20 now and then (I must learn this walking thing better).

Mscue this thread is turning into the beta testing feedback page. If that is fine then I will start posting what I find as well but is there a different thread to post on? should we PM you? thanks

[JEDI]

Originally posted by Miscue


He wasn't hitting 26, more like 20. No marker was exceeding that to my knowledge... we'll be looking into that, as all of this is new to us.

I saw 26 this past sunday on 4.0. At least thats what the little counter said.

[RoadDawg]

Originally posted by JEDI


I saw 26 this past sunday on 4.0. At least thats what the little counter said.

Flyboy hit 27 before we left SLO on sunday. Then his battery died shortly after.

[Miscue]

Well, when your battery is almost dead... where it won't even shoot... the chip runs slower and it acts funky. There is no RTC, and the timing is based off of clock cycles... and you end up with longer seconds... more time to get in more shots. Doesn't do that when battery power isn't really low.

[Miscue]

Originally posted by Z-man
I was able to reach 24 bps once raking the trigger but most times I am set at 16-18 and 20 now and then (I must learn this walking thing better).

Mscue this thread is turning into the beta testing feedback page. If that is fine then I will start posting what I find as well but is there a different thread to post on? should we PM you? thanks

Everything that everyone has mentioned, we're aware of... although information is appreciated... particularly odd behavior. I 'think' I have what info I need from this initial version. I'm polishing it up right now, and will be focusing on these revisions as far as field testing goes.

[Duke of Lawnchair]

We had a marker that had the plunger length adjusted wrong, and it couldn't hang at all.

Miscue,

I believe that was my marker, it was the second marker you reprogrammed during the meet.

How do I go about remedying the plunger length?

Jim

[Miscue]

Originally posted by Duke of Lawnchair


Miscue,

I believe that was my marker, it was the second marker you reprogrammed during the meet.

How do I go about remedying the plunger length?

Jim

If that's the same gun, Tom got the calipers out and fixed it.

[Duke of Lawnchair]

Hmmmm, not my gun then...

[Miscue]

Ok well... make sure your plunger rod is at: 3.005"

[gibby]

Like Miscue stated, whenever I have the ROF setting above 20, I do see some unrealistic bps numbers. After setting it down to 20 bps, it seems to be a lot more accurate. I'm not that fast and can average around 15-17 bps. But that's only dry firing.

At the event, Tom and Miscue took a look at my set up and noticed that my trigger pull was way too long on my Emag. Of course, this is due because I haven't really had the time to tweak my trigger adjustments. So getting a good reading wouldn't have been possible unless it was tuned well. I've played around with my trigger this morning until I've gotten the pull to be shorter and not go in runaway mode. Once I find the time to go out and do some live tests, I'll be sure to post more.

But overall, just dry firing, I am able to sustain a good cycle rate without the hicups. Definitely much better than before. Only hicups that occurs is when my fingers gets too tired.

[SPY 1]

[Duke of Lawnchair]

Originally posted by Miscue
Ok well... make sure your plunger rod is at: 3.005"

Roger that.

[gibby]

Hrm...thinking about it. Someone with 4.0 should make a sound clip and post up the LED reading. Post it up so someone can analyze it. I would try to do it but I'm currently at work.

[RoadDawg]

I'd try but I'm getting ready to leave for work.