Originally posted by cockermongol
or chrono with the sleeve out, and then pull it back in for higher bps on the field
or chrono with the sleeve out, and then pull it back in for higher bps on the field
You have that backwards...

Since the ball does not touch the sleeve, it will act just like any of today's common step bore barrel sets.
Of course most of this would be negated if the barrel were ported.
Do this:
use a stepped barrel set (e.g. freak, CP kit, PIPE, JT, etc.)
Use tape to cover any porting holes.
Chrono your gun with:
A. Just the back peice of the barrel (~6" barrel)
B. add a 2" tip (~8" total length)
C. add a 4" tip (~10" total length)
D. add a 6" tip (~12" total length)
E. add a 8" tip (~14" total length)
F. add a 10" tip (~16" total length)
Since the control bore (back) is the only part of the barrel which comes in to physical contact with the ball, there will be NO resistance due to physical friction. Thus the common arguement "longer barrel slow down the ball due to friction..." does not apply here. The friction will be the same for all configurations.
I have done an inpromtu field test before and the highest velocities where with the 12-14" tips.
My guess is that the optimal length for a step barrel system (6" control bore) is about 13".
So back to our topic of using an 8" barrel with a sleeve.
If the sleeve is not ported then the velocities would increase if you extended it AND if not too much air excaped around the ball.
CONCLUSION...
Since the sleeve DOES have massive porting (see pic), I doubt any change in velocity would occur.




Comment